Number of the records: 1  

Why is the slip direction in CuZn and FeAl different than in CoTi?

  1. 1.
    0351369 - FZÚ 2011 RIV GB eng J - Journal Article
    Paidar, Václav - Lin, Y.-S. - Čák, Miroslav - Vítek, V.
    Why is the slip direction in CuZn and FeAl different than in CoTi?
    Intermetallics. Roč. 18, č. 7 (2010), s. 1285-1287. ISSN 0966-9795. E-ISSN 1879-0216.
    [Discussion Meeting on the Development of Innovative Iron Aluminium Alloys /5./. Praha, 21.09.2009-24.09.2009]
    R&D Projects: GA AV ČR IAA100100920; GA MŠMT OC09014
    Institutional research plan: CEZ:AV0Z10100520; CEZ:AV0Z20410507
    Keywords : aluminides * mechanical properties * theory * superdislocations
    Subject RIV: BM - Solid Matter Physics ; Magnetism
    Impact factor: 2.327, year: 2010

    In B2 compounds the slip plane is {110} and the slip direction is often 001 which is the shortest lattice vector in this structure. It is shown by comparing the three compounds CuZn, FeAl and CoTi that factors governing the choice of the slip direction are more varied. They are, in particular the elastic anisotropy, types of planar faults on {110} planes with which dislocations can dissociate and the energy of these faults that is not simply related to the order-disorder transition temperature. It is explained why in FeAl the slip system is the same as in CuZn, i.e., 111{110}.
    Permanent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11104/0191136

     
     
Number of the records: 1  

  This site uses cookies to make them easier to browse. Learn more about how we use cookies.