Release of greenhouse gases from millipedes as related to food, body size, and other factors
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The release of greenhouse gases (GHG) from the intestinal tracts of animals warrants study not only due to its possible effects on GHG concentration in the Earth's atmosphere and therefore on climate change, but also as an important indicator of intestinal microbial processes. The intestines of millipedes represent natural models of fermenting bioreactors that are colonized by taxonomically rich and functionally diverse microbial communities; as such, these communities are useful for studying microbial interactions and as sources of novel organisms (Brune, 1998). The microbiome of millipede guts is rich in several groups of archaea, bacteria, and fungi responsible for a wide range of biological and biochemical processes. Byzov (2006) reviewed microbiological studies of almost 30 species of millipedes, and most of the studies were based on routine isolation techniques and microscopy. Our knowledge about cultivable microorganisms and their enzymatic potential in the intestines of tropical millipedes was subsequently increased by Ramanathan and Alagesan (2012). Ambarish and Sridhar (2015) documented the changes in the diversity and abundance of cultivable heterotrophic microorganisms in the food (leaf litter), guts, and feces of two giant pill-millipedes. Nardi et al. (2016) described the ultrastructural distribution of microorganisms in the hindgut of the spirostreptid millipede Cambala speobia. Glukhova et al. (2018) assessed the antibiotic activity of actinomycetes isolated from a polydesmid millipede.
The classical isolation methods used in the studies cited in the previous paragraph fail to detect non-cultivable microorganisms. The use of molecular tools to detect non-cultivable microorganisms associated with millipedes began with the work of Oravecz et al. (2002), who assessed the microbial community in millipede feces. Using fingerprinting analysis, Knapp et al. (2009) found that the gut microbial community in the millipede Cylindroiulus fulviceps differed from the community in the food source and was not greatly affected by diet change. In a subsequent study, Knapp et al. (2010) also used molecular methods to determine that the community of gut bacteria in C. fulviceps is similar to communities previously found in the intestinal tracts of termites and beetles, which are known to harbor symbiotic bacteria essential for digestive activity. Šustr et al. (2014) used molecular profiling (DGGE) to compare communities of methanogenic archaea in 35 species and 17 families of tropical and temperate millipedes; the authors detected sequences related to Methanosarcinales, Methanobacteriales, Methanomicrobiales, and some unclassified archaea.
The intestines of millipedes also contains eukaryotic commensals or parasites such as nematodes (Kitagami et al., 2019) and ciliates (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994), which in turn contain endosymbiotic or associated prokaryotes. Ciliates were found mainly in the hindgut of spirostreptid and spirobolid millipedes (Tuzet et al., 1957).
Methane (CH4), which has the second-largest effect on global warming after carbon dioxide (CO2), is released into the atmosphere from natural gas and petroleum deposits and is also produced during many industrial operations (IPCC, 2001). Another significant source of CH4 is a specific group of microorganisms, i.e., the methanogens (Dlugokencky et al., 2011). Methanogenic archaea, which are an ancient group of microorganisms that occupy ecological niches with limited oxygen concentrations including the digestive tracts of animals, are the only known biogenic source of CH4 (Ehhalt, 1974). CH4 emission from vertebrate hosts (Crutzen et al., 1986) as well as from invertebrate hosts (Breznak, 1982, Cruden and Markovetz, 1987, Gijzen et al., 1991, Rasmussen and Khalil, 1983) was discovered already many years ago. Among invertebrates, termites are recognized as a globally important source of CH4 in that they are responsible for between 5 and 19% of the global CH4 emissions (Jamali et al., 2011). CH4 production and the presence of symbiotic methanogens have been systematically screened in a wide variety of invertebrate taxa (Bijnen et al., 1996, Hackstein and Stumm, 1994, Rosenberg and Hackstein, 1995, Sprenger et al., 2000, Šustr and Šimek, 2009, Šustr et al., 2014). Based on the taxonomic groups of arthropods studied to date, CH4 production is restricted to millipedes, cockroaches, beetles (Cetonidae), and termites (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994). The symbiotic associations involving methanogens and CH4 production are likely to be a characteristic property of the host taxon (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994, Šustr et al., 2014).
