Number of the records: 1  

Tertiary succession—do we really need the new term? Response to Rapson (2023)

  1. 1.
    0576529 - BÚ 2024 RIV US eng J - Journal Article
    Prach, Karel
    Tertiary succession—do we really need the new term? Response to Rapson (2023).
    Restoration Ecology. Roč. 31, č. 7 (2023), č. článku e13892. ISSN 1061-2971. E-ISSN 1526-100X
    Institutional support: RVO:67985939
    Keywords : primary succession * restoration * secondary succession * tertiary succession
    OECD category: Ecology
    Impact factor: 3.2, year: 2022
    Method of publishing: Limited access
    https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13892

    The term tertiary succession which follows restoration measures was introduced recently as a complement to primary and secondary succession. However, its widespread use is not justified ecologically. It seems rather formalistic and does not contribute to a better linking of successional theory and practical ecological restoration. The arguments questioning the use of this term are summarized here.
    Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0346086

     
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.