Number of the records: 1  

Community Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields - What’s the Difference?

  1. 1.
    SYSNO ASEP0574093
    Document TypeJ - Journal Article
    R&D Document TypeJournal Article
    Subsidiary JČlánek ve WOS
    TitleCommunity Landscape Preferences for Reuse of Soviet-Era Post-Agricultural Brownfields - What’s the Difference?
    Author(s) Navrátil, Josef (UGN-S) ORCID, SAI, RID
    Martinát, Stanislav (UGN-S) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Hewitt, R. J. (GB)
    Frazier, R. J. (US)
    Klusáček, Petr (UGN-S) RID, ORCID
    Škrabal, J. (CZ)
    Krejčí, Tomáš (UGN-S) RID, ORCID
    Osman, Robert (UGN-S) RID, ORCID, SAI
    Pícha, K. (CZ)
    Number of authors9
    Source TitleRural Sociology. - : Wiley - ISSN 0036-0112
    Roč. 88, č. 2 (2023), s. 362-391
    Number of pages30 s.
    Publication formOnline - E
    Languageeng - English
    CountryUS - United States
    Keywordsagricultural brownfields ; green space ; regeneration ; redevelopment ; perception ; sites ; city ; remediation ; energy ; park
    Subject RIVAO - Sociology, Demography
    OECD categoryEnvironmental sciences (social aspects)
    R&D ProjectsGA19-23870S GA ČR - Czech Science Foundation (CSF)
    Method of publishingLimited access
    Institutional supportUGN-S - RVO:68145535
    UT WOS000928820700001
    EID SCOPUS85147530561
    DOI10.1111/ruso.12479
    AnnotationReuse preferences for post-agricultural brownfields on former socialist agricultural premises in CEE countries are likely to be diverse and may depend on communities' experiences. Our research question is to reveal, through a questionnaire survey of 774 respondents from 180 communities, the difference in reuse preferences among communities with different experiences: communities where former collective farm sites had been abandoned (leaving a post-agricultural brownfield), those where such sites had remained in continuous agricultural use, and those where such sites had been abandoned and later remediated or reused. The responses from the three types of communities were compared using Kruskal–Wallis tests and the structure of preferences was analyzed by Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling. Communities with an existing post-agricultural brownfield prefer housing and leisure activities, while communities with sites in continuous agricultural production prefer agrarian uses. Two main poles of choice were identified-productive and non-productive uses. While productive uses are preferred by respondents from communities with continuous agricultural production, non-productive uses are preferred by communities with former post-agricultural brownfields. The presence of post-agricultural brownfields within the community is an important factor in determining a community's preferences for its reuse. When agricultural sites are abandoned, communities' preferences for its reuse also change.
    WorkplaceInstitute of Geonics
    ContactLucie Gurková, lucie.gurkova@ugn.cas.cz, Tel.: 596 979 354
    Year of Publishing2024
    Electronic addresshttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ruso.12479
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.