Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Dust Transport on the Concentration of Chlorophyll-A in the Surface Layer of the Black Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
Tilia sp. Seed Oil—Composition, Antioxidant Activity and Potential Use
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of 3-DoF Manipulators’ Parasitic Motion with the Instantaneous Restriction Space-Based Analytic Coupling Relation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolite Profiling of Christia vespertilionis Leaf Metabolome via Molecular Network Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/app11104691
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trimethoxycinnamates and Their Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity

by
Jiri Kos
1,*,
Tomas Strharsky
1,2,
Sarka Stepankova
3,
Katarina Svrckova
3,
Michal Oravec
4,
Jan Hosek
5,
Ales Imramovsky
6 and
Josef Jampilek
1,7
1
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute, Palacky University, Slechtitelu 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 17, Listopadu 12, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic
3
Department of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentska 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic
4
Global Change Research Institute CAS, Belidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic
5
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 296/70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic
6
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentska 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic
7
Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska Cesta 9, 845 10 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(10), 4691; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104691
Submission received: 31 March 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plants: From Farm to Food and Biomedical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of twelve nature-inspired 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamates were prepared and characterized. All compounds, including the starting 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid, were tested for their ability to inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) in vitro; the selectivity index (SI) was also determined. 2-Fluororophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)-prop-2-enoate demonstrated the highest SI (1.71) in favor of BChE inhibition. 2-Chlorophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate showed the highest AChE-inhibiting (IC50 = 46.18 µM) as well as BChE-inhibiting (IC50 = 32.46 µM) activity with an SI of 1.42. The mechanism of action of the most potent compound was determined by the Lineweaver–Burk plot as a mixed type of inhibition. An in vitro cell viability assay confirmed the insignificant cytotoxicity of the discussed compounds on the two cell lines. Trends between structure, physicochemical properties and activity were discussed.

1. Introduction

Nature is an inspirational and rich source of compounds with biological effects. More than a half of all small-molecule-approved drugs between 1981 and 2014 belong to groups of natural products or mimic natural products [1]. Many plant secondary metabolites [2] have also been used as model compounds for the subsequent development of synthetic drugs [3,4,5,6]. One such example is a cinnamic acid and its derivatives, e.g., coumaric acids, caffeic acid, ferulic acid or sinapic acid, which are widely distributed in many plants and assure their many physiological processes. They also serve as precursors for other compounds in plants such as lignols, (iso)flavonoids, coumarins, aurones, stilbenes, catechin, phenylpropanoids, etc. [7].
Natural cinnamic acid also serves as a precursor for new synthetic compounds. Synthetic derivatives of cinnamic acid showed interesting antimicrobial, anticancer, antiparasitic, neurological, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities in vitro [8]. 3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic acid (TMCA) is an ingredient isolated from the root of Polygala tenuifolia Willd. (Polygalaceae), and its extracts have been used as traditional sedative drugs in China, Japan and Korea [9,10,11]. TMCA has been reported to have antidepressant, anticonvulsant and sedative activity [9,12,13]. In recent years, a large number of TMCA derivatives with various biological effects have been synthesized, such as antinarcotic [14], antitumor [15,16,17,18], antiviral [19,20], anticonvulsant [21] and anti-inflammatory [21,22] agents. Published articles indicate that TMCA and its ester and amide analogues exhibit central nervous system activity, including antinarcotic, neuroprotective, anti-Alzheimer’s and anticonvulsant effects. It involves several targets, such as 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor, prostaglandin E2 receptor 2 and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, β-amyloid peptide (1–42), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) [14,22,23,24,25].
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) accounts for 60% to 80% of dementia cases and is becoming an increasingly common disease not only in Western countries but also in low- and middle-income countries. It is estimated that more than 50 million people worldwide suffered from dementia by 2020, and that number is expected to rise to 82 million in 2030 and 152 million in 2050. For example, by the middle of the century, the estimated number of Americans aged 65 and over with AD could rise to 13.8 million, a sharp increase from the estimated 5.8 million Americans aged 65 and over who suffer from AD today. The latest available statistics from 2018 show that AD was the sixth most common cause of death in the United States [26,27]. The exact cause of Alzheimer’s disease is still unclear. It is seemingly a multifactorial disease, which is also caused by stress, unfavorable environment, eating habits, family predisposition, etc. Several hypotheses are known, the most elaborate of which concern amyloid, tau protein and acetylcholine concentration. This cholinergic hypothesis is the oldest and has attracted the most attention [26,27,28]. Drugs used in clinical practice to alleviate AD modulate acetylcholine levels in the brain by inhibiting AChE [28,29,30,31,32,33]. In the early stages of AD, AChE level increases much faster than the level of BChE. On the other hand, as AD progresses, AChE level decreases in the brain, but BChE level remains unchanged or even increased (e.g., in the hippocampus and temporal cortex). Moreover, in the later stages of AD, BChE replaces the function of AChE (i.e., hydrolysis of ACh) [34,35]. Thus, inhibition of BChE in addition to AChE may provide therapeutic benefit not only in AD. In addition, selective BChE inhibitors do not exhibit the adverse cholinergic effects that are characteristic of AChE inhibitors. Although there are several clinically used drugs, in terms of treatment quality, it is advisable to look for new AChE/BChE inhibitors with high activity, low side effects and low toxicity [28,29,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
In the last few years, cinnamic acid derivatives have been studied for their anti-invasive and anti-inflammatory activity [43,44,45,46,47]. However, a series of TMCA esters were prepared in this study and their anticholinesterase activity was investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Methods

All reagents were purchased from Merck (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and Alfa (Alfa-Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA). The melting points were determined on a Stuart SMP10 apparatus (Stone, UK) and are uncorrected. Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS5 IR spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL, USA). The spectra were obtained by the accumulation of 256 scans with 2 cm−1 resolution in the region of 4000–450 cm−1. All 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-ECA 600II device (600 MHz for 1H and 150 MHz for 13C, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6). 1H and 13C chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm. High-resolution mass spectra were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatograph, Dionex UltiMate® 3000 (Thermo Scientific, West Palm Beach, FL, USA), coupled with an LTQ Orbitrap XL TM Hybrid Ion Trap-Orbitrap Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a HESI II (heated electrospray ionization) source in the positive mode.

