Misreporting of government transfers: how important are survey design and geography?

0507562 - NHU-C 2020 RIV US eng J - Journal Article
Meyer, B. D. - Mittag, Nikolas
Misreporting of government transfers: how important are survey design and geography?
Southern Economic Journal. Roč. 86, č. 1 (2019), s. 230-253. ISSN 0038-4038. E-ISSN 2325-8012
Institutional support: Progres-Q24
Keywords : survey error * administrative data * linked data
OECD category: Applied Economics, Econometrics
Impact factor: 0.922, year: 2019
Method of publishing: Open access
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/soej.12366

Recent studies linking household surveys to administrative records reveal high rates of misreporting of program receipt. We use the FoodAPS survey to examine whether the findings of these studies of general household surveys using one or two states generalize to a survey with a narrow focus and across many states. First, we study how reporting errors differ from other surveys. We find a lower rate of false negatives (failures to report true receipt) in FoodAPS, likely partly due to the shorter recall period of FoodAPS. Misreporting varies with household characteristics and between interviewers. Second, we examine geographic heterogeneity in survey error to assess whether we can extrapolate from linked data from a few states. We find systematic differences between states in unconditional error rates but no evidence of substantial differences conditional on common covariates. Thus, extrapolating error rates across states may yield more accurate receipt estimates than uncorrected survey estimates.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0298543