Number of the records: 1  

Inter-laboratory variability of A549 epithelial cells grown under submerged and air-liquid interface conditions

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0552840
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleInter-laboratory variability of A549 epithelial cells grown under submerged and air-liquid interface conditions
    Author(s) Bartošová, Hana (UEM-P)
    Meldrum, K. (GB)
    Karakocak, B.B. (CH)
    Balog, S. (CH)
    Doak, S.H. (GB)
    Petri-Fink, A. (CH)
    Clift, M.J.D. (US)
    Rothen-Rutishauser, B. (CH)
    Article number105178
    Source TitleToxicology in Vitro. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0887-2333
    Roč. 75, sep. (2021)
    Number of pages10 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryGB - United Kingdom
    Keywordsstandard operating procedure ; in vitro model ; alveolar epithelial cells ; lung model ; inter-laboratory assessment
    OECD categoryToxicology
    Method of publishingOpen access
    Institutional supportUEM-P - RVO:68378041
    UT WOS000672807200021
    EID SCOPUS85105355880
    DOI10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105178
    AnnotationIn vitro cell models offer a unique opportunity for conducting toxicology research, and the human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 is commonly used for toxicology testing strategies. It is essential to determine whether the response of these cells grown in different laboratories is consistent. In this study, A549 cells were grown under both submerged and air-liquid interface (ALI) conditions following an identical cell seeding protocol in two independent laboratories. The cells were switched to the ALI after four days of submerged growth, and their behaviour was compared to submerged conditions. The membrane integrity, cell viability, morphology, and (pro)inflammatory response upon positive control stimuli were assessed at days 3, 5, and 7 under submerged conditions and at days 5, 7, and 10 at the ALI. Due to the high variability of the results between the two laboratories, the experiment was subsequently repeated using identical reagents at one specific time point and condition (day 5 at the ALI). Despite some variability, the results were more comparable, proving that the original protocol necessitated improvements. In conclusion, the use of detailed protocols and consumables from the same providers, special training of personnel for cell handling, and endpoint analysis are critical to obtain reproducible results across independent laboratories.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Experimental Medicine
    ContactLenka Koželská, lenka.kozelska@iem.cas.cz, Tel.: 241 062 218, 296 442 218
    Year of Publishing2022
    Electronic addresshttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088723332100103X?via%3Dihub
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.