Number of the records: 1  

Quantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0583029
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleQuantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis
    Author(s) Zákopčaník, Marek (MBU-M) ORCID
    Kavan, Daniel (MBU-M) RID, ORCID
    Novák, Petr (MBU-M) RID, ORCID
    Loginov, Dmitry Sergej (MBU-M) RID
    Source TitleJournal of Proteome Research. - : American Chemical Society - ISSN 1535-3893
    Roč. 23, č. 2 (2023), s. 609-617
    Number of pages9 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryUS - United States
    Keywordsmass-spectrometry ; exchange ; fpop ; searchengine ; structural proteomics
    OECD categoryMicrobiology
    Method of publishingOpen access
    Institutional supportMBU-M - RVO:61388971
    UT WOS001157569300001
    EID SCOPUS85181560169
    DOI10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390
    AnnotationFast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) is a promising technique for studying protein structure and dynamics. The quality of insight provided by FPOP depends on the reliability of the determination of the modification site. This study investigates the performance of two search engines, Mascot and PEAKS, for the data processing of FPOP analyses. Comparison of Mascot and PEAKS of the hemoglobin--haptoglobin Bruker timsTOF data set (PXD021621) revealed greater consistency in the Mascot identification of modified peptides, with around 26% of the IDs being mutual for all three replicates, compared to approximately 22% for PEAKS. The intersection between Mascot and PEAKS results revealed a limited number (31%) of shared modified peptides. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) score, site probability, and peptide intensity was applied to evaluate the results, and the analyses revealed distinct clusters of modified peptides. Mascot showed the ability to assess confident site determination, even with lower PSM scores. However, high PSM scores from PEAKS did not guarantee a reliable determination of the modification site. Fragmentation coverage of the modification position played a crucial role in Mascot assignments, while the AScore localizations from PEAKS often become ambiguous because the software employs MS/MS merging.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Microbiology
    ContactEliška Spurná, eliska.spurna@biomed.cas.cz, Tel.: 241 062 231
    Year of Publishing2024
    Electronic addresshttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.