2.2. Synthesis

General Procedure Used to Synthesize Esters 1–12

Trimethoxycinnamic acid (0.5 g, 0.2 mmol) was suspended in dry toluene (5 mL) at room temperature and thionyl chloride (0.25 mmol) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h under reflux. The residue was used directly in the next step. Into the solution of trimethoxycinnamic acid chloride in dry toluene (5 mL), triethylamine (0.25 mmol) and corresponding substituted alcohol (0.2 mmol) were added dropwise. The mixture was stirred under reflux for 1 h, after which the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was extracted with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were washed with 1M HCl and distilled water and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The crude product was recrystallized from EtOH.
Phenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (1) [14]. Yield 56%; Mp 105–107 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3041, 3012, 2939, 2835, 1721, 1631, 1580, 1507, 1495, 1485, 1468, 1455, 1437, 1416, 1337, 1321, 1266, 1241, 1180, 1156, 1122, 1067, 1023, 999, 971, 931, 903, 868, 846, 833, 816, 785, 755, 724, 687, 940, 603, 553; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.82 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.47-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.18 (s, 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.72 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.1, 153.1, 150.5, 146.7, 139.8, 129.5, 129.5, 125.8, 121.8, 116.4, 106.3, 60.1, 56.1; HR-MS: C18H19O5 [M + H]+ calculated 315.1227 m/z, found 315.1228 m/z.
4-Methoxyphenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (2). Yield 75%; Mp 131–133 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1) 3000, 2967, 2945, 2842, 1703, 1627, 1582, 1502, 1453, 1419, 1339, 1321, 1277, 1246, 1186, 1155, 1121, 1099, 1020, 1008, 992, 941, 925, 915, 883, 863, 840, 832, 818, 805, 792, 779, 701, 658, 640, 629, 607, 544, 521, 487, 447; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.78 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 7.14–7.11 (m, 2H), 6.99–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 6H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.71 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.4, 156.8, 153.1, 146.4, 143.9, 139.,7, 129.5, 122.6, 116.5, 114.4, 106.2, 60.1, 56.1, 55.4; HR-MS: C19H21O6 [M + H]+ calculated 345.1333 m/z, found 345.1332 m/z.
4-Methylphenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (3). Yield 51%; Mp 103–105 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 2937, 2837, 1719, 1642, 1581, 1506, 1469, 1454, 1437, 1416, 1382, 1337, 1321, 1273, 1241, 1187, 1166, 1156, 1124, 1021, 998, 972, 939, 925, 917, 861, 829, 817, 808, 788, 774, 706, 632, 603, 528, 517, 501; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.79 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 7.09–7.06 (m, 2H), 6.90 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 3.32 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.2, 153.1, 148.3, 146.5, 139.8, 134.9, 129.9, 129.5, 121.5, 116.5, 106.3, 60.1, 56.1, 20.4; HR-MS: C19H21O5 [M + H]+ calculated 329.1384 m/z, found 329.1380 m/z.
4-Fluorophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (4). Yield 52%; Mp 117–119 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3068, 3008, 2971, 2944, 2846, 1727, 1711, 1635, 1581, 1501, 1471, 1448, 1419, 1338, 1322, 1274, 1237, 1224, 1183, 1149, 1120, 1092, 1042, 1012, 999, 986, 943, 926, 848, 834, 824, 797, 785, 761, 746, 707, 657, 635, 520, 604, 529, 519, 458; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.80 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 4H) 7.18 (s, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.1, 159.6 (d, J = 241.3 Hz), 153.1, 146.9, 146.6 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 139.9, 129.4, 123.6 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 116.1 (d, J = 4.3 Hz), 116.0, 106.3, 60.1, 56.1; HR-MS: C18H18FO5 [M + H]+ calculated 333.1133 m/z, found 333.1133 m/z.
4-Bromophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (5). Yield 45%; Mp 112–114 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1) 3090, 3063, 3005, 2970, 2944, 2837, 1710, 1629, 1581, 1505, 1483, 1462, 1451, 1433, 1419, 1340, 1322, 1271, 1245, 1188, 1155, 1123, 1065, 1042, 1009, 999, 985, 945, 924, 916, 876, 858, 846, 839, 827, 821, 802, 782, 765, 751, 715, 673, 656, 644, 628, 601, 584, 523, 499; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.81 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 2H), 7.18 (s, 2H), 6.91 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 164.8, 153.1, 149.8, 147.1, 139.9, 132.4, 129.4, 124.2, 118.1, 116.1, 106.3, 60.1, 56.1; HR-MS: C18H18BrO5 [M + H]+ calculated 393.0332 m/z, found 393.0323 m/z.
2-Fluorophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (6). Yield 60%; Mp 165–167 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3044, 3010, 2963, 2942, 2837, 1717, 1628, 1580, 1508, 1498, 1466, 1454, 1437, 1419, 1337, 1322, 1273, 1244, 1225, 1190, 1176, 1168, 1156, 1122, 1097, 1030, 998, 975, 951, 925, 916, 873, 849, 834, 827, 800, 785, 756, 226, 702, 640, 604, 574, 552, 543, 528, 491, 469; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.85 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.28 (td, J = 7.6 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (s, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.72 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 164.4, 153.9 (d, J = 245.7 Hz), 153.4, 147.9, 140.2, 137.9 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 129.5, 127.8 (d, J = 7.2 Hz), 125.4 (d, J = 4.3 Hz), 124.5, 116.9 (d, J = 18.8 Hz), 115.5, 106.6, 60.4, 56.32; HR-MS: C18H18FO5 [M + H]+ calculated 333.1133 m/z, found 333.1129 m/z.
