Number of the records: 1  

Case study: constraint handling in evolutionary optimization of catalytic materials

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0362974
    Document TypeC - Proceedings Paper (int. conf.)
    R&D Document TypeConference Paper
    TitleCase study: constraint handling in evolutionary optimization of catalytic materials
    Author(s) Holeňa, Martin (UIVT-O) SAI, RID
    Linke, D. (DE)
    Bajer, Lukáš (UIVT-O) SAI, RID, ORCID
    Source TitleGECCO '11 Proceedings of the 13th annual conference companion on Genetic and evolutionary computation. - New York : ACM, 2011 / Krasnogor N. - ISBN 978-1-4503-0690-4
    Pagess. 333-339
    Number of pages7 s.
    ActionGECCO 2011. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference /13./
    Event date12.07.2011-16.07.2011
    VEvent locationDublin
    CountryIE - Ireland
    Event typeWRD
    Languageeng - English
    CountryUS - United States
    Keywordsevolutionary optimization ; mixed optimization ; equality constraints ; inequality constraints ; cardinality constraints
    Subject RIVIN - Informatics, Computer Science
    R&D ProjectsGA201/08/0802 GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    GAP202/11/1368 GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    CEZAV0Z10300504 - UIVT-O (2005-2011)
    EID SCOPUS80051952288
    DOI10.1145/2001858.2002015
    AnnotationThe paper presents a case study in an industrially important application domain the optimization of catalytic materials. Though evolutionary algorithms are the by far most frequent approach to optimization tasks in that domain, they are challenged by mixing continuous and discrete variables, and especially by a large number of constraints. The paper describes the various kinds of encountered constraints, and explains constraint handling in GENACAT, one of evolutionary optimization systems developed specifically for catalyst optimization. In particular, it is shown that the interplay between cardinality constraints and linear equality and inequality constraints allows GENACAT to efficienlty determine the set of feasible solutions, and to split the original optimization task into a sequence of discrete and continuous optimization. Finally, the genetic operations employed in the discrete optimization are sketched, among which crossover is based on an assumption about the importance of the choice of sets of continuous variables in the cardinality constraints.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Computer Science
    ContactTereza Šírová, sirova@cs.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 053 800
    Year of Publishing2012
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.