Abstract
We prove new theorems related to the construction of the shallow water bi-Hamiltonian systems associated to the semi-direct product of Virasoro and affine Kac–Moody Lie algebras. We discuss associated Verma modules, coadjoint orbits, Casimir functions, and bi-Hamiltonian systems.
1 Introduction: The semi-direct product of Virasoro algebra with the Kac–Moody algebra
This paper is a continuation of the paper [1] where we studied bi-Hamiltonian systems associated to the three-cocycle extension of the algebra of diffeomorphisms on a circle. In this note we show that certain natural problems (classification of Verma modules, classification of coadjoint orbits, determination of Casimir functions) [2, 3, 4, 5] for the central extensions of the Lie algebra Vect(S1) ⋉ 𝓛𝓖 reduce to the equivalent problems for Virasoro and affine Kac–Moody algebras (which are central extensions of Vect(S1) and 𝓛𝓖 respectively). Let G be a Lie group and 𝓖 its Lie algebra. The group Diff(S1) of diffeomorphisms of the circle is included in the group of automorphisms of the Loop group LG of smooth maps from S1 to G. For any pairs (ϕ, ψ) ϵ Diff(S1)2 and (g, h) ϵ LG2 the composition law of the group Diff(S1) ⋉ 𝓛𝓖 is
The Lie algebra of Diff(S1) ⋉ LG is the semi-direct product Vect(S1) ⋉ 𝓛𝓖 of the Lie algebras Vect(S1) and 𝓛𝓖.
Let 𝓖 be a Lie algebra and 〈., .〉 a non-degenerated invariant bilinear form. Vect(S1) is the Lie algebra of vector fields on the circle and 𝓛𝓖 the loop algebra (i.e., the Lie algebra of smooth maps from S1 to 𝓖), Vect(S1)ℂ is the Lie algebra over ℂ generated by the elements Ln, n ϵ ℤ with the relations
We denote by 𝓛𝓖ℂ the Lie algebra over ℂ generated by the elements gn, n ϵ ℤ, g ϵ 𝓖 where (λg + μh)n is identified with λ gn + μhn with the relations
The semi-direct product of Vect(S1) with 𝓛𝓖 is as a vector space isomorphic to C∞ (S1, ℝ) ⊕ C∞(S1,𝓖) [6]. The Lie bracket of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) has the form
for any (u, v) ϵ C∞(S1,ℝ)2 and any (a, b) ϵ C∞(S1,𝓖)2, where prime denote derivative with respect to a coordinate on S1. The Lie algebra Vect(S1) ⋉ 𝓛𝓖 can be extended with a universal central extension 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) by a two-dimensional vector space. Let us denote by 𝓙(u) = ∫S1u. Two independent cocycles are given by
We denote by (u,a, χ, α) the elements of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) with u ϵ C∞(S1, ℝ), a ϵ C∞(S1, 𝓖) and (χ, α) ϵ ℝ2. The algebra 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) can be also represented as the semi-direct product of Virasoro algebra on the affine Kac–Moody algebra. We denote by cVir and cK−M the elements (0, 0, 1, 0) and (0, 0, 0, 1) respectively. If 𝓖 = ℝ, then the Lie algebra Vect(S1) ⋉ 𝓛ℝ has a universal central extension
We denote by (u, a, χ, α, γ, δ) elements of
In this paper we discuss a few questions. Let us mention the main results. First, in Section 2 we consider Kirillov-Kostant Poisson brackets [7] of the regular dual of the semi-direct product of Virasoro Lie algebra with the Affine Kac–Moody Lie algebra. Let us denote by 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)′ the subset of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) of elements (u, a, ξ, β) with non-vanishing β. We denote by (
In subsection 5.2 the case of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) is considered. In subsection 5.3 we discuss representations of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖). We prove that positive energy representation V of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) with non-vanishing βId-action of the cocyle cK−M delivers a pair of commuting representations of Virasoro and affine Kac–Moody Lie algebras. This proposition determines whether a 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) Verma module is a sub-module of another Verma module of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖). We also prove a proposition regarding a linear form over 𝔥 with non-vanishing λ (cK−M). In this paper we present proofs for corresponding theorems and lemmas.
