1887

Abstract

An orange-golden iridescent culture, designated A1X5R2, was isolated from a compost soil suspension which was amended with NCTC 2665 culture supernatant. The cells were non-motile, Gram-stain-negative, 0.4–0.5 µm wide and 0.7–1.4 µm long. The 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic and whole-genome analyses revealed that strain A1X5R2 forms a distinct lineage within the family and is closely related to members of the genus (, 93.04 % similarity, and , 92.77 %). The organism grew at 22–47 °C (optimal at 37 °C), salinity <3 % (optimal at 1.5 %) and at pH 7. The major respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-10, but a small quantity of ubiquinone-9 was also detected The major polyamine was homospermidine, but a small quantity of putrescine was also detected. The strain contained Cω7, C, C ω7 and C as the major fatty acids. The main polar lipids were phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylinositol, sphingoglycolipid, diphosphatidylglycerol, two unidentified phospholipids and three unidentified amino lipids. The DNA G+C content was 64.9 mol%. According to the results of phylogenetic and phylogenomic analyses, as well as its physiological characteristics, strain A2X5R2 represents the type species of a novel genus within the family . The name gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain being A1X5R2 (=NCCB 100839=DSM 112829).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005467
2022-08-05
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold L-M et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu Q, Yang L-L, Liu H-C, Zhang G-Q, Xin Y-H. Glacieibacterium frigidum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Sphingosinicellaceae isolated from a glacier. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Qu P-H, Luo H-M, Feng J-H, Li S, Chen C et al. Sandaracinobacteroides hominis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human skin. Arch Microbiol 2021; 203:5067–5074 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ming Y-Z, Liu L, Lv A-P, Xian W-D, Liu Z-T et al. Thermaurantiacus tibetensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel moderately thermophilic bacterium isolated from hot spring microbial mat in Tibet. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2021; 114:445–455 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lopez Marin MA, Strejcek M, Junkova P, Suman J, Santrucek J et al. Exploring the potential of Micrococcus luteus culture supernatant with resuscitation-promoting factor for enhancing the culturability of soil bacteria. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:685263 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:D590–6 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 2015; 38:209–216 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wick R, Volkening J, Loman N. Porechop: adapter trimmer for Oxford Nanopore reads [Internet]. Github; 2017 https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop
  18. Wick R, Menzel P. Filtlong [Internet]. Github: 2017 https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong
  19. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017; 27:722–736 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Oxford Nanopore Technologies Ltd medaka: sequence correction provided by ONT research [Internet]. Github: Oxford Nanopore Technologies; 2021 https://github.com/nanoporetech/medaka
  21. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim D, Park S, Chun J. Introducing EzAAI: a pipeline for high throughput calculations of prokaryotic average amino acid identity. J Microbiol 2021; 59:476–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Oren A, Overmann J, Lawley TD et al. Automated analysis of genomic sequences facilitates high-throughput and comprehensive description of bacteria. ISME Commun 2021; 1:16 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis JJ, Wattam AR, Aziz RK, Brettin T, Butler R et al. The PATRIC Bioinformatics Resource Center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:D606–D612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource Center. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D535–D542 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D286–93 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Coico R. Gram Staining. In Current Protocols 2005 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rezanka T, Petránková M, Cepák V, Pribyl P, Sigler K et al. Trachydiscus minutus, a new biotechnological source of eicosapentaenoic acid. Folia Microbiol 2010; 55:265–269 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Vieira S, Huber KJ, Neumann-Schaal M, Geppert A, Luckner M et al. Usitatibacter rugosus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Usitatibacter palustris sp. nov., novel members of Usitatibacteraceae fam. nov. within the order Nitrosomonadales isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dyńska-Kukulska K, Ciesielski W, Zakrzewski R. The use of a new, modified Dittmer-Lester spray reagent for phospholipid determination by the TLC image analysis technique. Biomed Chromatogr 2013; 27:458–465 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Zech H, Thole S, Schreiber K, Kalhöfer D, Voget S et al. Growth phase-dependent global protein and metabolite profiles of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis strain DSM 17395, a member of the marine Roseobacter-clade. Proteomics 2009; 9:3677–3697 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Will SE, Henke P, Boedeker C, Huang S, Brinkmann H et al. Day and night: metabolic profiles and evolutionary relationships of six axenic non-marine cyanobacteria. Genome Biol Evol 2019; 11:270–294 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu K, Li S, Jiao N, Tang K. Pacificamonas flava gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Sphingomonadaceae isolated from the Southeastern Pacific. Curr Microbiol 2014; 69:96–101 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan Y, Wang Y, Wang D, Wang G, Zheng S. Sphingoaurantiacus capsulatus sp. nov., isolated from mountain soil, and emended description of the genus Sphingoaurantiacus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4930–4935 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim M, Kang O, Zhang Y, Ren L, Chang X et al. Sphingoaurantiacus polygranulatus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from high-Arctic tundra soil, and emended descriptions of the genera Sandarakinorhabdus, Polymorphobacter and Rhizorhabdus and the species Sandarakinorhabdus limnophila, Rhizorhabdus argentea and Sphingomonas wittichii. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:91–100 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fukuda W, Chino Y, Araki S, Kondo Y, Imanaka H et al. Polymorphobacter multimanifer gen. nov., sp. nov., a polymorphic bacterium isolated from Antarctic white rock. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2034–2040 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yurkov V, Stackebrandt E, Buss O, Vermeglio A, Gorlenko V et al. Reorganization of the genus Erythromicrobium: description of “Erythromicrobium sibiricum” as Sandaracinobacter sibiricus gen. nov., sp. nov., and of “Erythromicrobium ursincola” as Erythromonas ursincola gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:1172–1178 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gich F, Overmann J. Sandarakinorhabdus limnophila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel bacteriochlorophyll a-containing, obligately aerobic bacterium isolated from freshwater lakes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:847–854 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Maruyama T, Park H-D, Ozawa K, Tanaka Y, Sumino T et al. Sphingosinicella microcystinivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a microcystin-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:85–89 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005467
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005467
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error