Because they apparently include producers as well as non-producers of CH4, millipedes are useful for determining which factors influence gut methanogenesis. Among millipedes, species that release CH4 have been mostly found in the juliform orders Julida, Spirobolida, and Spirostreptida. The irregular taxonomic distribution of CH4 production is correlated with the presence of the methanogen-specific mcrA gene (Šustr et al., 2014). The qualitative and quantitative variability in CH4 production among millipede species and taxonomic units seems to reflect the suppression or activation of methanogenic archaea in the digestive tract rather than a fundamental inability to host methanogens (Šustr et al., 2014).
Methane-producing millipede taxa also appear to differ in the functional groups of methanogens that they host. An important part of the taxonomic variability in the presence and quantity of CH4 emission from millipedes may be related to differences in body size (Šustr et al., 2014). This variability may also result from the presence in large tropical species of anaerobic ciliate protists that host intracellular methanogenic archaea (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994) and from the unique feeding habits of some taxa (Šustr et al., 2014). Although a number of branches of the millipede phylogenetic tree have been investigated with regard to the CH4 releasing, several branches remain unexplored.
In addition to great taxonomic variability in CH4 production by millipedes, methanogenic community structure varies greatly among gut and faecal pellet samples, and CH4 production varies substantially among individual millipedes of the same species (Šustr et al., 2014). Except for temperature (Šustr and Šimek, 2009), however, the external factors that affect CH4 emission by millipedes have not been examined.
Millipedes represent an exception to the typical anatomy of methane-releasing arthropods in that their hindgut lacks an enlarged pouch, which is typical of other methane-producing invertebrates (Hackstein and Stumm, 1994). However, the inner surface of the millipede hindgut is strongly developed and is covered with structures of various shapes (Hopkin and Read, 1992) that facilitate microbial colonization (Byzov, 2006). According to Hopkin and Read (1992) and Byzov (2006), there is no evidence that millipedes possess a permanent symbiotic microflora similar to that of termites. It follows that food type and feeding regime might affect the production of CH4 by millipedes. However, most reports have documented that the millipede intestinal tract contains a stable indigenous microbial community that includes facultative anaerobes that can degrade recalcitrant organic polymers.
Another GHG that could be potentially produced by millipedes is nitrous oxide (N2O). N2O is an important intermediate and by-product of a number of microbial nitrogen transformations including denitrification. Denitrification is performed by many facultative anaerobic bacteria in habitats in which organic substrates are readily available but oxygen is not. Those conditions occur in the intestinal tracts of various invertebrates, and N2O release has been confirmed from living earthworms (Karsten and Drake, 1997), some termites (Brauman et al., 2015), and several aquatic invertebrates (Stief et al., 2009). Data suggest that a significant proportion of soil-derived N2O emissions might be directly or indirectly related to earthworms (Karsten and Drake, 1997, Matthies et al., 1999). However, the release of N2O by many other soil invertebrate groups due to microbial communities in their guts remains largely unknown (Drake et al., 2006). Accordingly, there is no information on N2O emissions from millipedes.
CO2 is produced by aerobic as well as anaerobic organisms when they metabolize organic compounds to produce energy. In addition to being the most significant GHG in Earth's atmosphere, its rate of production is a useful indicator of the metabolic rate of animals and of general microbial activity. The efflux of CO2 from the soil, which is also termed soil respiration, is the major pathway by which carbon exits terrestrial ecosystems (Ryan and Law, 2005). CO2 output from a living animal may be interpreted as a measure of its metabolic rate but is affected by the type of food being metabolised, by internal pH changes, and by the activity of intestinal aerobic as well as anaerobic microorganisms. CO2 production has often been used to estimate the intensity of invertebrate metabolism (Mitchell, 1973, Reichle, 1977, Šimek and Šustr, 1995), but the portion of the evolved CO2 produced by their intestinal microorganisms has rarely been considered.
