Number of the records: 1
Doxorubicin determination using two novel voltammetric approaches: A comparative study
- 1.0511367 - ÚFCH JH 2021 RIV GB eng J - Journal Article
Skalová, Štěpánka - Langmaier, Jan - Barek, J. - Vyskočil, V. - Navrátil, Tomáš
Doxorubicin determination using two novel voltammetric approaches: A comparative study.
Electrochimica acta. Roč. 330, JAN 2020 (2020), č. článku 135180. ISSN 0013-4686. E-ISSN 1873-3859
R&D Projects: GA ČR(CZ) GA17-05387S; GA ČR GA17-03868S
Institutional support: RVO:61388955
Keywords : dexorubicin * body fluids * amalgam
OECD category: Electrochemistry (dry cells, batteries, fuel cells, corrosion metals, electrolysis)
Impact factor: 6.901, year: 2020
Method of publishing: Limited access
Doxorubicin (DOX) represents an anthracycline-based antitumor and antibiotic medication. DOX determination in body fluids is relevant for treatment, monitoring, and individual dosage optimization. Two novel methods of DOX determination have been compared in this manuscript: i) differential pulse cathodic stripping voltammetry (DPCSV) on a polished silver solid amalgam electrode (p-AgSAE) in a specially designed micro-volume voltammetric cell (MVVC) and ii) differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) on a polarized liquid/liquid interface represented by a supported membrane prepared by impregnating a polyvinylidenfluoride microporous filter with a room-temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (TDMA-TFPB). Moreover, elimination voltammetry with linear scan (EVLS) has been applied for elucidation of controlling reaction processes observed at the p-AgSAE.
DPCSV method on the p-AgSAE is applicable for the determination of DOX in the linear dynamic range (LDR) from 0.6 to 10 μmol L−1, with the limit of detection (LOD) of 0.44 μmol L−1. Applicability of this method was verified on analysis of spiked samples of tap water (recovery 100.6 ± 6.6%, relative standard deviation (RSD) 5.9%, on the DOX level of 1.0 μmol L−1) and human urine (recovery 100.7 ± 6.6%, RSD 4.3%, on the DOX level of 1.0 μmol L−1).
Using the above-mentioned innovative liquid/liquid interface method, similar results have been achieved (LOD of 0.84 μmol L−1, LDR from 1 to 40 μmol L−1). Nevertheless, due to the presence of some interfering compounds and of charged lipophilic compounds, this method must be preceded by a separation step in the case of body fluids analysis.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0301650
File Download Size Commentary Version Access 0511367.pdf 1 1.5 MB Publisher’s postprint require
Number of the records: 1