Number of the records: 1  

Genetic diversity of a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0519220
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleGenetic diversity of a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania
    Author(s) Bartáková, Veronika (UBO-W) SAI, RID, ORCID
    Nagy, B. (FR)
    Polačik, Matej (UBO-W) RID, SAI, ORCID
    Blažek, Radim (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Lamtane, H. (TZ)
    Reichard, Martin (UBO-W) RID, ORCID, SAI, SAI
    Number of authors6
    Article number1
    Source TitleBMC Evolutionary Biology. - : BioMed Central - ISSN 1471-2148
    Roč. 20, č. 1 (2020)
    Number of pages13 s.
    Languageeng - English
    CountryGB - United Kingdom
    KeywordsDispersal ; Eastern Africa ; River morphology ; Temporary pool ; mtDNA ; Historical demography
    Subject RIVEG - Zoology
    OECD categoryBiology (theoretical, mathematical, thermal, cryobiology, biological rhythm), Evolutionary biology
    R&D ProjectsGA19-01781S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Method of publishingOpen access
    Institutional supportUBO-W - RVO:68081766
    UT WOS000514860900001
    EID SCOPUS85077542825
    DOI10.1186/s12862-019-1549-2
    AnnotationBackground: African annual killifishes (Nothobranchius spp.) are adapted to seasonally desiccating habitats (ephemeral pools), surviving dry periods as dormant eggs. Given their peculiar life history, geographic aspects of their diversity uniquely combine patterns typical for freshwater taxa (river basin structure and elevation gradient) and terrestrial animals (rivers acting as major dispersal barriers). However, our current knowledge on fine-scale interspecific and intra-specific genetic diversity of African annual fish is limited to a single, particularly dry region of their distribution (subtropical Mozambique). Using a widespread annual killifish from coastal Tanzania and Kenya, we tested whether the same pattern of genetic divergence pertains to a wet equatorial region in the centre of Nothobranchius distribution.
    Results: In populations of Nothobranchius melanospilus species group across its range, we genotyped a part of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene (83 individuals from 22 populations) and 10 nuclear microsatellite markers (251 individuals from 16 populations). We found five lineages with a clear phylogeographic structure but frequent secondary contact. Mitochondrial lineages were largely congruent with main population genetic clusters identified on microsatellite markers. In the upper Wami basin, populations are isolated as a putative Nothobranchius prognathus, but include also a population from a periphery of the middle Ruvu basin. Other four lineages (including putative Nothobranchius kwalensis) coexisted in secondary contact zones, but possessed clear spatial pattern. Main river channels did not form apparent barriers to dispersal. The most widespread lineage had strong signal of recent population expansion.
    Conclusions: We conclude that dispersal of a Nothobranchius species from a wet part of the genus distribution (tropical lowland) is not constrained by main river channels and closely related lineages frequently coexist in secondary contact zones. We also demonstrate contemporary connection between the Ruvu and Rufiji river basins. Our data do not provide genetic support for existence of recently described cryptic species from N. melanospilus complex, but cannot resolve this issue.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Vertebrate Biology
    ContactHana Slabáková, slabakova@ivb.cz, Tel.: 543 422 524
    Year of Publishing2021
    Electronic addresshttps://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-019-1549-2
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.