Number of the records: 1  

Using survey questions to measure preferences: lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0532770
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleUsing survey questions to measure preferences: lessons from an experimental validation in Kenya
    Author(s) Bauer, Michal (NHU-N) RID
    Chytilová, Julie (NHU-N)
    Miguel, E. (US)
    Article number103493
    Source TitleEuropean Economic Review. - : Elsevier - ISSN 0014-2921
    Roč. 127, August (2020)
    Number of pages8 s.
    Publication formPrint - P
    Languageeng - English
    CountryNL - Netherlands
    Keywordspreference measurement ; experiment ; survey
    Subject RIVAH - Economics
    OECD categoryApplied Economics, Econometrics
    R&D ProjectsGA17-13869S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    GA20-11091S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Method of publishingLimited access
    Institutional supportNHU-N - RVO:67985998
    UT WOS000552030900027
    EID SCOPUS85086427947
    DOI10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103493
    AnnotationCan a short survey instrument reliably measure a range of fundamental economic preferences across diverse settings? We focus on survey questions that systematically predict behavior in incentivized experimental tasks among German university students (Becker et al. 2016) and were implemented among representative samples across the globe (Falk et al. 2018). This paper presents results of an experimental validation conducted among low-income individuals in Nairobi, Kenya. We find that quantitative survey measures – hypothetical versions of experimental tasks – of time preference, attitude to risk and altruism are good predictors of choices in incentivized experiments, suggesting these measures are broadly experimentally valid. At the same time, we find that qualitative questions – self-assessments – do not correlate with the experimental measures of preferences in the Kenyan sample. Thus, caution is needed before treating self-assessments as proxies of preferences in new contexts.
    WorkplaceEconomics Institute
    ContactTomáš Pavela, pavela@cerge-ei.cz, Tel.: 224 005 122
    Year of Publishing2021
    Electronic addresshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103493
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.