Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2023, 59(6): 593-616 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.027

Manoeuvring towards Success: Reconstruction of the State and Its Effective Campaign Countering Corruption and State Capture

Jaromír Mazák ORCID...1, Lucie Němcová ORCID...2
1 Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague
2 Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague

In the period from 2013 to 2017, the Czech Parliament passed five bills against corruption. A civil initiative called Reconstruction of the State was heavily involved in the process. Before the 2013 elections, the initiative prompted the candidates running for an MP mandate to publicly commit to supporting selected legislation proposals. The initiative used a variety of advocacy and campaign tactics to support passing the bills after the elections. This paper uses process tracing to answer the following research questions: (1) What path led to this success?, (2) Is there sufficient evidence about the actual role of the initiative in seeing the proposals passed by the Parliament? and (3) What has determined the initiative’s advocacy decisions? The first research question is treated descriptively, focusing on the key milestones in this historically unique advocacy campaign. To answer the second question, we conducted a non-formal counterfactual assessment of whether the absence of the initiative would have resulted in passing fewer proposals. This is important for evaluating civil society’s potential to effectively influence the political process. Finally, in answering the third question, we show that advocacy tactics have markedly changed throughout the Reconstruction of the State campaign. Building on this observation, we argue that tactics are not only policy- or campaign-specific but also change within a single case.

Keywords: advocacy campaign, state capture, anti-corruption, transparency, civil society, Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)

