0524920 - FLÚ 2021 RIV CH eng J - Journal Article
Arazim, Pavel
Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism.
Logica Universalis. Roč. 14, č. 2 (2020), s. 151-174. ISSN 1661-8297. E-ISSN 1661-8300
R&D Projects: GA ČR(CZ) GA17-15645S
Institutional support: RVO:67985955
Keywords : Logical concepts * Development * Logical pluralism * Inferentialism * Expressivism * Logical dynamism
OECD category: Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Impact factor: 0.385, year: 2020 ; AIS: 0.255, rok: 2020
Method of publishing: Limited access
Result website:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2

Logical pluralism as a thesis that more than one logic is correct seems very plausible for two basic reasons. First, there are so many logical systems on the market today. And it is unclear how we should decide which of them gets the logical rules right. On the other hand, logical monism as the opposite thesis still seems plausible, as well, because of normativity of logic. An approach which would manage to bring a synthesis of both logical pluralism and logical monism is called for. I review the possible forms of logical pluralism and render them more plausible. I thus arrive at logical dynamism, a synthesis of various pluralisms and monism focused on how logic develops.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0309151