Challenges to and Strategies for the Climate Village Program Plus: A Lesson Learned from Indonesia

0558027 - ÚVGZ 2023 RIV CH eng J - Journal Article
Wiati, C. - Dharmawan, I. - Sakuntaladewi, N. - Ekawati, S. - Wahyuni, T. - Maharani, R. - Hadiyan, Y. - Naibaho, Y. - Satria, W. - Ngatiman, N. - Abdurachman, A. - Karmilasanti, K. - Laksmita, A. - Angi, E. - Khadka, Chiranjeewee
Challenges to and Strategies for the Climate Village Program Plus: A Lesson Learned from Indonesia.
Sustainability. Roč. 14, č. 9 (2022), č. článku 5530. E-ISSN 2071-1050
R&D Projects: GA MŠMT(CZ) LM2018123
Institutional support: RVO:86652079
Keywords : sustainability * Climate Village Program plus * emission reduction * forest * policy * socio-economic
OECD category: Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Impact factor: 3.9, year: 2022
Method of publishing: Open access
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5530

The Climate Village Program (CVP) is one of the national flagship programs of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia to support emission reduction and climate resilience. This paper examines the challenges and strategies for implementing the climate village program in the national and sub-national contexts. Data and information derived from discussions, seminars, focus group discussions, and interviews with local government officials in East Kalimantan were used to analyze the social learning of the CVP plus, including those on the policy process and its concept, integration program, and implementation. Sustainable strategies need to be addressed by integrating the CVP plus into the medium-term development plan of the region. The challenges and way forward of the CVP plus could be an excellent lesson for implementation in all provinces of Indonesia to support FOLU (Forest Other Land Use) Net Sinker 2030 and LTS-LCCR (Long-Term Strategy on Low Carbon and Climate Resilience) 2050. Key challenges and strategies for the CVP plus are highlighted in the planning and implementation phases, especially in improving climate resilience. This study also points out the steps of implementation of the CVP, development partners and their roles in relation to climate change and other socio-economic facts that make it difficult to engage real stakeholders in the implementation of the CVP plus.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0331866