Number of the records: 1  

More Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries\n

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0523658
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JOstatní články
    TitleMore Efficient Collective Redress Mechanisms? Will the New Deal Directive on Representative Actions for Protecting the Collective Interests of Consumers Improve the Resolution of Mass Harm Situations in the Visegrad 4 Countries
    Author(s) Simon, Rita (USP-I) ORCID
    Source TitleEuropean Review of Private Law. - : Kluwer Law International - ISSN 0928-9801
    Roč. 27, č. 6 (2020), s. 1389-1410
    Number of pages22 s.
    Publication formOnline - E
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNL - Netherlands
    KeywordsNew Deal for Consumers ; representative actions ; collective redress mechanisms ; Visegrad 4 countries ; more flexible enhanced administrative measures
    Subject RIVAG - Legal Sciences
    OECD categoryLaw
    Method of publishingMetadata only
    Institutional supportUSP-I - RVO:68378122
    AnnotationClassic injunction actions before a court are very rarely used instruments in the Visegrad 4 countries, they are too expensive, too long proceedings, with uncertain results. On one hand, a lost court case can cause insolvency for the organization and on other hand a won case cannot ensure a direct compensation of the harmed consumer. Therefore, the Visegrad 4 consumer protection organizations tend to move to other redresses. After a short introduction to existing injunction actions and their shortcuts in the Visegrad 4 counties (1), the article explains why the way of amending representative actions, as recommended by the new Commission Proposal cannot provide more efficient or effective justice in the Visegrad 4 countries (2), and based on the best practices of the Visegrad 4 countries I will propose alternative instruments, such as public enforcement and more flexible enhanced consumer measures by administrative authorities, which have proved quite efficient in resolving mass harm situations (3).
    WorkplaceInstitute of State and Law
    ContactIveta Bůžková, iveta.buzkova@ilaw.cas.cz, Tel.: 221 990 714
    Year of Publishing2020
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.