Number of the records: 1  

QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0539814
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleQSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping
    Author(s) Škuta, Ctibor (UMG-J)
    Cortes-Ciriano, I. (GB)
    Dehaen, W. (CZ)
    Kříž, P. (CZ)
    van Westen, G.J.P. (NL)
    Tetko, I. V. (DE)
    Bender, A. (GB)
    Svozil, Daniel (UMG-J)
    Number of authors8
    Article number39
    Source TitleJournal of Cheminformatics. - : BioMed Central - ISSN 1758-2946
    Roč. 12, č. 1 (2020)
    Number of pages16 s.
    Publication formOnline - E
    Languageeng - English
    CountryGB - United Kingdom
    KeywordsAffinity fingerprint ; Biological fingerprint ; qsar ; Similarity searching ; Bioactivity modeling ; Scaffold hopping
    Subject RIVEB - Genetics ; Molecular Biology
    OECD categoryComputer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
    Method of publishingOpen access
    Institutional supportUMG-J - RVO:68378050
    UT WOS000548756200001
    DOI10.1186/s13321-020-00443-6
    AnnotationAn affinity fingerprint is the vector consisting of compound's affinity or potency against the reference panel of protein targets. Here, we present the QAFFP fingerprint, 440 elements long in silico QSAR-based affinity fingerprint, components of which are predicted by Random Forest regression models trained on bioactivity data from the ChEMBL database. Both real-valued (rv-QAFFP) and binary (b-QAFFP) versions of the QAFFP fingerprint were implemented and their performance in similarity searching, biological activity classification and scaffold hopping was assessed and compared to that of the 1024 bits long Morgan2 fingerprint (the RDKit implementation of the ECFP4 fingerprint). In both similarity searching and biological activity classification, the QAFFP fingerprint yields retrieval rates, measured by AUC (similar to 0.65 and similar to 0.70 for similarity searching depending on data sets, and similar to 0.85 for classification) and EF5 (similar to 4.67 and similar to 5.82 for similarity searching depending on data sets, and similar to 2.10 for classification), comparable to that of the Morgan2 fingerprint (similarity searching AUC of similar to 0.57 and similar to 0.66, and EF5 of similar to 4.09 and similar to 6.41, depending on data sets, classification AUC of similar to 0.87, and EF5 of similar to 2.16). However, the QAFFP fingerprint outperforms the Morgan2 fingerprint in scaffold hopping as it is able to retrieve 1146 out of existing 1749 scaffolds, while the Morgan2 fingerprint reveals only 864 scaffolds.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Molecular Genetics
    ContactNikol Škňouřilová, nikol.sknourilova@img.cas.cz, Tel.: 241 063 217
    Year of Publishing2021
    Electronic addresshttps://jcheminf.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13321-020-00443-6
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.