Number of the records: 1  

Benchmark forward gravity schemes: the gravity field of a realistic lithosphere model WINTERC-G

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0557403
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleBenchmark forward gravity schemes: the gravity field of a realistic lithosphere model WINTERC-G
    Author(s) Root, B. (DE)
    Sebera, Josef (ASU-R) RID, ORCID
    Szwillus, W. (DE)
    Thieulot, C. (NL)
    Martinec, Z. (IE)
    Fullea, J. (IE)
    Number of authors6
    Source TitleSolid Earth. - : Copernicus - ISSN 1869-9510
    Roč. 13, č. 5 (2022), s. 849-873
    Number of pages25 s.
    Publication formOnline - E
    Languageeng - English
    CountryDE - Germany
    Keywordsgravity ; benchmark ; lithosphere
    Subject RIVDE - Earth Magnetism, Geodesy, Geography
    OECD categoryPhysical geography
    Method of publishingLimited access
    Institutional supportASU-R - RVO:67985815
    UT WOS000790289900001
    EID SCOPUS85130637814
    DOI10.5194/se-13-849-2022
    AnnotationSeveral alternative gravity forward modelling methodologies and associated numerical codes with their own advantages and limitations are available for the solid Earth community. With upcoming state-of-the-art lithosphere density models and accurate global gravity field data sets, it is vital to understand the opportunities and limitations of the various approaches. In this paper, we discuss the four widely used techniques: global spherical harmonics (GSH), tesseroid integration ( LESS), triangle integration (TRI), and hexahedral integration (HEX). A constant density shell benchmark shows that all four codes can produce similar precise gravitational potential fields. Two additional shell tests were conducted with more complicated density structures: laterally varying density structures and a crust- mantle interface density. The differences between the four codes were all below 1.5 % of the modelled gravity signal suitable for reproducing satellite-acquired gravity data. TESS and GSH produced the most similar potential fields (< 0.3 %).
    WorkplaceAstronomical Institute
    ContactRadka Svašková, bibl@asu.cas.cz, Tel.: 323 620 326
    Year of Publishing2023
    Electronic addresshttps://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-849-2022
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.