2 The Kirillov-Kostant structure of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)
Now we consider Kirillov-Kostant Poisson brackets of the regular dual of the semi-direct product of Virasoro Lie algebra with the Affine Kac–Moody Lie algebra. Let 𝓚 be a Lie algebra with a non-degenerated bilinear form 〈., .〉. A function f : 𝓚 → ℝ is called regular at x ϵ 𝓚 if there exists an element ∇ f (x) such that
for any a ϵ 𝓚. For two regular functions f,g : 𝓚 ⟶ ℝ, we define the Kirillov-Kostant structure as a Poisson structure on 𝓚 with
Then for any e ϵ 𝓖, the second Poisson structure {f, g}e(x) compatible with the Kirillov-Kostant Poisson structure is defined by
A non-degenerated bilinear form on 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) and
We denote by 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)′ the subset of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) of elements (u, a, ξ, β) with non-vanishing β. Let
Theorem 2.1
𝓘 and 𝓘̃ are Poisson maps.
Proof
For any regular function f(u, a, ξ, β) from
and for the bracket
Then the map π1 from 𝓢𝓤(𝓖) onto
Indeed, for i = 1, 2,
This gives
and
Let gi(a, β), i = 1, 2 be two regular functions on the affine Kac–Moody algebra. One notes that δg1,u = δg2,u = 0. Therefore,
Then,
We have:
The sum of the first two terms is equal to 0. The last term is 𝓙(δfu〈[a, a], δga〉), and is equal to zero. One can proceed similarly for 𝓘̃. □
3 Coadjoint orbits Casimir functions and for 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)
Let 𝓗̃ be a central extension of a Lie algebra 𝓗, and H be a Lie group with Lie algebra is 𝓗. ThenH acts on𝓗̃* by the coadjoint action along coadjoint orbits.
Proposition 3.1
The coadjoint actions of the groupsDiff(S1) ⋉ LGandDiff(S1) ⋉
The classification of coadjoint orbits of Vect(S1) ⋉ 𝓛𝓖 can be known from the classification of coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro and affine Kac-moody algebra. Here we obtain the following new
Theorem 3.2
A coadjoint orbit of 𝓢𝓤 (𝓖) is mapped by 𝓘 to a coadjoint orbit of
In other words, this means that if β1 ≠ 0, the elements (u1, a1, ξ1, β1) and (u1,a1, ξ2, β2) are in the same coadjoint orbit if and only if: ξ1 = ξ2, β1 = β2, (a1, β1) and (a2, β2) are on the same coadjoint orbit of
Proof
For any ϕ ϵ Diff(S1), there exists h ϵ LG such that
By direct computation we check that
This implies Theorem 3.2. □
Proposition 3.3
The map 𝓘̃ sends the coadjoint orbits of
In other words, this means that if β1 ≠ 0 the elements (u1,a1, ξ1, β1, γ1) and (u1,a1, ξ2, β2, γ2) are in the same coadjoint orbit if and only if γ1 = γ2, ξ1 = ξ2, β1 = β2, (a1, β1) and (a2, β2) are on the same coadjoint orbit of
Proposition 3.4
If the elements (u1,a1, ξ1, β1, γ1) and (u1,a1, ξ2, β2γ2) are in the same coadjoint orbit thenγ1 = γ2,
Proof
We have:
Previously, we determined Casemir functions on
Proposition 3.5
Let 𝓒Vir, 𝓒K−M 𝓒𝓐be Casimir functions for Virasoro, affine Kac–Moody, and the Heisenberg Lie algebras 𝓐 correspondingly. Let 𝓢P𝓤(𝓖),
4 Bi-hamiltonian dispersive water waves systems associated to 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)
It has been showed in [1], that the dispersive water waves system equation [9, 10, 12] is a bi–Hamiltonian system related to the semi-direct product of a Kac–Moody and Virasoro Lie algebras, and the hierarchy for this system was found. In this Section some results of [1] are obtained from another point of view. We obtain new
Proposition 4.1
The functions
The function
Let {ϕi, i ϵ I} be a set of Casimir functions and e ϵ 𝓖. Define xχ = x − χe, for some χ ϵ ℝ.
