Number of the records: 1  

Cloud Shade by Dynamic Logistic Modeling

  1. 1.
    0420888 - ÚI 2015 RIV GB eng J - Journal Article
    Brabec, Marek - Badescu, V. - Paulescu, M.
    Cloud Shade by Dynamic Logistic Modeling.
    Journal of Applied Statistics. Roč. 41, č. 6 (2014), s. 1174-1188. ISSN 0266-4763. E-ISSN 1360-0532
    R&D Projects: GA MŠMT LD12009
    Grant - others:European Cooperation in Science and Technology(XE) COST ES1002
    Institutional support: RVO:67985807
    Keywords : clouds * random process * sunshine number * Markovian logistic regression model
    Subject RIV: BB - Applied Statistics, Operational Research
    Impact factor: 0.417, year: 2014

    During the daytime, the sun is shining or not at ground level depending on clouds motion. Two binary variables may be used to quantify this process: the sunshine number (SSN) and the sunshine stability number (SSSN). The sequential features of SSN are treated in this paper by using Markovian Logistic Regression models, which avoid usual weaknesses of autoregressive integrated moving average modeling. The theory is illustrated with results obtained by using measurements performed in 2010 at Timisoara (southern Europe). Simple modeling taking into account internal dynamics with one lag history brings substantial reduction of misclassification compared with the persistence approach (to less than 57%). When longer history is considered, all the lags up to at least 8 are important. The seasonal changes are rather concentrated to low lags. Better performance is associated with a more stable radiative regime. More involved models add external influences (such as sun elevation angle or astronomic declination as well as taking into account morning and afternoon effects separately). Models including sun elevation effects are significantly better than those ignoring them. Clearly, during the winter months, the effect of declination is much more pronounced compared with the rest of the year. SSSN is important in long-term considerations and it also plays a role in retrospective assessment of the SSN. However, it is not easy to use SSSN for predicting future SSN. Using more complicated past beam clearness models does not necessarily provide better results than more simple models with SSN past.
    Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0227348

     
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.