Root growth and presence of Rhizophagus irregularis distinctly alter substrate hydraulic properties in a model system with Medicago truncatula

0537020 - MBÚ 2021 RIV NL eng J - Journal Article
Pauwels, R. - Jansa, Jan - Püschel, David - Müller, A. - Graefe, J. - Kolb, S. - Bitterlich, M.
Root growth and presence of Rhizophagus irregularis distinctly alter substrate hydraulic properties in a model system with Medicago truncatula.
Plant and Soil. Roč. 457, 1-2 (2020), s. 131-151. ISSN 0032-079X. E-ISSN 1573-5036
R&D Projects: GA ČR(CZ) GA17-12166S
Institutional support: RVO:61388971 ; RVO:67985939
Keywords : Arbuscular mycorrhiza * Hyphae * Medicago truncatula * Root-free compartments * Roots * Soil hydraulic properties * Water relations * Water retention
OECD category: Microbiology; Ecology (BU-J)
Impact factor: 4.192, year: 2020
Method of publishing: Open access
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11104-020-04723-w

Aim: We investigated how substrate hydraulic properties respond to the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in root-containing and root-free substrate zones in a Medicago truncatula-Rhizophagus irregularis model system. Methods: Before planting, two compartments constructed from standard soil sampling cores (250 cm3) were implanted into non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal pots containing a sand-zeolite-soil mix. One compartment allowed root penetration (1 mm mesh cover) and the other only hyphal ingrowth (42 μm mesh cover). After eight weeks of growth under maintenance of moist conditions, the cores were subjected to water retention measurements. Additionally, we measured water retention of bare substrates before and after drying events to check for successful maintenance of moist conditions in pots. Results: Drying of bare substrates decreased water retention, but planting at least sustained it. The parameters of water retention models responded linearly to root morphological traits across mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal substrates. Hyphae-only colonization comparatively affected the course of water retention in ways that suggest increased pore space heterogeneity while maintaining water storage capacity of substrates. Conclusions: Hence, water contents corresponded to different substrate matric potentials in non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal pots. We conclude that changes to water retention in AMF colonized substrates can contribute to a widely observed phenomenon, i.e. that mycorrhizal plants differ in their moisture stress response from non-mycorrhizal plants.
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0314778