Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response

0559945 - ÚPT 2023 RIV US eng J - Journal Article
Ghossein, M. A. - van Stipdonk, A. M. W. - Plešinger, Filip - Kloosterman, M. - Wouters, P. C. - Salden, O. A. E. - Meine, M. - Maass, A. H. - Prinzen, F. W. - Vernooy, K.
Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Roč. 32, č. 3 (2021), s. 813-822. ISSN 1045-3873. E-ISSN 1540-8167
Institutional support: RVO:68081731
Keywords : cardiac resynchronization therapy * echocardiographic response * heart failure * QRS area * QRS area reduction * survival
OECD category: Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Impact factor: 2.942, year: 2021
Method of publishing: Open access
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.14910

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that the baseline QRS area is associated with the clinical response after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In this study, we investigated the association of QRS area reduction (∆QRS area) after CRT with the outcome. We hypothesize that a larger ∆QRS area is associated with a better survival and echocardiographic response.
Methods and Results: Electrocardiograms (ECG) obtained before and 2–12 months after CRT from 1299 patients in a multi-center CRT-registry were analyzed. The QRS area was calculated from vectorcardiograms that were synthesized from 12-lead ECGs. The primary endpoint was a combination of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation, and left ventricular (LV) assist device implantation. The secondary endpoint was the echocardiographic response, defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction ≥ of 15%. Patients with ∆QRS area above the optimal cut-off value (62 µVs) had a lower risk of reaching the primary endpoint (hazard ratio: 0.43, confidence interval [CI] 0.33–0.56, p < .001), and a higher chance of echocardiographic response (odds ratio [OR] 3.3,CI 2.4–4.6, p < .0001). In multivariable analysis, ∆QRS area was independently associated with both endpoints. In patients with baseline QRS area ≥109 µVs, survival, and echocardiographic response were better when the ∆QRS area was ≥62 µVs (p < .0001). Logistic regression showed that in patients with baseline QRS area ≥109 µVs, ∆QRS area was the only significant predictor of survival (OR: 0.981, CI: 0.967–0.994, p = .006).
Conclusion: ∆QRS area is an independent determinant of CRT response, especially in patients with a large baseline QRS area. Failure to achieve a large QRS area reduction with CRT is associated with a poor clinical outcome.
Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0333070