2-Chlorophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (7). Yield 59%; Mp 104–107 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 2999, 2965, 2942, 2837, 1720, 1630, 1578, 1506, 1476, 1466, 1449, 1437, 1415, 1335, 1319, 1298, 1273, 1240, 1198, 1187, 1148, 1123, 1055, 1029, 996, 971, 951, 923, 914, 872, 841, 829, 816, 787, 762, 750, 739, 715, 683, 661, 637, 602, 563, 527, 796, 450; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.86 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (td, J = 7.6 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (td, J = 7.6 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (s, 2H), 6.99 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.82 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 164.2, 153.1, 147.6, 146.7, 140.0, 130.1, 129.3, 128.5, 127.6, 126.0, 124.4, 115.5, 106.5, 60.1, 56.1; HR-MS: C18H18ClO5 [M + H]+ calculated 349.0837 m/z, found 349.0837 m/z.
2,6-Dimethoxyphenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (8). Yield 69%; Mp 155–157 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3008, 2942, 2838, 1720, 1631, 1606, 1582, 1505, 1495, 1480, 1454, 1444, 1432, 1418, 1340, 1299, 1272, 1258, 1244, 1193, 1174, 1138, 1108, 1028, 1004, 982, 927, 866, 842, 822, 812, 773, 755, 714, 637, 629, 602, 554, 525, 507, 459; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.75 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (s, 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.76 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 164.1, 153.1, 152.1, 146.5, 139.7, 129.5, 128.0, 126.3, 116.3, 106.3, 105.0, 60.1, 56.1, 55.9; HR-MS: C20H23O7 [M + H]+ calculated 375.1438 m/z, found 375.1433 m/z.
5-Methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)phenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (9) [48]. Yield 74%; Mp 103–105 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 2973, 2936, 2838, 1724, 1638, 1580, 1502, 1461, 1432, 1414, 1341, 1308, 1271, 1241, 1153, 1119, 1089, 1060, 934, 980, 922, 872, 828, 820, 785, 755, 740, 667, 654, 609, 586, 575, 545, 527, 517, 495; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.80 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (s, 2H), 7.07 (dd, J = 8.2 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 2.96 (spt, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.14 (d, J = 1.14 Hz, 6H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.4, 153.1, 147.7, 146.7, 139.8, 136.8, 136.2, 129.4, 126.9, 126.4, 122.8, 116.3, 106.3, 60.1, 56.1, 26.6, 22.9, 20.3; HR-MS: C22H27O5 [M + H]+ calculated 371.1853 m/z, found 371.1850 m/z.
4-(2,2,4,4-Butyl)phenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (10). Yield 70%; Mp 150–152 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 2983, 2957, 2905, 2839, 2824, 1716, 1632, 1584, 1504, 1455, 14419, 1395, 1365, 1341, 1326, 1272, 1240, 1200, 1166, 1157, 1123, 1093, 1018, 1009, 990, 948, 931, 918, 879, 863, 840, 824, 808, 788, 760, 722, 684, 650, 638, 624, 605, 580, 534, 524, 437; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.79 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.17 (s, 2H), 7.11–7.09 (m, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 6H), 3.71 (s, 3H), 1.73 (s, 2H), 1.34 (s, 6H), 0.70 (s, 9H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 165.1, 153.1, 148.1, 147.0, 146.5, 139.8, 129.5, 127.0, 120.8, 116.6, 106.3, 60.1, 56.3, 56.1, 38.1, 32.1, 31.6, 31.4; HR-MS: C26H35O5 [M + H]+ calculated 427.2479 m/z, found 427.2469 m/z.
Benzyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (11) [14]. Yield 48%; Mp 92–95 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 2994, 2960, 2941, 2841, 1701, 1636, 1582, 1503, 1472, 1455, 1430, 1418, 1344, 1322, 1308, 1273, 1246, 1194, 1185, 1166, 1149, 1123, 1043, 1001, 976, 917, 844, 827, 787, 764, 758, 731, 702, 670, 622, 613, 595, 582, 537, 526, 510, 472. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.63 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.39 (m, 4H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.09 (s, 2H), 6.73 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 5.22 (s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 6H), 3.68 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 166.2, 153.1, 145.1, 139.5, 136.2, 129.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 117.1, 106.0, 65.6, 60.1, 56.0; HR-MS: C19H21O5 [M + H]+ calculated 329.1384 m/z, found 329.1383 m/z.
2-Propoxyethyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (12). Yield 48%; Mp 67–69 °C; IR (ATR, cm−1): 3003, 2952, 2870, 2843, 1701, 1639, 1583, 1506, 1464, 1450, 1417, 1389, 1346, 1318, 1306, 1272, 1246, 1176, 1152, 1124, 1100, 1064, 1049, 1024, 996, 980, 901, 887, 847, 817, 791, 766, 671, 621, 611, 593, 567, 527, 497; 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6), δ: 7.60 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (s, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 4.26 (m, 2H), 3.82 (s, 6H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 3.63–3.61 (m, 2H), 3.38 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.51 (sxt, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 0.86 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6) δ: 166.8, 153.3, 145.2, 139.7, 129.9, 117.5, 106.1, 72.1, 68.2, 63.6, 60.4, 56.3, 22.6, 10.7; HR-MS: C17H25O6 [M + H]+ calculated 325.1646 m/z, found 325.1639 m/z.

