Number of the records: 1  

Charcoals as indicators of historical mortar age of medieval Czech castle Pysolec

  1. 1.
    0562349 - ÚJF 2023 RIV NL eng J - Journal Article
    Pachnerová Brabcová, Kateřina - Kundrát, Pavel - Petrová, Markéta - Krofta, Tomáš - Suchý, Václav - Valášek, Vojtěch - John, David - Kozlovcev, Petr - Kotková, Kristýna - Fialová, Anna - Válek, Jan - Světlík, Ivo - Povinec, P. P.
    Charcoals as indicators of historical mortar age of medieval Czech castle Pysolec.
    Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B. Roč. 528, OCT (2022), s. 8-14. ISSN 0168-583X. E-ISSN 1872-9584
    R&D Projects: GA MŠMT EF16_019/0000728; GA MK(CZ) DG20P02OVV028
    Keywords : AMS dating * charcoals * mortars * radiocarbon
    OECD category: Atomic, molecular and chemical physics (physics of atoms and molecules including collision, interaction with radiation, magnetic resonances, Mössbauer effect); Materials engineering (UTAM-F)
    Impact factor: 1.3, year: 2022
    Method of publishing: Limited access
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2022.07.015

    Radiocarbon dating of charcoals and small pieces of wood collected from mortar in the torso of bergfried and buttress of the medieval Pys ˇolec castle was performed using accelerator mass spectrometers. Altogether, 37 samples were collected, of which 33 samples passed pre-processing criteria and chemical treatment and were dated. Two of them were Palaeolithic charcoals of likely sedimentary origin, one wood sample corresponded to a younger intrusion, six represented 'old wood' likely aged about 200 years when built in, and 24 originated from 'young wood' presumably not older than 50 years at the time of building. This highlights the need to collect large enough sample set when dating architectural remains using charcoals or wood splinters. As a rule of thumb, collecting at least 10 samples is recommended. Otherwise, the dating might not be feasible at all or may yield unrealistically old estimates, by as much as 200 years for medieval castles.
    Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0334686

     
    FileDownloadSizeCommentaryVersionAccess
    0562349_erratum.pdf4254.9 KBPublisher’s postprintopen-access
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.