Towards a conceptualisation of intensive parenting norms: Testing exact and approximate measurement invariance across social and country contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-926Keywords:
intensive parenting, measurement invariance, European Social Survey, cross-national comparison, alignment optimization, gender, educationAbstract
Objective: We examine the measurement invariance (MI) of intensive parenting norms across three European countries as well as across gender, education, and parental status.
Background: The social norms of intensive parenting have become increasingly dominant in recent decades. However, there is no measurement model of intensive parenting norms in large-scale social surveys and it is unknown whether these norms convey the same meanings across different social and cultural contexts.
Method: This study draws on data from the European Social Survey Cross-national Online Survey panel (2017) administered in Estonia, Slovenia, and Great Britain. We conducted a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization to assess the exact and approximate MI of intensive parenting norms across three countries and social contexts.
Results: Due to a poor fit of the previously suggested four-factor model of intensive parenting norms, a revised two-factor model with stimulation and child-centred dimensions - excluding items that measure expert guidance and parental responsibility - was proposed. The two-factor model attained scalar invariance between educational groups and between parents of children aged under 12 years and others; however, only metric invariance was achieved among countries, gender, and parental status. The alignment optimization results suggest that the reduced scale is approximately invariant across all examined groups.
Conclusion: This study highlights that the MI of parenting norms should not just be assumed but tested. This study provides insights into the conceptualisation of intensive parenting norms and recommendations for future research and development on measurement.
References
Amato, P. R., & Fowler, F. (2002). Parenting practices, child adjustment, and family diversity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 703–716. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3599936 [retrieved March 14, 2022] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00703.x
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Multiple group factor analysis. The American Statistician, 37(4), 326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2682781
Braun, M. (2009). The role of cultural contexts in item interpretation: The example of gender roles. In The International Social Survey Programme 1984-2009: Charting the Globe (pp. 395–407).
Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872–882. http://www.unioviedo.net/reunido/index.php/PST/article/view/8744 [retrieved March 14, 2022]
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2019). How to obtain comparable measures for cross-national comparisons. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 71(S1), 157–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-019-00598-7
Craig, L., Powell, A., & Smyth, C. (2014). Towards intensive parenting? Changes in the composition and determinants of mothers’ and fathers’ time with children 1992-2006. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 555–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12035
Crapo, J. S., Miller, J. A., Bradford, K., & Higginbotham, B. J. (2021). Mothering and fathering, or just parenting: measurement invariance of parental beliefs by gender. Journal of Family Issues, 42(12), 2782–2810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20988772
Davidov, E., Meuleman, B., Cieciuch, J., Schmidt, P., & Billiet, J. (2014). Measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Annual Review of Sociology, 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137
Dotti Sani, G. M., & Treas, J. (2016). Educational gradients in parents’ child-care time across countries, 1965–2012. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(4), 1083–1096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12305
Dyer, W. J. (2015). The vital role of measurement equivalence in family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(4), 415–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12115
England, P., & Srivastava, A. (2013). Educational differences in US parents’ time spent in child care: The role of culture and cross-spouse influence. Social Science Research, 42(4), 971–988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.03.003
Fagan, J., Day, R., Lamb, M. E., & Cabrera, N. J. (2014). Should researchers conceptualize differently the dimensions of parenting for fathers and mothers? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 390–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12044
Faircloth, C. (2010). What science says is best: Parenting practices, scientific authority and maternal identity. Sociological Research Online, 15(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2175
Faircloth, C., Hoffman, D. M., & Layne, L. L. (2013). Parenting in global perspective. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203103906
Forbes, L. K., Donovan, C., & Lamar, M. R. (2020). Differences in intensive parenting attitudes and gender norms among U. S. mothers. The Family Journal, 28(1), 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719893964
Gauthier, A. H., Bryson, C., Fadel, L., Haux, T., & Mynarska, M. (2021). Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study. Demographic Research, 44(13). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.13
Gauthier, A. H., & de Jong, P. W. (2021). Costly children: the motivations for parental investment in children in a low fertility context. Genus, 77(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00111-5
Gauthier, A. H., Smeeding, T. M., & Furstenberg, F. J. (2004). Are parents investing less time in children ? Trends in selected industrialized countries. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 647–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00036.x
Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
Hulen, E. (2021). What is natural is best: A qualitative exploration of women’s engagement in attachment parenting. Journal of Family Issues, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X21993885
Ishizuka, P. (2019). Social class, gender, and contemporary parenting standards in the United States: Evidence from a national survey experiment. Social Forces, 98(September), 31–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy107
Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2006). Constructing the “good mother”: The experience of mothering ideologies by work status. Sex Roles, 54(7–8), 509–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9021-3
Kalil, A., Ryan, R., & Corey, M. (2012). Diverging destinies: Maternal education and the developmental gradient in time with children. Demography, 49(4), 1361–1383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0129-5
Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520949904
Lee, E. (2014). Experts and parenting culture. In E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, & J. Macvarish (Eds.), Parenting culture studies (pp. 51–75). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304612_3
Leitgöb, H., Seddig, D., Asparouhov, T., Behr, D., Davidov, E., De Roover, K., Jak, S., Meitinger, K., Menold, N., Muthén, B., Rudnev, M., Schmidt, P., & van de Schoot, R. (2022). Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives. Social Science Research, 110, 102805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805
Liss, M., Schiffrin, H. H., Mackintosh, V. H., Miles-McLean, H., & Erchull, M. J. (2013). Development and validation of a quantitative measure of intensive parenting attitudes. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 621–636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9616-y
Lomazzi, V. (2018). Using alignment optimization to test the measurement invariance of gender role attitudes in 59 countries. Methods, Data, Analyses., 12(1), 1–27.