As noted earlier, the only external factor known to affect CH4 emission by millipedes is temperature (Šustr and Šimek, 2009); the possible effects of other external factors have not been assessed. In addition, there is no information about the relationship between the metabolic release of CO2 and the release of other gases, about N2O emissions from millipedes, or about the ability of millipedes to cover their metabolic energy expenses from cellulose digestion. In the current study, we attempted to fill these knowledge gaps and also to determine how gas emissions are affected by food type. In a series of laboratory microcosm experiments, we studied the effects of four food sources (alder, oak, and maple leaf litter, and rotten wood) on 12 species of millipedes. The food types were selected because they represent natural food of the most European forest millipedes and because they differ in nitrogen content. Alder leaf litter contains highest amount of nitrogen, probably due to the symbiosis of alder trees with nitrogen-fixing Frankia (Sellstedt et al., 1986). Previous research demonstrated that millipedes prefer some species of leaf litter and that millipede assimilation efficiency differs among food types (Tajovský, 1992). Finally, we determined the ability of two julid species to obtain energy from pure cellulose diet and the effect of this diet on CH4, CO2, and N2O production. We tested five hypotheses: 1) At least some millipede species can release N2O; 2) There are inter-species differences in the release of GHG from millipedes; 3) Release of GHG from millipedes is affected by food type (leaf litter species or rotten wood); 4) Release of these gases is prevented by starvation; and 5) The metabolic rate (as indicated by CO2 production) is higher for millipedes reared on a cellulose diet than for millipedes that are starved, indicating that at least some species of millipedes are able to obtain energy from pure cellulose.
Section snippets
Animals
For experiments concerning food type and feeding regime, 12 species were chosen (Table 1). Three of these species belonged to the tropical orders of giant millipedes and were purchased in a pet shop or were obtained from individual breeders in the Czech Republic (original distribution Africa): Epibolus pulchripes, Pachybolidae (order Spirobolida), Telodeinopus aoutii, Spirostreptidae (Spirostreptida), and Archispirostreptus gigas, Spirostreptidae (Spirostreptida). Three of the species represent
Weight-specific CH4 production by millipedes as affected by food type (experiments 1 and 2)
In experiment 1, the weight-specific CH4 production rate was significantly higher for the tropical Spirobolida and Spirostreptida (E. pulchripes, A. gigas, and T. aoutii) than for the other tested species (two-way ANOVA, differences between species, F8,107 = 20.04, p < 0.0001, Fig. 1A). For species feeding on rotten wood, the differences in CH4 production between Julida members and glomerids were not significant (one-way ANOVA, F2,12 = 3.03, p = 0.08).
More CH4 was released from millipedes that
Discussion
The assessment of GHG released by millipedes indicates that all millipedes release CO2 and that some species release CH4; small releases of N2O were also occasionally detected. Stable and substantial CH4 production was restricted to the large millipedes in the tropical orders Spirobolida and Spirostreptida, which host anaerobic ciliates in their hindgut (Tuzet et al., 1957, Hackstein and Stumm, 1994). CH4 production was clearly related to millipede taxonomy, which might be explained by the
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Linda Jíšová for assistance in laboratory analyses and Bruce A. Jaffee for language revision. Last version of manuscript was discussed with Dr P. Sardar. The research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR) (project No. 17-22572S) by BC CAS, ISB & SoWa and International Mobilities of Researchers of the Biology Centre (MEYS; projects LM2015075, EF16_013/0001782 and CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/16_027/008357).
References (60)
- et al.
Verwertung von Kohlenhydraten bei Oniscus asellus (Isopoda) und Polydesmus angustus (Diplopoda)
Pedobiologia
(1981) Direct potentiometric determination of redox potentials of the gut contents in the termites Zootermopsis nevadensis and Cubitermes severus and in three other arthropods
Journal of Insect Physiology
(1984)Relative assimilations of 14C-labelled microbial tissues and 14C-plant fibre ingested with leaf litter by the millipede Glomeris marginata under experimental conditions
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
(1989)Termite guts: the world's smallest bioreactors
Trends in Biotechnology
(1998)- et al.
Fibre digestion in arthropods
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A Physiology
(1997) - et al.
Diurnal and seasonal variations in CH4 flux from termite mounds in tropical savannas of the Northern Territory, Australia
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
(2011) - et al.