Lemma 4.2
For any (i, j)ϵ I2and any (λ, μ)ϵ ℝ2we have {ϕi(xλ), ϕj(xμ)} = {ϕi(xλ), ϕj(xμ)}e = 0.
Lemma 4.3
Supposeϕi(xλ) can be expanded in terms of inverse powers of λ with some extra functionf(λ), and modesFi,k(x), i.e.,
then {Fi,k+1, f}e = {Fi,k, f}0. We can chooseeso that the Hamiltonian
Lemma 4.4
If an elemente ϵ 𝓖 satisfies two conditions: (i) ad*(e)e = 0; (ii) for anyu ϵ 𝓖, ad*(u) ebelongs to the tangent space to the coadjoint orbit ofu (i.e., for anyu ϵ 𝓖 there exists v ϵ 𝓖 such thatad*(u)e = ad*(v)u). then the functionsϕ(a − λ e) commute with the Hamiltonian of the geodesics
5 The universal enveloping algebra of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)
When 𝓗 = ∑kϵℤ 𝓗k has a structure of graded algebra, its universal enveloping algebra 𝓤𝓗 is also naturally endowed with a structure of a graded Lie algebra. Indeed, the weight of a product h1, …, hn ϵ 𝓤𝓗 of homogeneous elements is defined to be the sum of the weights of the elements hi, i = 1, …, n. The universal enveloping algebra 𝓤𝓗 admits a filtration
where wk = ∑iϵℤui.vki which is a finite sum. Let ω1, …, ωn be two-cocycles on the Lie algebra 𝓗, let 𝓗̃ be the central extension associated with and let e1,…,en be the central elements associated with these cocycles.
The modified generalized enveloping algebra
5.1 Decomposition of the enveloping algebra of a semi-direct product
In some very particular cases, the modified generalized enveloping algebra of a semi-direct product 𝓚 ⋉ 𝓗 of two Lie algebras is isomorphic to the tensor product of some modified generalized enveloping algebras of 𝓚 and of 𝓗. Let 𝓗̃ be the central extension of 𝓗 with the two-cocycle ω𝓗. Denote by · the action of the Lie algebra 𝓚 on the Lie algebra 𝓗̃. Let us introduce the semi-direct product 𝓚 ⋉ 𝓗̃ which is a central extension of 𝓚 ⋉ 𝓗 by a two-cocycle
A two-cocycle ω𝓚 on 𝓚 defines also a two-cocycle
of 𝓚 ⋉ 𝓗. Let I be the natural inclusion of 𝓗̃ 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗) and J be the natural inclusion of 𝓗̃ into
We call the action of 𝓚 on 𝓗 realizable in 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗) when there exists a map F : 𝓚 → 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗) and a two-cocycle α on {𝓚} such that for any pair (g1, g2) in 𝓚2
and the map F satisfies the compatibility condition, i.e., for any g ϵ 𝓚 and h ϵ 𝓗̃ with the anti–commutator [F(g), I(h)] = I(g · h), of the algebra 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗).
Theorem 5.1
If the action of 𝓚 is realizable in 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗) then
Proof
Let 𝓤g = {ĝ | g ϵ 𝓚} with be the unitary subalgebra of
Since F(g1) is an element of 𝓤j and since the algebras 𝓤g and 𝓤j commute [F(g1),g2] = [F(g1), F(g2)] and [g1, F(g2)] = [F(g1), F(g2)]. Therefore:
and finally
The subalgebra 𝓤j is obviously isomorphic to 𝓤ω𝓗 (𝓗). The generalized modified enveloping algebra
□
5.2 The case of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖)
Let 𝓖 be a simple complex Lie algebra and Cφ its dual Coxeter number. Introduce the {K1,…,Kn} a basis of 𝓖, and the dual basis
where
(here dots denote the normal ordering), i.e., the action of Vect(S1) is realizable in 𝓤βωK–M (𝓛𝓖), with α = βωVir/12η. Thus we obtain
Proposition 5.2
Ifη ≠ 0, then 𝓤ξωVir, βωK–M (𝓢𝓤ℂ𝓖) ≃ 𝓤βωK–M (Vect(S1)ℂ}(ξ – α)) ⊗ 𝓤(𝓛𝓖).