2.3. Evaluating In Vitro AChE and BChE-Inhibition Potencies

The ability of all the prepared compounds to inhibit AChE from electric eel (Electrophorus electricus) and BChE from equine serum (both purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was determined in vitro using a modified Ellman’s method, as described previously [49,50,51,52,53].

2.4. Measurement of Inhibition Type

Compound 7 was used for the determination of the type of inhibition. The measuring procedure was analogue to the determination of IC50. For the measurement, the following concentrations of the substrate were used: 20, 40, 60 and 80 μM. Methodology was performed as the method described previously [54,55].

2.5. In Vitro Viability Assay

The safety of the investigated compounds (effect on cell viability) was evaluated on two different cell lines: the adherent human synovial cell line SW982 (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and suspension human genetically modified leukemia cell line THP1-Blue™ NF-κB (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA). Screening was performed as described previously [44,45].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry and Physicochemical Properties

All the investigated compounds 1–12 were synthesized according to Scheme 1. The carboxyl group of the starting TMCA was converted with thionyl chloride to the acyl chloride, which, upon subsequent reaction with the appropriate alcohol/phenol, yielded the targeted ester. Both reactions (conversion to the acid chloride and subsequent ester formation) were performed in dry toluene under reflux. All the compounds were recrystallized from ethanol.
Lipophilicity (expressed as log P values) of compounds 1–12, electronic σ parameters of individual ester substituents (–R) and molar volumes (MV (cm3)) of individual ester substituents (–R) were used as physicochemical descriptors characterizing individual investigated compounds. The program ACD/Percepta ver. 2012 was used for all predicted values (see Table 1). As expected, TMCA showed the lowest log P. Of the target esters, aliphatic derivative 12 (R = 2-propoxyethyl (PPXE), log P = 2.48) and compound 8 (R = 2,6-OCH3-Ph, log P = 2.90) were the least lipophilic compounds. Compound 10 (R = 4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenyl (TMPP), log P = 6.43) showed the highest predicted lipophilicity. The fact that methoxyphenyl or benzyl substituents have lower lipophilicity than their “parent” phenyl substituent was described, for example, in [56,57,58,59,60,61]. The lowest electronic σ parameters for individual ester substituents were predicted for compound 8 (σ = 0.09); the highest electron-withdrawing effect was observed for compounds substituted in the ortho position of the phenyl ring by fluorine (6, σ = 1.02) and chlorine (7, σ = 1.05). Thus, it can be stated that most ester substituents possess electron-withdrawing properties in the range from approx. 0.2 to 1.05. The bulkiness of the individual ester substituents, expressed as molar volume, was logically the smallest for the unsubstituted phenyl ester 1 (MV = 80.88 cm3); on the contrary, compound 10 (R = TMPP) has by far the largest volume MV = 213.31 cm3 within the whole series. In addition, compound 9 (R = 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenyl (IPMP)) has the second largest volume within the investigated series of esters, with an MV value of 146.96 cm3.

3.2. In Vitro Evaluation of AChE- and BChE-Inhibiting Activity

All the esters were evaluated for their ability to inhibit AChE and BChE. This activity was compared with parent TMCA and the clinically used drugs rivastigmine (RIV) and galantamine (GLT). RIV (Figure 1) is a carbamate derivative structurally derived from physostigmine. The exact mechanism of RIV has not been fully established, but RIV is thought to be a classical acylation pseudo-reversible carbamate cholinesterase inhibitor that inhibits both AChE and BChE, thereby preventing hydrolysis of acetylcholine, leading to increased acetylcholine concentrations at cholinergic synapses. The anticholinesterase activity of rivastigmine is relatively specific for brain AChE and BChE compared to activities in peripheral tissues [62]. GAL (Figure 1) is a tertiary alkaloid extracted from Galanthus nivalis (Amaryllidaceae). It is a centrally and peripherally acting non-acylated competitive reversible inhibitor of muscle and brain AChE, thereby increasing cholinergic tone. In addition, it also acts as a positive allosteric modulator of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, which may also contribute to ameliorating AD symptoms [63]. This activity was expressed as IC50 (μM) (concentration of inhibitor that was required for 50% inhibition of the enzymes).
Based on the results summarized in Table 1, it can be stated that cholinesterase’s inhibitory activity is moderate, but several of the most active compounds showed comparable inhibition of AChE with RIV. Compounds 5 (R = 4-Br-Ph), 7 (R = 2-Cl-Ph) and 9 (R = IPMP) showed IC50 ca. 46 µM and compound 11 (R = Bn) had IC50 = 49.44 µM. On the other hand, only two compounds demonstrated more significant BChE inhibition: ester 7 (R = 2-Cl-Ph, IC50 = 32.46 µM) and 6 (R = 2-F-Ph, IC50 = 44.41 µM). Moreover, it should be noted that the selectivity indices (increased BChE inhibition in comparison with AChE inhibition) for these two compounds are 1.42 and 1.71, respectively, which makes these two compounds valuable, as mentioned above.
The dependences of the AChE inhibition of the compounds expressed as log(1/IC50 (M)) on lipophilicity; expressed as log P, electronic σ parameters and bulkiness of the individual ester substituents; and expressed as MV are illustrated in Figure 2A–C. While it is evident that the effect of σ parameters on AChE inhibition is negligible (see Figure 2B), it can be seen that lipophilicity in the log P 4–5 range is advantageous for higher activity (Figure 2A), similar to the bulkiness of ester substituents in the MV range from 94 to 146 cm3 (Figure 2C).
The dependences of the BChE inhibition of the investigated compounds expressed as log(1/IC50 (M)) on lipophilicity expressed as log P, electronic σ parameters and bulkiness of the individual ester substituents are illustrated in Figure 3A–C. In contrast to AChE inhibition, a bilinear dependence of BChE inhibition on log P values can be observed in Figure 3A, with a maximum ca. log P = 3.7. From the dependence shown in Figure 3B, a linear dependence is clearly seen, where the activity increases with the electron-withdrawing properties of the ester substituents. The bilinear trend (increasing BChE inhibition to MV = 92 cm3 (7, R = 2-Cl-Ph) followed by decreasing activity with increasing ester bulkiness) can also be traced to Figure 3C.
It is important to specify that while for AChE inhibition, the position of the substituent on the phenyl ring does not appear to be absolutely crucial (para substituted isomers have only slightly better activity; compare para vs. ortho position of the substituents of compounds 5 and 7 or 4 and 6), for BChE inhibition, it is absolutely the fundamental position of the substituent in the ortho position. The same observations were found recently, e.g., in [53,56,64,65,66,67,68].

Type of Inhibition

The reversible inhibitors are usually divided into four groups: competitive, non-competitive, uncompetitive and mixed. The mechanism of action of the inhibitor can be determined using the Lineweaver–Burk (L–B) plot and comparing the kinetic parameters—Michaelis constant (KM) and maximum velocity (Vm) of the uninhibited and inhibited reaction. The competitive inhibitor increases KM by interfering with the active site of the enzyme but does not affect Vm. All lines in the L–B plot intersect at the same point on the y-axis. The non-competitive inhibitor does not change KM but decreases Vm. All lines in the L–B plot intersect at the same point on the x-axis. The uncompetitive inhibitor decreases KM and Vm, but their ratio is the same as for the uninhibited reaction. All lines in the L–B plot are parallel. The inhibitor acting via the mixed type of inhibition changes KM, Vm and their ratio compared to the reaction in the absence of the inhibitor. All lines in the L–B plot intersect in quadrant II or III [54].
L–B plots for the most effective compound 7. inhibiting AChE and BChE, are depicted on Figure 4A and Figure 5A. Based on the L–B plots, ester 7 acts via the mixed type of inhibition. Moreover, the inhibition constant Ki (i.e., dissociation constant of complex enzyme-inhibitor) was calculated using the regression equation of the dependence of the slope (L–B plot) vs. the concentration of the inhibitor (Figure 4B and Figure 5B).

