Number of the records: 1  

Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research

  1. 1.
    0539085 - ÚGN 2021 RIV CH eng J - Journal Article
    Andráško, Ivan
    Why people (do not) adopt the private precautionary and mitigation measures: A review of the issue from the perspective of recent flood risk research.
    Water. Roč. 13, č. 2 (2021), č. článku 140. ISSN 2073-4441. E-ISSN 2073-4441
    R&D Projects: GA ČR(CZ) GA20-11782S
    Institutional support: RVO:68145535
    Keywords : floods * flood risk management * mitigation measures * behavior * risk perception * experience * flood risk research
    OECD category: Environmental sciences (social aspects)
    Impact factor: 3.530, year: 2021 ; AIS: 0.521, rok: 2021
    Method of publishing: Open access
    Result website:
    https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/2/140/htmDOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020140

    Based on the literature review, this paper synthesizes recent state of knowledge on flood risk perception and related human behaviors. The main attention is paid to private precautionary and mitigation measures, and the reasons why these are (not) adopted by agents such as individual households. Results of a wide range of relevant studies are presented and critically examined. The findings are presented within an interpretive framework established during the review process, six key themes (responsibility, risk perception, people and social environment, geography of risk, emotions, theories and conceptual models) and several sub-themes closely related to them were identified by the content/thematic analysis. These were then utilized to overview and discuss particular factors and issues involved, as well as various relevant theoretical underpinnings and conceptual models. The review identifies, illustrates, and addresses not only the consensual views and contradictory findings of flood risk research, but also several related and essential ambiguities, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps. Based on these findings, suggestions for future research are discussed, including the terminological, semantic, methodological, theoretical, and ethical aspects. The paper thus serves two main tasks: (a) It is a useful reference/departure point for those with research interests in topics and issues such as flood risk perception, flood risk protective and mitigation behaviors and measures, or flood risk management in general, and (b) it provides suggestions and incentives for future flood risk research agenda.
    Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0316838
     
    FileDownloadSizeCommentaryVersionAccess
    UGN_0539085.pdf22.1 MBOtheropen-access
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.