Number of the records: 1  

Affiblot: a dot blot-based screening device for selection of reliable antibodies

  1. 1.
    0545112 - ÚIACH 2022 RIV GB eng J - Journal Article
    Svobodová, Z. - Novotný, Jakub - Ospalková, B. - Slováková, M. - Bílková, Z. - Foret, František
    Affiblot: a dot blot-based screening device for selection of reliable antibodies.
    Analytical Methods: advancing methods and applications. Roč. 13, č. 35 (2021), s. 3874-3884. ISSN 1759-9660. E-ISSN 1759-9679
    Grant - others:AV ČR(CZ) MSM200312001
    Program: Program na podporu mezinárodní spolupráce začínajících výzkumných pracovníků
    Institutional support: RVO:68081715
    Keywords : binding reagents * rubella * validation
    OECD category: Analytical chemistry
    Impact factor: 3.532, year: 2021
    Method of publishing: Limited access

    The key factor in the development of antibody-based assays is to find an antibody that has an appropriate affinity, high specificity, and low cross-reactivity. However, this task is not easy to carry out since the research antibodies on the market may suffer from low specificity and reproducibility. Here, we report on a palm-sized dot blot-based device, called the affiblot, that has a specially designed lid that allows simultaneous semi-quantitative comparison of up to five antibodies from different suppliers regarding their affinity/avidity, cross-reactivity, and batch-to-batch reliability. The only required peripheral equipment is a vacuum pump, a camera, and densitometry software. The affiblot device was tested for its functionality and its measurements were compared against those obtained by standard dot blot and ELISA. The benefit over these methods, when various antibodies are evaluated, is in its simplicity. It allows easy antigen deposition, fast application and the discarding of the solutions, a compact undivided membrane, and therefore significant decrease of labor. The device was tested with specific anti-ApoE, anti-EpCAM, anti-Salmonella, anti-E. coli, and anti-Listeria antibodies from different suppliers. Their properties were compared for their ability to interact specifically with antigen and/or non-target structures and the best-suited antibody for the intended application was identified.
    Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0321871

     
    FileDownloadSizeCommentaryVersionAccess
    0545112.pdf21.4 MBAuthor’s postprintrequire
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.