Number of the records: 1  

Theoretical models of decision-making in the Ultimatum Game: Fairness vs. Reason

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0453669
    Document TypeC - Proceedings Paper (int. conf.)
    R&D Document TypeConference Paper
    TitleTheoretical models of decision-making in the Ultimatum Game: Fairness vs. Reason
    Author(s) Guy, Tatiana Valentine (UTIA-B) RID, ORCID
    Kárný, Miroslav (UTIA-B) RID, ORCID
    Villa, A. P. (CH)
    Lintas, A. (CH)
    Source TitleAdvances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (V), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics - 2015. - Singapur : Springer-Verlag, 2016 / Wang Rubin ; Pan Xiaochuan - ISSN 2213-3569 - ISBN 978-981-10-0205-2
    Pagess. 185-191
    Number of pages6 s.
    Publication formPrint - P
    ActionICCN 2015
    Event date03.06.2015-07.06.2015
    VEvent locationSanya
    CountryCN - China
    Event typeWRD
    Languageeng - English
    CountrySG - Singapore
    Keywordsfairness ; rationality ; Ultimatum game ; decision making
    Subject RIVBB - Applied Statistics, Operational Research
    R&D ProjectsGA13-13502S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Institutional supportUTIA-B - RVO:67985556
    UT WOS000387956200026
    DOI10.1007/978-981-10-0207-6_26
    AnnotationAccording to Game Theory a human subject playing the Ultimatum Game should choose more for oneself and offer the least amount possible for co-players (assumption of selfish rationality) [1]. However, economy, sociology and neurology communities repeatedly claim nonrationality of the human behaviour [2], following the observation that responders reject offers they find too low and proposers often offer more than the smallest amount, thus suggesting that humans’ behaviour is significantly influenced by social norms. We also assume human rationality, but our model describes a human-responder via decision process with a reward function respecting fairness as much as the economic profit. This model is positively tested against a set of original experimental data, thus providing an insight into human’s motivation as a social being.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Information Theory and Automation
    ContactMarkéta Votavová, votavova@utia.cas.cz, Tel.: 266 052 201.
    Year of Publishing2016
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.