Influence of the Surface Condition of Specimens on the Size of Coherently Diffracting Domains

Article Preview

Abstract:

Metallic sample preparation process from cutting to polishing introduces defects into the subsurface layers by plastic deformation. Methods of bulk sample characterization are usually sensitive to the microstructure and presence of defects e.g. dislocations, grain boundaries, etc. near the surface. The X-ray diffraction technique (XRD) is a unique method used primarily for phase identification and quantification of crystalline materials. The extending of the method by the whole pattern fitting using Rietveld refinement analysis enables also utilisation for other purposes such as determination of the size of coherently diffracting domains (CDD). This property quantifies the degree of disorder in material and is usually correlated with mean crystallite size, i.e. subgrain size. However, since the penetration depth of the laboratory X-ray radiation is limited to the order of tens of micrometers (depending on the material), the observed result is highly affected by the density of defects such as dislocations in the surface area of the specimen and thus by their surface condition. The effect of the different final steps of grinding and polishing on the observed size of CDD was studied and discussed for two materials - aluminum Al7075 alloy and high entropy alloy HfNbTaTiZr. The reasonable finishing for the optimal results was found for both materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 270)

Pages:

124-129

Citation:

Online since:

November 2017

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.M. Rietveld, A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, (1969) 65–71.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Zyka, Structure and Mechanical Properties of TaNbHfZrTi High Entropy Alloy, METAL 2015, Conference Proceedings (2015).

Google Scholar

[3] A.A. Coelho, TOPAS version 5 (Computer Software), Coelho Software, Brisbane, (2016).

Google Scholar

[4] R.W. Cheary, A. Coelho, A fundamental parameters approach to X-ray line-profile fitting, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25 (1992) 109–121.

DOI: 10.1107/s0021889891010804

Google Scholar

[5] W.A. Dollase, Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model, J. Appl. Cryst. 19 (1986) 267-272.

DOI: 10.1107/s0021889886089458

Google Scholar

[6] M. Warmuzek, Metallographic Techniques for Aluminium and Its Alloys, in: G.F. V. Voort (Ed. ), ASM Handbook Volume 9: Metallography and Microstructures, ASM International, Materials Park, 2004, pp.711-751.

DOI: 10.31399/asm.hb.v09.a0003769

Google Scholar

[7] L.E. Samuels,  Metallographic Polishing by Mechanical Methods, fourth ed., ASM International, Materials Park, (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] O.N. Senkov, J.M. Scott, S.V. Senkova, D.B. Miracle, C.F. Woodward, Microstructure and room temperature properties of a high-entropy TaNbHfZrTi alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 6043–6048.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.02.171

Google Scholar

[9] O.N. Senkov, J.M. Scott, S.V. Senkova, F. Meisenkothen, D.B. Miracle, C.F. Woodward, Microstructure and elevated temperature properties of a refractory TaNbHfZrTi alloy, J. Mater. Sci. 47 (2012) 4062–4074.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6260-2

Google Scholar