Banking, debt, and currency crises: early warning indicators for developed countries

0387961 - NHU-C 2013 RIV DE eng V - Research Report
Babecký, J. - Havránek, T. - Matějů, Jakub - Rusnák, Marek - Šmídková, K. - Vašíček, B.
Banking, debt, and currency crises: early warning indicators for developed countries.
Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank, 2012. 43 s. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1485. ISSN 1725-2806
R&D Projects: GA MŠMT(CZ) SVV 265801/2012
Institutional support: PRVOUK-P23
Keywords : early warning indicators * Bayesian model averaging * macro-prudential policies
Subject RIV: AH - Economics
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp1485.pdf

We construct and explore a new quarterly dataset covering crisis episodes in 40 developed countries over 1970–2010. First, we examine stylized facts of banking, debt, and currency crises. Banking turmoil was most frequent in developed economies. Using panel vector autoregression, we confirm that currency and debt crises are typically preceded by banking crises, but not vice versa. Banking crises are also the most costly in terms of the overall output loss, and output takes about six years to recover. Second, we try to identify early warning indicators of crises specific to developed economies, accounting for model uncertainty by means of Bayesian model averaging. Our results suggest that onsets of banking and currency crises tend to be preceded by booms in economic activity. In particular, we find that growth of domestic private credit, increasing FDI inflows, rising money market rates as well as increasing world GDP and inflation were common leading indicators of banking crises. Currency crisis onsets were typically preceded by rising money market rates, but also by worsening government balances and falling central bank reserves. Early warning indicators of debt crisis are difficult to uncover due to the low occurrence of such episodes in our dataset. Finally, employing a signaling approach we show that using a composite early warning index increases the usefulness of the model when compared to using the best single indicator (domestic private credit).
Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0216814