Number of the records: 1
Logically Incorrect Arguments
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0460750 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title Logically Incorrect Arguments Author(s) Svoboda, Vladimír (FLU-F) RID, ORCID, SAI
Peregrin, Jaroslav (FLU-F) RID, ORCID, SAISource Title Argumentation: an international journal on reasoning. - : Springer Netherlands - ISSN 0920-427X
Roč. 30, č. 3 (2016), s. 263-287Number of pages 25 s. Publication form Print - P Language eng - English Country NL - Netherlands Keywords argumentation ; logical form ; incorrect argument ; correct arguments Subject RIV AA - Philosophy ; Religion R&D Projects GA13-21076S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF) Institutional support FLU-F - RVO:67985955 UT WOS 000379745200003 EID SCOPUS 84944627358 DOI 10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1 Annotation What do we learn when we find out that an argument is logically incorrect? If logically incorrect means the same as not logically correct, which in turn means not having a valid logical form, it seems that we do not learn anything too useful—an argument which is logically incorrect can still be conclusive. Thus, it seems that it makes sense to fix a stronger interpretation of the term under which a logically incorrect argument is guaranteed to be wrong (and is such for purely logical reasons). In this paper, we show that pinpointing this stronger sense is much trickier than one would expect; but eventually we reach an explication of the notion of (strong) logical incorrectness which we find non-trivial and viable. Workplace Institute of Philosophy Contact Chlumská Simona, chlumska@flu.cas.cz ; Tichá Zuzana, asep@flu.cas.cz Tel: 221 183 360 Year of Publishing 2017
Number of the records: 1