Number of the records: 1
Retroaktivita jako diskursivní pojem?
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0473953 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Ostatní články Title Retroaktivita jako diskursivní pojem? Title Retroactivity as an Essentially Contested Concept? Author(s) Šejvl, Michal (USP-I) ORCID Source Title Právník. - : Ústav státu a práva AV ČR, v. v. i. - ISSN 0231-6625
Roč. 156, č. 1 (2017), s. 37-62Number of pages 26 s. Publication form Print - P Language cze - Czech Country CZ - Czech Republic Keywords retroactivity ; retrospectivity ; legal fiction ; legal principle Subject RIV AG - Legal Sciences OECD category Law R&D Projects GAP408/12/2579 GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF) Institutional support USP-I - RVO:68378122 Annotation Článek se zabývá tím, zda je retroaktivita klasifikačním pojmem nebo diskursivním. Při analýze pojmu retroaktivity tematizuje rozlišování negu mezi pravou a nepravou retroaktivitou, ale především mezi těmito pojmy a retrospektivou. Závěrem argumentuje, že retroaktivita není diskurzivním pojmem. Description in English The presented article in the beginning analyses various definitions of retroactivity and classification of various situations connected with the intertemporal effect of legal norms in the works of various Czech legal scholars. On the basis of this analysis it tries to identify and solve various problems (e.g. by distinguishing between material and formal applicability of legal norm). Then it presents its own classification of various situations connected with the intertemporal effect of legal norm and stress the importance of distinguishing between “real” retroactivity (Echte Rückwirkung), “apparent” retroactivity (Unechte Rückwirkung) and retrospectivity. It tries to argue that “real” retroactivity is not used in practice and that retrospectivity is used instead. Then it discusses the possibility to understand the concept of retroactivity as a legal principle and concludes that if we accept this understanding, then the concept of retroactivity becomes irrelevant. It also analyzes the concept of retroactivity as an essentially contested concept, and establishes the distinction between legal principles and essentially contested concepts and concludes that we shall still maintain such understanding of retroactivity which treats it as a criterial concept and only afterwards we shall decide whether some intertemporal effect of legal norm is unacceptable in the light of legal principles.
Workplace Institute of State and Law Contact Iveta Bůžková, iveta.buzkova@ilaw.cas.cz, Tel.: 221 990 714 Year of Publishing 2018
Number of the records: 1