Molecular fingerprinting analysis of the gut microbiota of Cylindroiulus fulviceps (Diplopoda)
Pedobiologia
(2009) - et al.
Effects of the earthworm Eisenia andrei on methanogens in a cattle-impacted soil: a microcosm study
European Journal of Soil Biology
(2012) An improved method for microrespirometry using gas chromatography
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
(1973)- et al.
Compartmentalization of microbial communities that inhabit the hindguts of millipedes
Arthropod Structure & Development
(2016)
A molecular approach in the analysis of the faecal bacterial community in an African millipede belonging to the family Spirostreptidae (Diplopoda)
European Journal of Soil Biology
Gas chromatographic microrespirometry: further improvement and application in animal ecophysiology
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Methane release from millipedes and other soil invertebrates in Central Europe
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Microbial dynamics in food, intestine and fecal pellets of two endemic pill-millipedes (Arthrosphaera: Sphaerotheriida) of the Western Ghats
Journal of Agricultural Technology
Intracavity CO laser photoacoustic trace gas detection: cyclic CH4, H2O and CO2 emission by cockroaches and scarab beetles
Applied Optics
Millipedes. Synopsis of the British Fauna (NS) 35
Changes in the amounts of dry matter, nitrogen, carbon and energy in decomposing woodland leaf litter in relation to the activities of the soil fauna
Journal of Ecology
Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions by termites: does the feeding guild matter?
PloS One
Intestinal microbiota of termites and other xylophagous insects
Annual Review of Microbiology
Impact of forest litter of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., Alnus incana (L.) Moench, Alnus viridis (CHaix) Lam. et DC, Abies alba Mill., and Fagus sylvatica L. on chosen soil properties
Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities
Intestinal microbiota of millipedes
Microbial ecology of the cockroach gut
Annual Review of Microbiology
Methane production by domestic animals, wild ruminants, other herbivorous fauna, and humans
Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology
Global atmospheric methane: budget, changes and dangers
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
Earthworm gut microbial biomes: their importance to soil microorganisms, denitrification, and the terrestrial production of the greenhouse gas N2O
The atmospheric cycle of methane
Tellus
Atlas on the Biology of Soil Arthropods
Methanogenesis: Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry & Genetics
Methanogenic bacteria as endosymbionts of the ciliate Nyctotherus ovalis in the cockroach hindgut
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Antibiotic activity of actinobacteria from the digestive tract of millipede Nedyopus dawydoffiae (Diplopoda)
Antibiotics
Cited by (11)
Soil fauna alter the responses of greenhouse gas emissions to changes in water and nitrogen availability
2023, Soil Biology and BiochemistrySoil macrofauna: Study problems and perspectives
2021, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :The findings of numerous studies involving macrofaunal exclosure experiments conducted from the early 1960s (Kurcheva, 1960) until recently (Hättenschwiler et al., 2005; Tiunov, 2009) support the hypothesis that members of the soil macrofauna function as crushers. The guts of macrofaunal taxa are confirmed to be a source of microbes, and they have been shown to distribute the microbes to freshly crushed debris (Byzov, 2006; Šustr et al., 2020). In addition, there is also a hypothesis regarding the so-called trigger effect of the soil macrofauna (Gilyarov, 1965), which enhances the overall functioning of soil ecosystems, including microbes.
Investigating the effects of nitrogen deposition and substrates on the microbiome and mycobiome of the millipede Cherokia georgiana georgiana (Diplopoda: Polydesmida)
2021, Soil Biology and BiochemistryCitation Excerpt :It has been demonstrated that fungal communities found within Brachycybe lecontii millipedes reared on different wood species showed some differentiation in fungal communities (Macias et al., 2019). Furthermore, enzyme extractions from millipede hindguts and midguts demonstrates cellulases and chitinases are common (Šustr et al., 2020a,b), which are likely derived from extant microbial populations. This abundance of cellulases in millipede guts is likely an important component for deriving energy from cellulose rich plant matter and may explain why coprophagy is common, as it has been suggested that some xystodesmids may undergo multiple coprophagic events to aid cellulose breakdown (McBrayer, 1973).