Number of the records: 1
The discrepancy between the indentation curves obtained by the finite element method calculation with a Berkovich and a conical indenter
- 1.0565030 - ÚT 2023 RIV US eng J - Journal Article
Kovář, J. - Fuis, Vladimír - Čtvrtlík, Radim - Tomáštík, Jan
The discrepancy between the indentation curves obtained by the finite element method calculation with a Berkovich and a conical indenter.
Journal of Materials Research. Roč. 37, č. 10 (2022), s. 1750-1761. ISSN 0884-2914. E-ISSN 2044-5326
R&D Projects: GA TA ČR TN01000038
Institutional support: RVO:61388998 ; RVO:68378271
Keywords : nanoindentation * computing * elastic properties * fused silica * Ni
OECD category: Applied mechanics; Materials engineering (FZU-D)
Impact factor: 2.7, year: 2022 ; AIS: 0.541, rok: 2022
Method of publishing: Limited access
Result website:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43578-022-00574-6DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00574-6
Nanoindentation is an experimental technique used for the determination of Young modulus. The commonly used Oliver-Pharr analysis based on the assumption of the equivalence of indentation curves obtained with a Berkovich and a conical indenter is employed. Nevertheless, a break-down of this equivalence in projected area between the pyramidal and conical geometry was found. This discrepancy leads to an overestimation of Young modulus and needs to be corrected with coefficient β. It corrects the difference between Young modulus from the conical and the Berkovich indentation but cannot correct the indentation curves. This paper aims at the FEM study of modelling of the nanoindentation test, the influence of the Oliver-Pharr analysis assumptions, the comparison and unification of the different values of β for the Berkovich and the conical indentation with a rigid and a diamond indenter, the correction of the indentation curves, and the explanation of the differences between the FEM calculated and experimentally measured indentation curves.
Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0337616File Download Size Commentary Version Access 0565030_fuis_The discrepancy.pdf 0 3.2 MB Author´s preprint require
Number of the records: 1