Number of the records: 1  

Different harvest intensity and soil CO2 efflux in sessile oak coppice forests

  1. 1.
    0461928 - ÚVGZ 2017 RIV IT eng J - Journal Article
    Dařenová, Eva - Majtaz, C. - Pavelka, Marian
    Different harvest intensity and soil CO2 efflux in sessile oak coppice forests.
    iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry. Roč. 9, feb (2016), s. 546-552. ISSN 1971-7458. E-ISSN 1971-7458
    R&D Projects: GA MŠMT(CZ) LO1415; GA MŠMT(CZ) EE2.3.20.0267
    Research Infrastructure: CzeCOS II - 90061
    Institutional support: RVO:67179843
    Keywords : Low Forest * Soil Moisture * Soil Respiration * Temperature Dependence
    Subject RIV: GK - Forestry
    Impact factor: 1.623, year: 2016

    Soil CO2 efflux accounts for about 45-80% of total ecosystem respiration and is therefore an important part of the ecosystem carbon cycle. Soil CO2 efflux has been poorly studied in forests managed in the ancient coppicing manner. In our study, soil CO2 efflux, temperature, and moisture were measured in sessile oak stands with different harvesting intensity (control: 0% intensity; V1: 75%; V2: 80 %; V3: 85%; and V4: 100%) during the fifth and sixth years after harvesting. Soil CO2 efflux was in the range 2-8 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1 and indicated an increasing pattern with increasing harvesting intensity. The slope of that pattern became less steep from the fifth to the sixth year after harvesting, thus indicating gradual recovery of soil carbon dynamics in the coppiced stand toward the equilibrium state existing before harvesting. Temperature sensitivity of soil CO2 efflux ranged between 2.1 and 2.8, with the lowest values measured in the control stand. Soil CO2 efflux in the control stand was more sensitive to changes in soil moisture than was that on harvested plots. By our calculations, 6.2 tC ha-1 was released from the control stand and 6.2-6.8 tC ha-1 from the harvested stands during the sixth year after harvesting. If mean temperature were to rise by 1 °C, the amount of soil carbon released would increase by 7.7% in the control stand and, depending on harvesting intensity, by 9.0-10.8% in the harvested stands.
    Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0261479

     
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.