Received: May 1, 2022; Revised: March 13, 2023; Accepted: April 11, 2023; Prepublished online: June 14, 2023; Published: January 23, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mazák, J., & Němcová, L. (2023). Manoeuvring towards Success: Reconstruction of the State and Its Effective Campaign Countering Corruption and State Capture. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 59(6), 593-616. doi: 10.13060/csr.2023.027
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andrews, K. T., Ganz, M., Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Leadership, membership, and voice: Civic associations that work. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1191-1242. https://doi.org/10.1086/649060 Go to original source...
    2. Batory, A. (2012). Why do anti-corruption laws fail in Central Eastern Europe? A target compliance perspective. Regulation & Governance, 6(1), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01125.x Go to original source...
    3. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2016). Causal case study methods: Foundations and guidelines for comparing, matching, and tracing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6576809. Go to original source...
    4. Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider's critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1997.tb00445.x Go to original source...
    5. Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2015). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423916000895 Go to original source...
    6. Beyers, J. (2004). Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics, 5(2), 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116504042442 Go to original source...
    7. Binderkrantz, A. (2005). Interest group strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694-715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00552.x Go to original source...
    8. Camyar, I. (2010). Europeanization, domestic legacies and administrative reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: A comparative analysis of Hungary and the Czech Republic. European Integration, 32(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330903274664 Go to original source...
    9. Císař, O. (2010). Externally sponsored contention: The channelling of environmental movement organisations in the Czech Republic after the fall of Communism. Environmental Politics, 19(5), 736-755. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.508305 Go to original source...
    10. Císař, O. (2013). The diffusion of public interest mobilisation: A historical sociology perspective on advocates without members in the post-communist Czech Republic. East European Politics, 29(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.766171 Go to original source...
    11. Císař, O. & Navrátil, J. (2015). Promoting competition or cooperation? The impact of EU funding on Czech advocacy organizations. Democratization, 22(3), 536-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.869742 Go to original source...
    12. Císař, O., & Navrátil, J. (2019). For the people, by the people? The Czech radical and populist right after the refugee crisis. In M. Caiani, & O. Císař (Eds.), Radical right movements parties in Europe. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315123851-12 Go to original source...
    13. Císař, O., & Navrátil, J. (2022). Strategic capacity in the context of the European multilevel polity: Post-accession environmental protest in the Czech Republic.' Environmental Politics, 31(7), 1244-1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2060666 Go to original source...
    14. Colli, F., & Adriaensen, J. (2020). Lobbying the state or the market? A framework to study civil society organizations' strategic behavior. Regulation & Governance, 14(3), 501-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12227 Go to original source...
    15. Doherty, B., & Hayes, G. (2012). Tactics, traditions and opportunities: British and French crop-trashing actions in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 51(4), 540-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02048.x Go to original source...
    16. della Porta, D. (2018). Anti-corruption from below. Social movements against corruption in late neoliberalism. Partecipazione e conflitto, 10(3), 661-692. https://doi.org./10.1285/i20356609v10i3p661
    17. Ďurďovič, M. (2012). Názor na rozšířenost a míru korupce u veřejných činitelů a institucí. [Views on the prevalence and extent of corruption among public officials and institutions]. Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i. [The Public Opinion Research Centre, Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences]. (cit. 18.3.2022) https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/ documents/c2/a1248/f9/po120405.pdf.
    18. Fagan, A. (2004). Environment and democracy in the Czech Republic: The environmental movement in the transition process. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420604 Go to original source...
    19. Fagan, A. (2005). Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization, 12(4), 528-547. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13510340500226077 Go to original source...
    20. Falkner, G., & Treib, O. (2008). Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 293-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.x Go to original source...
    21. Fazekas, M., & Tóth, I. J. (2016). From corruption to state capture: A new analytical framework with empirical applications from Hungary. Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639137 Go to original source...
    22. Hanley, S. (2012). Dynamics of new party formation in the Czech Republic 1996-2010: Looking for the origins of a 'political earthquake'. East European Politics, 28(2), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.669733 Go to original source...
    23. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. The World Bank. http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-2444 Go to original source...
    24. Henderson, S. L. (2002). Selling civil society: Western aid and the nongovernmental organization sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035002001 Go to original source...
    25. Howard, M. M. (2002). The weakness of postcommunist civil society. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0008 Go to original source...
    26. Innes, A. (2014). The political economy of state capture in Central Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12079 Go to original source...
    27. Jasper, J. M. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361 Go to original source...
    28. Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015 Go to original source...
    29. Klásková, M., & Císař, O. (2021). Agents of Europeanization: Think tanks discussing the refugee crisis in the Czech Republic'. East European Politics and Societies, 35(3), 837-859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420941092 Go to original source...
    30. Korolczuk, E., & Saxonberg, S. (2015). Strategies of contentious action: A comparative analysis of the women's movements in Poland and the Czech Republic. European Societies, 17(4), 404-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2014.977321 Go to original source...
    31. Kotchegura, A. (2004). Reducing Corruption in Post-Communist Countries. International Public Management Review, 5(1), 138-156. Go to original source...
    32. Mazák, J., & Diviák, T. (2018). Transactional activism without transactions: Network perspective on anti-corruption activism in the Czech Republic. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1404904 Go to original source...
    33. McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2018). The political context of social movements. The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 2, 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168577.ch1 Go to original source...
    34. McAdam D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805431 Go to original source...
    35. McMahon, P. C. (2001). Building civil societies in East Central Europe: The effect of American non-governmental organizations on women's groups. Democratization, 8(2), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000196 Go to original source...
    36. Mendelson, S., & Glenn, J. (Eds.). (2002). The power and limits of NGOs. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/mend12490 Go to original source...
    37. Minkoff, D., Aisenbrey, S., & Agnone, J. (2008). Organizational diversity in the US advocacy sector. Social Problems, 55(4), 525-548. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2008.55.4.525 Go to original source...
    38. Morkes, J. (2008). Analýza preferenčního hlasování ve volbách do PS PČR.' [Analysis of preferential voting in the elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic]. Evropská Volební Studia, 3(1), 1-33. http://ispo.fss.muni.cz/uploads/EVS/005/EVS_3_1_1.pdf
    39. Narozhna, T. (2004). Foreign aid for a post-euphoric Eastern Europe: The limitations of Western assistance in developing civil society. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800024 Go to original source...
    40. Navrátil, J., & Pospíšil, M. (2013). Dreams of civil society twenty years after: The case of the Czech Republic. In Democratization, Marketization, and the Third Sector, International Society for Third Sector Research (ISTR) Conference Working Papers Series (Vol. 8). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236668406_NAVRATIL_Jiri_a_ POSPISIL_Miroslav_Dreams_of_Civil_Society_Twenty_Years_After_The_Case_of_ the_Czech_Republic_In_ISTR_International_Society_for_Third_Sector_Research_ Democratization_Marketization_and_th
    41. O'Dwyer, C. (2006). Runaway state-building: Patronage politics and democratic development. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    42. Perottino, M., Stauber, J., & Šárovec, D. (2020). Reconstruction of the state: Lobbying against political corruption in the Czech Republic. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2054 Go to original source...
    43. Petrova, T., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006291189 Go to original source...
    44. Pirro, A. L., & della Porta, D. (2020). On corruption and state capture: The struggle of anti-corruption activism in Hungary. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(3), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1798684 Go to original source...
    45. Skocpol, T. (1999). Associations without members. American Prospect, 45, 66-73.
    46. Snow, D., Benford, R., McCammon, H., Hewitt, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2014). The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since 'frame alignment'. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.19.1.x74278226830m69l Go to original source...
    47. Waller, M. (2010). The environmental issue in the East of Europe: Top-down, bottom-up and outside-in. Environmental Politics, 19(5), 831-849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.508315 Go to original source...
    48. Zakaria, P. (2013). Is corruption an enemy of civil society? The case of Central and Eastern Europe. International Political Science Review, 34(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512112466880 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content