3.3. In Vitro Cell Viability

To exclude the potential cytotoxic effect of the tested compounds, their influence on cell viability was evaluated on two different cell lines—adherent human synovial cell line SW982 and suspension human genetically modified leukemia cell line THP1-Blue™ NF-κB. All of the used compounds slightly reduced cell viability (measured as mitochondrial metabolism) at the highest concentration of 30 µM after 24 and 72 h. However, the observed relative cell viability was >70% for both cell lines and all compounds. Moreover, the most active AChE and BChE inhibitors 6, 7, 9, and 11 did not decrease the relative viability of THP1-Blue™ NF-κB cells under 50% after 24 h incubation, when they were used at the concentration of 60 µM. The compound 5 with the most “cytotoxic” behavior had an IC50 value for THP1-Blue™ NF-κB of ~54 µM after 24 h incubation.

4. Conclusions

A series of twelve trimethoxycinnamic acid esters was prepared and characterized. The starting trimethoxycinnamic acid and all prepared esters were tested for their ability to inhibit in vitro AChE and BChE. 2-Chlorophenyl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)- prop-2-enoate (7) showed the highest activity against both AChE (IC50 = 46.18 μM) and BChE (IC50 = 32.46 μM). However, (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate (6) had the best BChE selectivity index (SI = 1.71). Based on the Lineweaver–Burk plot for compound 7, it was determined that it acts via a mixed type of inhibition for both enzymes. The position of the substituent on the phenyl ring does not appear to be essential for AChE inhibition, nor have significant effects for the lipophilicity, bulkiness or electronic parameters of the substituents on AChE activity been found. On the other hand, for BChE-inhibiting activity, the absolutely essential position of the substituent is in the ortho position. Additionally, for BChE inhibition, an increase in activity can be observed with an increasing electron-withdrawing effect of the substituent, which, at the same time, has lipophilicity expressed as log P ca. 3.7 and rather less bulkiness (ca. MV = 92 cm3). All studied compounds were evaluated for their in vitro cytotoxicity on two human cell lines and the active compounds were found to be insignificantly cytotoxic, underlining the importance of studying these small molecules in the future.

