0387215 - ÚŽFG 2013 RIV CN eng J - Journal Article
Martínek, J. - Ryska, O. - Filípková, T. - Doležel, R. - Juhás, Štefan - Motlík, Jan - Holubová, Monika - Nosek, V. - Rotnáglová, B. - Zavoral, M. - Ryska, M.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: Complications and inflammatory response.
World Journal of Gastroenterology. Roč. 18, č. 27 (2012), s. 3558-3564. ISSN 1007-9327. E-ISSN 2219-2840
Institutional research plan: CEZ:AV0Z50450515
Keywords : Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery * Laparoscopy * Ovariectomy
Subject RIV: FP - Other Medical Disciplines
Impact factor: 2.547, year: 2012 ; AIS: 0.713, rok: 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558

AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovariectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental, survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten female mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected using standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic devices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0219202