Long, H., Prikhidko, A., Bendeck, A. C., & Yumusak, S. (2021). Measurement invariance of the intensive parenting attitudes questionnaire across gender and race. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(7), 1027–1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000889
Loyal, D., Sutter Dallay, A.-L., & Rascle, N. (2017). Intensive mothering ideology in France: A pilot study. Encephale, 43(6), 564–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2017.08.002
Loyal, D., Sutter Dallay, A. L., & Rascle, N. (2021). Validity of the measure of intensive mothering ideology (MIMI). Encephale, 47(1), 4–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.019
Luong, R., & Flake, J. K. (2022). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 17(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qr32u
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modelling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 313–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). New methods for the study of measurement Invariance with many groups. Mplus Web Notes, 1–60. https://www.statmodel.com/download/PolAn.pdf [retrieved May 25, 2022]
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2014). IRT studies of many groups: the alignment method. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(978), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00978
Mynarska, M., & Rytel, J. (2020). Fertility desires of childless Poles: Which childbearing motives matter for men and women? Journal of Family Issues, 41(1), 7–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19868257
Nomaguchi, K., & Milkie, M. A. (2020). Parenthood and well-being: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 198–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12646
O’Brien, K. M., Yoo, S., Kim, Y. H., Cho, Y., & Salahuddin, N. M. (2020). The good mothering expectations scale : An international instrument development study. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(2), 162 –190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019889895
Ramaekers, S., & Suissa, J. (2012). What all parents need to know? Exploring the hidden normativity of the language of developmental psychology in parenting. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 352–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2012.00866.x
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
Rizzo, K. M., Schiffrin, H. H., & Liss, M. (2013). Insight into the parenthood paradox: Mental health outcomes of intensive mothering. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22(5), 614–620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9615-z
Robert, C., Lee, W. C., & Chan, K. Y. (2006). An empirical analysis of measurement equivalence with the INDCOL measure of individualism and collectivism: Implications for valid cross-cultural inference. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 65–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00804.x
Romagnoli, A., & Wall, G. (2012). ‘I know I’m a good mom’: Young, low-income mothers’ experiences with risk perception, intensive parenting ideology and parenting education programmes. Health, Risk & Society, 14(3), 273–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2012.662634
Russell, N. U. (2015). Babywearing in the age of the internet. Journal of Family Issues, 36(9), 1130–1153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14533547
Schiffrin, H. H., Godfrey, H., Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2015). Intensive parenting: Does it have the desired impact on child outcomes? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(8), 2322–2331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0035-0
Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Geary, K., Miles-McLean, H., Tashner, T., Hagerman, C., & Rizzo, K. (2014). Mother, father, or parent? College students’ intensive parenting attitudes differ by referent. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(6), 1073–1080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9764-8
Seddig, D., & Lomazzi, V. (2019). Using cultural and structural indicators to explain measurement noninvariance in gender role attitudes with multilevel structural equation modeling. Social Science Research, 84, 102328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102328
Shaffer, A., Rodriguez, V. J., Kolko, D. J., Pilkonis, P. A., & Lindhiem, O. (2022). Measurement invariance in the Alabama parenting questionnaire: Implications for culturally inclusive parenting research. Journal of Family Issues, 43(8), 2040–2062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211030022
Shirani, F., Henwood, K., & Coltart, C. (2012). Meeting the challenges of intensive parenting Culture: Gender, risk management and the moral parent. Sociology, 46(1), 25–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416169
Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 111–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthén, B. (2013). Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: A comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770
van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). Developmetrics. A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
Villar, A., Sommer, E., Finnøy, D., Gaia, A., Berzelak, N., & Bottoni, G. (2018). CROss-National Online Survey (CRONOS) panel: Data and documentation user guide. 654221. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/cronos/CRONOS_user_guide_e01_1.pdf [retrieved May 25, 2022]
Wall, G. (2018). ‘Love builds brains’: representations of attachment and children’s brain development in parenting education material. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40(3), 395–409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12632
Walls, J. K., Helms, H. M., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2016). Intensive mothering beliefs among full-time employed mothers of infants. Journal of Family Issues, 37(2), 245–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X13519254
Zercher, F., Schmidt, P., Cieciuch, J., & Davidov, E. (2015). The comparability of the universalism value over time and across countries in the European Social Survey: Exact vs. approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(733), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00733
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Funding data
-
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Grant numbers 21-18014S
