Mezi analýzou, revizí a popularizací. Historie literární teorie podle Lubomíra Doležela

0585991 - ÚČL 2025 RIV CZ cze J - Journal Article
Fořt, Bohumil
Mezi analýzou, revizí a popularizací. Historie literární teorie podle Lubomíra Doležela.
[Between analysis, revision and popularization. The history of literary theory according to Lubomír Doležel.]
Česká literatura. Roč. 72, č. 2 (2024), s. 185-203. ISSN 0009-0468. E-ISSN 2571-094X
R&D Projects: GA ČR(CZ) GA23-07318S
Research Infrastructure: CLB III - 90243
Institutional support: RVO:68378068
Keywords : Lubomír Doležel * structural poetics * structural linguistics * literary theory * stylistics
OECD category: Specific literatures
Impact factor: <0.1, year: 2022
Method of publishing: Open access
https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/uuid/uuid:56922c42-5b9f-4279-928b-6e568b002792

Jednou z oblastí, v nichž si Lubomír Doležel vybudoval domácí i světové renomé, je historie literární teorie. Bádání v této oblasti představuje jeden ze základních leitmotivů autorova celoživot­ního díla. Studie sleduje tento leitmotiv v jeho historických a interdisciplinárních souvislostech a zaměřuje se na jeho důležité milníky.

This study focuses on one of the most central leitmotifs in Lubomír Doležel’s lifetime work, the history of literary theory. This leitmotif offers an opportunity to follow the development of a substantial part of the work delivered by one of the most prominent theoreticians of Czech origin. Hence this leitmotif is followed from the author’s early involvement in analyses of contemporary and historic linguistic concepts, through his analyses of concepts based on the traditions of formalist and structuralist poetics and aesthetics, to his insights into post-modernist and post-structuralist theoretical issues. The study is based on the author’s studies and monographic works of which Occidental Poetics: Tradition and Progress, published in 1990, is the most highly acclaimed in the international context. All the concepts and terms used in the study are viewed and analysed in the broader context of the development of Doležel’s own theoretical work.
Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0353614