Negative effects of undesirable fish on common carp production and overall structure and functioning of fishpond ecosystems.

0556521 - BC 2023 RIV NL eng J - Journal Article
Kajgrová, L. - Blabolil, Petr - Drozd, B. - Roy, K. - Regenda, J. - Šorf, M. - Vrba, Jaroslav
Negative effects of undesirable fish on common carp production and overall structure and functioning of fishpond ecosystems.
Aquaculture. Roč. 549, Feb (2022), č. článku 737811. ISSN 0044-8486. E-ISSN 1873-5622
R&D Projects: GA MŠMT(CZ) EF16_025/0007417; GA MZe(CZ) QK1920011
Institutional support: RVO:60077344
Keywords : gudgeon pseudorasbora-parva * long-term changes * topmouth gudgeon * community composition * management * Invasive species * Top-down control * Zooplankton * Zoobenthos * Ecosystem functioning * Pond farming
OECD category: Fishery
Impact factor: 4.5, year: 2022
Method of publishing: Limited access
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737811

Planktivorous undesirable fish may threaten both fishpond ecosystem functioning and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) farming. The present study revealed a mechanistic understanding of the adverse ecosystem and pro-duction impacts that topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva), an invasive omnivorous fish species from Asia, could represent for eutrophic fishponds in South Bohemia (Czechia). In an outdoor experiment conducted under natural conditions, six similar ponds of small size (ca. 1 ha) were similarly stocked with the same size-class common carps (1+ year-old age cohort). Three ponds were additionally stocked with heterogenous size-class of topmouth gudgeon, other three were control ponds (stocked solely with common carp). Our sampling covered one vegetation season from March to September 2020. Environmental parameters, fish and zooplankton assemblage were sampled monthly, while zoobenthos bimonthly (in April, June and August). To assess the potential effect of overall fish predation and its change during the season, we calculated a fish stock index combining fish density and biomass at the time, referred as FSIC for stocked fish (common carp) and FSIU for undesirable fish (topmouth gudgeon). Some tenfold increase in FSIU reflected an overall effect of topmouth gudgeon predation. Significantly (p < 0.05) lower FSIC indeed indicated the adverse effect of topmouth gudgeon on the carp populations compared to the control ponds since August. Our results clearly showed a significant top-down effect of topmouth gudgeon on planktonic crustaceans, especially large Daphnia spp. and other cladoceran species. The complete elimination of cladocerans in the second half of the growing season probably contributed to impaired growth of carp and increased consumption of zoobenthos observed in the undesirable fishponds. Our study suggested indeed that water transparency, often used as a simple indicator of water quality in fishponds, did not correspond well with the ecological status, not even biodiversity, of the fishponds under study. The voracious undesirable fish overexploited zooplankton and significantly out-competed commercially reared common carp, which then switched more to foraging on zoobenthos. Thus, efficient eradicating undesirable fish seems to be a superior tool for overall restoring the eutrophic fishpond ecosystems and improving their ecological status.
Permanent Link: https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0340299