Author Contributions

J.K. and T.S. synthesized and characterized the compounds. M.O. performed analytical measurement. S.S., K.S., A.I. and J.H. performed biological screening. J.K. and J.J. designed the compounds. J.K., S.S., J.H. and J.J. wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (project APVV-18-0302). T.S. was supported by Palacky University in Olomouc (IGA_PrF_2021_032). The HPLC/HRMS system forms a part of the National Infrastructure CzeCOS ProCES CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001609; M.O. was supported by SustES (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797). The work of J.H. was also supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the project “FIT” CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000495, and Czech Ministry of Agriculture grant no. RO0518. The authors wish to acknowledge financial support from the University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kralova, K.; Jampilek, J. Responses of Medicinal and aromatic plants to engineered nanoparticles. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jampilek, J. Recent advances in design of potential quinoxaline anti-infectives. Curr. Med. Chem. 2014, 21, 4347–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jampilek, J. Design of antimalarial agents based on natural products. Curr. Org. Chem. 2017, 21, 1824–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dolab, J.G.; Lima, B.; Spaczynska, E.; Kos, J.; Cano, N.H.; Feresin, G.; Tapia, A.; Garibotto, F.; Petenatti, E.; Olivella, M.; et al. Antimicrobial activity of Annona emarginata (Schltdl.) H. Rainer and most active isolated compound against clinically important bacteria. Molecules 2018, 23, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jampilek, J. Design and discovery of new antibacterial agents: Advances, perspectives, challenges. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 4972–5006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shuab, R.; Lone, R.; Koul, K.K. Cinnamate and cinnamate derivatives in plants. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruwizhi, N.; Aderibigbe, B.A. Cinnamic acid derivatives and their biological efficacy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. 3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic Acid. EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/searchId.do?chebiId=CHEBI:566519 (accessed on 19 March 2021).
  10. Klein, L.C.; de Andrade, S.F.; Filho, V.C. A pharmacognostic approach to the Polygala genus: Phytochemical and pharmacological aspects. Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 181–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. May, B.H.; Lu, C.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, A.L.; Xue, C.C. Chinese herbs for memory disorders: A review and systematic analysis of classical herbal literature. J. Acupunct. Meridian Stud. 2013, 6, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jung, J.C.; Min, D.; Kim, H.; Jang, S.; Lee, Y.; Park, W.K.; Khan, I.A.; Moon, H.I.; Jung, M.; Oh, S. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl acrylamides as antinarcotic agents. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2010, 25, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, C.Y.; Wei, X.D.; Chen, C.R. 3,4,5-Trimethoxycinnamic acid, one of the constituents of Polygalae radix exerts anti-seizure effects by modulating GABAAergic systems in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 131, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jung, J.C.; Moon, S.; Min, D.; Park, W.K.; Jung, M.; Oh, S. Synthesis and evaluation of a series of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid derivatives as potential antinarcotic agents. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2013, 81, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Leslie, B.J.; Holaday, C.R.; Nguyen, T.; Hergenrother, P.J. Phenylcinnamides as novel antimitotic agents. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3964–3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kamal, A.; Bajee, S.; Nayak, V.L.; Rao, A.V.S.; Nagaraju, B.; Reddy, C.R.; Sopanrao, K.J.; Alarifi, A. Synthesis and biological evaluation of arylcinnamide linked combretastatin-A4 hybrids as tubulin polymerization inhibitors and apoptosis inducing agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 2957–2964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wong, I.L.K.; Wang, B.C.; Yuan, J.; Duan, L.X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, T.; Li, X.M.; Hu, X.; Zhang, X.Y.; Jiang, T. Potent and nontoxic chemosensitizer of P-glycoprotein mediated multidrug resistance in cancer: Synthesis and evaluation of methylated epigallocatechin, gallocatechin, and dihydromyricetin derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 529–4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, C.C.; Deng, T.; Fan, M.L.; Lv, W.B.; Liu, J.H.; Yu, B.Y. Synthesis and in vitro antitumor evaluation of dihydroartemisinin-cinnamic acid ester derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 107, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, L.J.; Geng, C.A.; Ma, Y.B.; Luo, J.; Huang, X.Y.; Chen, H.; Zhou, N.J.; Zhang, X.M.; Chen, J.J. Design, synthesis, and molecular hybrids of caudatin and cinnamic acids as novel anti-hepatitis B virus agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 352–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Qurat-Ul-Ain, S.; Wang, W.; Yang, M.; Du, N.; Wan, S.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, T. Anomeric selectivity and influenza A virus inhibition study on methoxylated analogues of pentagalloylglucose. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 402, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Z.; Song, H.; Xie, J.; Liu, T.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; He, X.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, X. Research progress in the biological activities of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid (TMCA) derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 173, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, S.; Singh, B.K.; Arya, P.; Malhotra, S.; Thimmulappa, R.; Prasad, A.K.; Van der Eycken, E.; Olsen, C.E.; Depass, A.L.; Biswal, S. Novel natural product-based cinnamates and their thio and thiono analogs as potent inhibitors of cell adhesion molecules on human endothelial cells. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 5498–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, C.; Du, Q.Y.; Chen, L.D.; Wu, W.H.; Liao, S.Y.; Yu, L.H.; Liang, X.T. Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel tacrine-multialkoxybenzene hybrids as multi-targeted compounds against Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 116, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, S.; Zhang, B.; Meng, X.; Yao, J.; Fang, J. Synthesis of piperlongumine analogues and discovery of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activators as potential neuroprotective agents. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 5242–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhao, Z.; Bai, Y.; Xie, J.; Chen, X.; He, X.; Sun, Y.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Zheng, X. Excavating precursors from the traditional Chinese herb Polygala tenuifolia and Gastrodia elata: Synthesis, anticonvulsant activity evaluation of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid (TMCA) ester derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 88, 102832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Dementia Statistics. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London, UK. Available online: https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/ (accessed on 19 March 2021).
