Number of the records: 1
Effect of tree harvest, silvopastoral practices, and microclimate conditions on forest floor CO2 efflux in a sessile oak (Quercus petraea agg. [Matt.] Liebl.) forest
- 1.
SYSNO ASEP 0546324 Document Type J - Journal Article R&D Document Type Journal Article Subsidiary J Článek ve WOS Title Effect of tree harvest, silvopastoral practices, and microclimate conditions on forest floor CO2 efflux in a sessile oak (Quercus petraea agg. [Matt.] Liebl.) forest Author(s) Dařenová, Eva (UEK-B) RID, ORCID, SAI
Kadavý, J. (CZ)
Knott, R. (CZ)
Kokrda, Lukas (UEK-B) SAI, ORCID, RID
Novotný, Jan (UEK-B) RID, SAI, ORCIDNumber of authors 5 Article number 80 Source Title Annals of Forest Science. - : Springer - ISSN 1286-4560
Roč. 78, č. 3 (2021)Number of pages 12 s. Language eng - English Country FR - France Keywords soil respiration ; temperature sensitivity ; heterotrophic respiration ; pine plantation ; carbon-dioxide ; moisture ; decomposition ; coppice ; manipulation ; ecosystems ; Harvest ; Litter raking ; Pasture ; Quercus petraea ; Soil respiration ; Soil water content Subject RIV GK - Forestry OECD category Forestry R&D Projects LM2018123 GA MŠMT - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) EF16_019/0000797 GA MŠMT - Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) Research Infrastructure CzeCOS III - 90123 - Ústav výzkumu globální změny AV ČR, v. v. i. Method of publishing Open access Institutional support UEK-B - RVO:86652079 UT WOS 000698367600003 EID SCOPUS 85114829244 DOI 10.1007/s13595-021-01101-z Annotation Key message Forest floor CO2 efflux (R-f, consisted of soil and potential vegetation) increased after forest harvest, but this response was changed by actual weather (especially drought and rains). Context Soil respiration is a large source of CO2 released to the atmosphere and is sensitive to forest management practices and weather. Aims To determine effects of harvest, ancient practices and weather in a newly established coppice forest on R-f. Methods R-f, temperature, and moisture were measured during 1 year before and 2 years after harvest. Results Pasturing and raking had no effect on R-f. It tended to increase during the first season after harvest. In the second year after harvest, differences in R-f between control and harvested plots became much greater because of intensively developing herbaceous vegetation on harvested plots. No difference between the control and harvested plots was found during severely dry conditions. Following intensive rain pulses, R-f was larger in the control than in the harvested plots. Conclusion Findings indicate that the R-f response is not uniform in time and depends on microclimate, particularly on soil moisture. This may be crucial for estimation of the harvest impact on soil processes especially under changing climate. Workplace Global Change Research Institute Contact Nikola Šviková, svikova.n@czechglobe.cz, Tel.: 511 192 268 Year of Publishing 2022 Electronic address https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13595-021-01101-z
Number of the records: 1