Number of the records: 1
A commentary on Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial by Young LA, Buse JB, Weaver MA, Vu MB, Mitchell CM, Blakeney T, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:920-929
- 1.0490804 - ÚI 2019 CH eng J - Journal Article
Brož, J. - Holubová, A. - Vlasáková, M. - Mužík, J. - Brabec, Marek - Rahelic, D.
A commentary on Glucose Self-monitoring in Non-Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care Settings: A Randomized Trial by Young LA, Buse JB, Weaver MA, Vu MB, Mitchell CM, Blakeney T, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:920-929.
Frontiers in Endocrinology. Roč. 9 (2018), č. článku 389. ISSN 1664-2392. E-ISSN 1664-2392
Institutional support: RVO:67985807
Keywords : glucose self-monitoring * type 2 diabetes mellitus * metabolc control * HbA1c * hypoglycemia
OECD category: Endocrinology and metabolism (including diabetes, hormones)
Impact factor: 3.634, year: 2018
The articles published by Young et al. (1,2) have presented the results and protocol of their Monitor Trial Study, comparing three approaches to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) to the subsequent outcome of their HbA1c metabolic control, by investigating 3 groups of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients treated with non-insulin antidiabetics, i.e. “no SMBG”, “once daily SMBG”, and “once daily SMBG with enhanced patient feedback” groups. The authors concluded that neither clinically nor statistically significant differences were found after year 1 of the study, thus expressing a skeptical view towards the routine use of SMBG in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. A comprehensive list of metanalysis, studies, and recommendations (3) presenting inconsistent results and advice as to the use of SMBG in treating T2DM patients were mentioned in the article The Authors also considered the fact that there was only lower grade evidence (B,C,D) (4) supporting SMBG treatment, including our paper (5) recommending specified SMBG use.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0284943
File Download Size Commentary Version Access 0490804.pdf 5 163.9 KB OA Publisher’s postprint open-access
Number of the records: 1