  27. Gaugler, J.; James, B.; Johnson, T.; Marin, A.; Weuve, J. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020, 16, 391–460. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lane, R.M.; Potkin, S.G.; Enz, A. Targeting acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase in dementia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006, 9, 101–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Darvesh, S. Butyrylcholinesterase as a diagnostic and therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016, 13, 1173–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schwarz, S.; Lucas, S.D.; Sommerwerk, S.; Csuk, R. Amino derivatives of glycyrrhetinic acid as potential inhibitors of cholinesterases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 52, 3370–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ibach, B.; Haen, E. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 10, 231–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Colovic, M.B.; Krstic, D.Z.; Lazarevic-Pasti, T.D.; Bondzic, A.M.; Vasic, V.M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: Pharmacology and toxicology. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2013, 11, 315–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Moss, D.E. Improving anti-neurodegenerative benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer’s disease: Are irreversible inhibitors the future? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Darvesh, S.; Hopkins, D.A.; Geula, C. Neurobiology of butyrylcholinesterase. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003, 4, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mesulam, M.; Guillozet, A.; Shaw, P.; Quinn, B. Widely spread butyrylcholinesterase can hydrolyze acetylcholine in the normal and Alzheimer brain. Neurobiol. Dis. 2002, 9, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Giacobini, E. Cholinesterase inhibitors: New roles and therapeutic alternatives. Pharmacol. Res. 2004, 50, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cherif, O.; Allouche, F.; Chabchoub, F.; Chioua, M.; Soriano, E.; Yanez, M.; Cacabelos, R.; Romero, A.; Lopez, M.G.; Contelles, J.M. Isoxazolotacrines as nontoxic and selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Future Med. Chem. 2014, 6, 1883–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Brus, B.; Kosak, U.; Turk, S.; Pislar, A.; Coquelle, N.; Kos, J.; Stojan, J.; Colletier, J.P.; Gobec, S. Discovery, biological evaluation, and crystal structure of a novel nanomolar selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 8167–8179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zeb, A.; Hameed, A.; Khan, L.; Khan, I.; Dalvandi, K.; Choudhary, M.I.; Basha, F.Z. Quinoxaline derivatives: Novel and selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors. Med. Chem. 2014, 10, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nordberg, A.; Ballard, C.; Bullock, R.; Darreh-Shori, T.; Somogyi, M. A review of butyrylcholinesterase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Prim. Care Companion CNS Disord. 2013, 15, PCC.12r01412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kandiah, N.; Pai, M.C.; Senanarong, V.; Looi, I.; Ampil, E.; Park, K.W.; Karanam, A.K.; Christopher, S. Rivastigmine: The advantages of dual inhibition of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase and its role in subcortical vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017, 12, 697–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dighe, S.N.; Tippana, M.; van Akker, S.; Collet, T.A. Structure-based scaffold repurposing toward the discovery of novel cholinesterase inhibitors. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 30971–30979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pospisilova, S.; Kos, J.; Michnova, H.; Kapustikova, I.; Strharsky, T.; Oravec, M.; Moricz, A.M.; Bakonyi, J.; Kauerova, T.; Kollar, P.; et al. Synthesis and spectrum of biological activities of novel N-arylcinnamamides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Hosek, J.; Kos, J.; Strharsky, T.; Cerna, L.; Starha, P.; Vanco, J.; Travnicek, Z.; Devinsky, F.; Jampilek, J. Investigation of anti-inflammatory potential of n-arylcinnamamide derivatives. Molecules 2019, 24, 4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kos, J.; Bak, A.; Kozik, V.; Jankech, T.; Strharsky, T.; Swietlicka, A.; Michnova, H.; Hosek, J.; Smolinski, A.; Oravec, M.; et al. Biological activities and ADMET-related properties of novel set of cinnamanilides. Molecules 2020, 25, 4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Michnova, H.; Strharsky, T.; Kos, J.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. Antistaphylococcal activity of polychlorinated N-arylcinnamamides. In Proceedings of the 6th International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry (ECMC-6), Online, 1–30 November 2020; p. 7403. Available online: https://sciforum.net/manuscripts/7403/slides.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  47. Michnova, H.; Strharsky, T.; Pospisilova, S.; Kos, J.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. Anti-infective activity of selected trifluoromethyl-substituted N-Arylcinnamamides. In Proceedings of the 6th International Electronic Conference on Medicinal Chemistry (ECMC-6), Online, 1–30 November 2020; p. 7404. Available online: https://sciforum.net/manuscripts/7404/slides.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  48. Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Kong, Y.; Kim, H.; Kang, J. Synthesis and in vitro biological activity of retinyl polyhydroxybenzoates, novel hybrid retinoid derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 508–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ellman, G.L.; Courtney, K.D.; Andres, V.; Featherstone, R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961, 7, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ou, S.; Kwok, K.C.; Wang, Y.; Bao, H. An improved method to determine SH and –S–S– group content in soymilk protein. Food Chem. 2004, 88, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sinko, G.; Calic, M.; Bosak, A.; Kovarik, Z. Limitation of the Ellman method: Cholinesterase activity measurement in the presence of oximes. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 370, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zdrazilova, P.; Stepankova, S.; Komers, K.; Ventura, K.; Cegan, A. Half-inhibition concentrations of new cholinesterase inhibitors. Z. Nat. C 2004, 59, 293–296. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kos, J.; Kozik, V.; Pindjakova, D.; Jankech, T.; Smolinski, A.; Stepankova, S.; Hosek, J.; Oravec, M.; Jampilek, J.; Bak, A. Synthesis and hybrid SAR property modeling of novel cholinesterase inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lineweaver, H.; Burk, D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1934, 56, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kielczewska, U.; Jorda, R.; Gonzalez, G.; Morzycki, J.W.; Ajani, H.; Svrckova, K.; Stepankova, S.; Wojtkielewicz, A. The synthesis and cholinesterase inhibitory activities of solasodine analogues with seven-membered F ring. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 205, 105776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pejchal, V.; Stepankova, S.; Padelkova, Z.; Imramovsky, A.; Jampilek, J. 1,3-Substituted imidazolidine-2,4,5-triones: Synthesis and inhibition of cholinergic enzymes. Molecules 2011, 16, 7565–7582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pauk, K.; Zadrazilova, I.; Imramovsky, A.; Vinsova, J.; Pokorna, M.; Masarikova, M.; Cizek, A.; Jampilek, J. New derivatives of salicylamides: Preparation and antimicrobial activity against various bacterial species. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 6574–6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kos, J.; Nevin, E.; Soral, M.; Kushkevych, I.; Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Kollar, P.; Coffey, A.; O’Mahony, J.; Liptaj, T.; et al. Synthesis and antimycobacterial properties of ring-substituted 6-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 2035–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Nevin, E.; Soral, M.; Gonec, T.; Kollar, P.; Oravec, M.; Coffey, A.; O’Mahony, J.; Liptaj, T.; et al. Ring-substituted 8-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxanilides as potential antimycobacterial agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 4188–4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kapustikova, I.; Bak, A.; Gonec, T.; Kos, J.; Kozik, V.; Jampilek, J. Investigation of hydro-lipophilic properties of N-alkoxyphenylhydroxynaphthalenecarboxamides. Molecules 2018, 23, 1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kos, J.; Zadrazilova, I.; Pesko, M.; Keltosova, S.; Tengler, J.; Gonec, T.; Bobal, P.; Kauerova, T.; Oravec, M.; Kollar, P.; et al. Antibacterial and herbicidal activity of ring-substituted 3-hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxanilides. Molecules 2013, 18, 7977–7997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. DrugBank–Rivastigmine. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00989 (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  63. DrugBank–Galantamine. Available online: https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB00674 (accessed on 7 May 2021).