The Lie algebra Vectℂ(S1) acts on the Heisenberg algebra by
In this case, on has
for a cocycle α^ = (α + γ2β-1)ωVir. For 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓒) we obtain
Proposition 5.3
Forβ ≠ 0, we have
with θ = ξ – γ2/β – 1/12.
5.3 Representations of 𝓢𝓤(𝓖)
Proposition 5.4
A positive energy representationVof 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) with non-vanishingβId-action of the cocylecK–Mbrings about a pair of commuting representations of Virasoro and affine Kac–Moody Lie algebras.
This proposition determines whether a 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) Verma module is a sub-module of another Verma module of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖). Let 𝔥 be a Cartan algebra of 𝓖 with a basis {h1, …, hk}. The Lie subalgebra 𝔨 of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) is generated by the elements {cVir, cK–M, u0, (h1)0,…,(hk)0}. A Verma module Vλ(𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖)) of 𝓢𝓤ℂ(𝓖) is associated to any linear form λ ϵ 𝔥*.
Verma modules
Suppose the action of a Casimir element of 𝓖 is given by acts by D(λ)Id for D(λ) ϵ ℂ. We then have
Proposition 5.5
Let λ be a linear form over {𝔥} uwith non-vanishing λ (cK–M). Then
whereμ (ei) = λ (ei), i = 1, …, n, definesμ, μ (cK–M) = λ (cK−M),
andv(cVir) = λ(cVir) –
References
[1] Zuevsky A., Hamiltonian structures on coadjoint orbits of semidirect product G = Diff+(S1) ⋉ C∞(S1, ℝ). Czechoslovak J. Phys., 2004, 54, no. 11, 1399-140610.1007/s10582-004-9808-9Search in Google Scholar
[2] Arnold V.I., Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, 1978, Springer10.1007/978-1-4757-1693-1Search in Google Scholar
[3] Kirillov A., Infinite dimensional Lie groups; their orbits, invariants and representations. The geometry of moments, Lecture Notes in Math., 1982, Vol. 970, 101-12310.1007/BFb0066026Search in Google Scholar
[4] Segal G., The geometry of the KdV equation, Int. J. of Modern Phys., 1991, Vol. 6, No. 16, 2859-286910.1142/S0217751X91001416Search in Google Scholar
[5] Witten E., Coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro Group, Comm. in Math. Phys., 1998, v. 114, 1-5310.1007/BF01218287Search in Google Scholar
[6] Ovsienko V., Roger C., Generalizations of Virasoro group and Virasoro algebra through extensions by modules of tensor densities on S1, 1998, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 9, no. 2, 277-28810.1016/S0019-3577(98)80024-4Search in Google Scholar
[7] Enriquez B., Khoroshkin S., Radul A., Rosly A., Rubtzov V. Poisson-Lie aspects of classical W-algebras. The interplay between differential geometry and differential equations, 1995, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 167, Adv. Math. Sci., 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 37-5910.1090/trans2/167/03Search in Google Scholar
[8] Das A., Integrable models, 1989, World Scientific Publishing10.1142/0858Search in Google Scholar
[9] Harnad J., Kupershmidt B.A., Sympletic geometries on T*G͠, Hamiltonian group actions and integrable systems, 1995, J. Geom. Phys., 16, no. 2, 168-20610.1016/0393-0440(94)00027-2Search in Google Scholar
[10] Kupershmidt B.A., Mathematics of dispersive water waves, Commun. Math. Phys., 1985, v. 99, No.1, 51-7310.1007/BF01466593Search in Google Scholar
[11] Reiman A. G., Semenov-Tyan-Shanskii M. A., Hamiltonian structure of equations of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili type. (Russian. English summary) Differential geometry, Lie groups and mechanics, VI. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI), 1984, 133, 212-227Search in Google Scholar
[12] Vishik S.M., Dolzhansky F.V., Analogues of the Euler-Poisson equations and magnetic hydrodynamics connected to Lie groups. Reports of the Academy of Science of the USSR, 1978, vol. 238, No. 5 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Zuevsky, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.