  64. Imramovsky, A.; Stepankova, S.; Vanco, J.; Pauk, K.; Monreal-Ferriz, J.; Vinsova, J.; Jampilek, J. Acetylcholinesterase-inhibiting activity of salicylanilide N-alkylcarbamates and their molecular docking. Molecules 2012, 17, 10142–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Imramovsky, A.; Pejchal, V.; Stepankova, S.; Vorcakova, K.; Jampilek, J.; Vanco, J.; Simunek, P.; Kralovec, K.; Bruckova, L.; Mandikova, J.; et al. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of new derivatives of 2-substituted-6-fluorobenzo[d]thiazoles as cholinesterase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 1735–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pizova, H.; Havelkova, M.; Stepankova, S.; Bak, A.; Kauerova, T.; Kozik, V.; Oravec, M.; Imramovsky, A.; Kollar, P.; Bobal, P.; et al. Prolin-based carbamates as cholinesterase inhibitors. Molecules 2017, 22, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Bak, A.; Kozik, V.; Kozakiewicz, D.; Gajcy, K.; Strub, D.J.; Swietlicka, A.; Stepankova, S.; Imramovsky, A.; Polanski, J.; Smolinski, A.; et al. Novel benzene-based carbamates for AChE/BChE inhibition: Synthesis and ligand/structure-oriented SAR study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Bak, A.; Pizova, H.; Kozik, V.; Vorcakova, K.; Kos, J.; Treml, J.; Odehnalova, K.; Oravec, M.; Imramovsky, A.; Bobal, P.; et al. SAR-mediated similarity assessment of property profile for new silicon-based AChE/BChE inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Applsci 11 04691 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aryl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoates 1–12. Reagents and conditions: a: SOCl2, dry toluene, reflux 1 h; b: Et3N, dry toluene, reflux 1 h.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of aryl (2E)-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoates 1–12. Reagents and conditions: a: SOCl2, dry toluene, reflux 1 h; b: Et3N, dry toluene, reflux 1 h.
Applsci 11 04691 sch001
Applsci 11 04691 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of approved drugs used as standards in this work.
Figure 1. Structures of approved drugs used as standards in this work.
Applsci 11 04691 g001
Applsci 11 04691 g002 550
Figure 2. Dependences of AChE-inhibiting activity log(1/IC50 (M)) of all compounds 1–13 on lipophilicity expressed as log P (A), electronic σ parameters and bulkiness expressed as molar volume (MV) of whole O-part of individual esters (B,C). IPMP = 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenyl, TMPP = 4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenyl, PPXE = 2-propoxyethyl.
Figure 2. Dependences of AChE-inhibiting activity log(1/IC50 (M)) of all compounds 1–13 on lipophilicity expressed as log P (A), electronic σ parameters and bulkiness expressed as molar volume (MV) of whole O-part of individual esters (B,C). IPMP = 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenyl, TMPP = 4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenyl, PPXE = 2-propoxyethyl.
Applsci 11 04691 g002
Applsci 11 04691 g003 550
Figure 3. Dependences of BChE-inhibiting activity log(1/IC50 (M)) of all compounds 1–13 on lipophilicity expressed as log P (A), electronic σ parameters and bulkiness expressed as molar volume (MV) of whole O-part of individual esters (B,C). IPMP = 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenyl, TMPP = 4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenyl, PPXE = 2-propoxyethyl.
Figure 3. Dependences of BChE-inhibiting activity log(1/IC50 (M)) of all compounds 1–13 on lipophilicity expressed as log P (A), electronic σ parameters and bulkiness expressed as molar volume (MV) of whole O-part of individual esters (B,C). IPMP = 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenyl, TMPP = 4-(2,4,4-trimethylpentan-2-yl)phenyl, PPXE = 2-propoxyethyl.
Applsci 11 04691 g003
Applsci 11 04691 g004 550
Figure 4. Lineweaver–Burk plot for compound 7 inhibiting AChE. The measurements were performed in duplicate and the points are expressed as average values (A). Dependence of the slope (Lineweaver–Burk plot) vs. concentration of inhibitor (combination AChE-7) (B).
Figure 4. Lineweaver–Burk plot for compound 7 inhibiting AChE. The measurements were performed in duplicate and the points are expressed as average values (A). Dependence of the slope (Lineweaver–Burk plot) vs. concentration of inhibitor (combination AChE-7) (B).
Applsci 11 04691 g004
Applsci 11 04691 g005 550
Figure 5. Lineweaver–Burk plot for compound 7 inhibiting BChE. The measurements were performed in duplicate and points are expressed as average values (A). Dependence of slope (Lineweaver–Burk plot) vs. concentration of inhibitor (combination BChE-7) (B).
Figure 5. Lineweaver–Burk plot for compound 7 inhibiting BChE. The measurements were performed in duplicate and points are expressed as average values (A). Dependence of slope (Lineweaver–Burk plot) vs. concentration of inhibitor (combination BChE-7) (B).
Applsci 11 04691 g005
Table
Table 1. Structures of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid (TMCA) and its discussed ring-substituted esters 1–12; calculated values of log P, electronic σ parameters of R substituents and molar volume (MV (cm3)) of R substituents; in vitro AChE and BChE inhibition (IC50 (μM)) compared with standards rivastigmine (RIV) and galantamine (GLT) and in vitro viability (SW982, THP1-Blue™ NF-κB) assays (IC50 (μM) after 24 h and 72 h incubation) of investigated compounds. Cholinesterase inhibition is expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments).
Table 1. Structures of 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid (TMCA) and its discussed ring-substituted esters 1–12; calculated values of log P, electronic σ parameters of R substituents and molar volume (MV (cm3)) of R substituents; in vitro AChE and BChE inhibition (IC50 (μM)) compared with standards rivastigmine (RIV) and galantamine (GLT) and in vitro viability (SW982, THP1-Blue™ NF-κB) assays (IC50 (μM) after 24 h and 72 h incubation) of investigated compounds. Cholinesterase inhibition is expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments).
Applsci 11 04691 i001
Comp.Rlog P aσ(R)aMV(R)aAChEBChESIbTox IC50 (μM)
SW982
(72 h)		THP
(72 h) (24 h)
1 Applsci 11 04691 i0023.230.6080.8855.01 ± 1.0574.74 ± 1.360.74>30>30>30
2 Applsci 11 04691 i0033.190.36103.6157.50 ± 0.02117.91 ± 2.810.49>30>30>30
3 Applsci 11 04691 i0043.490.4697.1169.57 ± 0.6581.12 ± 1.920.86>30>30>30
4 Applsci 11 04691 i0053.340.6285.9065.22 ± 3.7072.58 ± 0.270.90>30>30>30
5 Applsci 11 04691 i0063.790.7494.1446.10 ± 1.0799.25 ± 1.720.46>30>30~54
6 Applsci 11 04691 i0073.151.0285.9075.79 ± 0.3744.41 ± 1.951.71>30>30>60
7 Applsci 11 04691 i0083.721.0592.2546.18 ± 0.8132.46 ± 0.761.42>30>30>60
8 Applsci 11 04691 i0092.900.09126.1050.45 ± 0.61166.20 ± 8.150.30>30>30>30
9 Applsci 11 04691 i0104.790.60146.9646.59 ± 0.60130.92 ± 5.080.36>30>30>60
10 Applsci 11 04691 i0116.430.45213.3153.41 ± 1.86376.63 ± 32.730.14>30>30>30
11 Applsci 11 04691 i0123.170.2391.4949.44 ± 0.73118.41 ± 0.220.42>30>30>60
12 Applsci 11 04691 i0132.480.20103.18127.28 ± 0.27183.16 ± 5.260.69>30>30>30
TMCA Applsci 11 04691 i0141.61––102.13 ± 0.62325.65 ± 20.530.31––>40
RIV––––50.10 ± 3.0819.95 ± 0.312.51–––
GLT––––4.0 ± 0.137.96 ± 0.590.50–––
a calculated using ACD/Percepta 2012; b SI (index selectivity) = IC50 (AChE)/IC50 (BChE). A higher selectivity to BChE is indicated in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kos, J.; Strharsky, T.; Stepankova, S.; Svrckova, K.; Oravec, M.; Hosek, J.; Imramovsky, A.; Jampilek, J. Trimethoxycinnamates and Their Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4691. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104691

AMA Style

Kos J, Strharsky T, Stepankova S, Svrckova K, Oravec M, Hosek J, Imramovsky A, Jampilek J. Trimethoxycinnamates and Their Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(10):4691. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kos, Jiri, Tomas Strharsky, Sarka Stepankova, Katarina Svrckova, Michal Oravec, Jan Hosek, Ales Imramovsky, and Josef Jampilek. 2021. "Trimethoxycinnamates and Their Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activity" Applied Sciences 11, no. 10: 4691. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11104691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop