Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Technocratic Populist Loop: Clashes Between Parliamentary and Popular Sovereignty in EU’s Eastern and Southern Periphery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sovereignty in Conflict

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

This chapter starts from an apparent paradox. Key policy competences in economic governance have shifted to the supranational level within the European Union, since the Maastricht Treaty onwards. At the same time, calls and procedures for the national parliaments of member states to act up and provide scrutiny, accountability, and thus, legitimacy to EU policy-making have been on the rise. The surveillance role of the national parliaments, however, especially in the field of macro-economic policy, is rooted in an idealized vision of national parliaments. European integration has more often than not disempowered the parliaments of member states. Furthermore, we live in times of a profound crisis of party politics and a crisis of representation, with parliaments enjoying less and less trust from society. Both these developments trigger conflicts of sovereignty in national polities where different claims about where the final authority lies are clashing with each other. In the aftermath of the 2008 economic crisis, this has become particularly visible in Southern and Eastern Europe, where claims to popular sovereignty have strongly clashed with claims to parliamentary sovereignty. In the two paired comparisons analysed in this chapter—Greece and Slovenia, on one hand, Italy and Bulgaria, on the other—we interpret these sovereignty conflicts in a dialectic fashion: these conflicts are only caused by the weakening of parliaments, they also contribute to their further weakening, and therefore, further impeding their role of scrutiny in European multilevel governance. Against this background, a specific political praxis—identified as technopopulism—is gaining strength. Technopopulists, we find, invoke popular sovereignty to weaken parliaments and invoke parliamentary sovereignty to ignore the people. Ultimately, both popular and parliamentary sovereignty remain trapped in a technopopulist loop that not only reflects new conflicts of sovereignty but also exacerbates them, leading to a state of permanent crisis of democratic legitimacy.

This output was supported by the NPO “Systemic Risk Institute” number LX22NPO5101, funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, NPO: EXCELES).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badiou, A., Butler, J., Didi-Huberman, G., Khiari, S., Rancière, J., & Bourdieu, P. (2016). What is a people? Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R., & Kröger, S. (2014, April). Domesticating the democratic deficit? The Role of National Parliaments and Parties in the EU’s System of Governance. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(2), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss045

  • Bergman, M. E. (2020, September 14). Italy’s constitutional referendum: yet another reform to improve the country’s governability. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog. Blog Entry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. (2009). From Brezhnev to Brussels: Transformations of Sovereignty in Eastern Europe. International Politics, 46(6), 732–752. Palgrave Macmillan, 1384–5748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. (2012). European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. (2016). The European Union: A Citizen’s Guide. Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C., & Brack, N. (2022). Implementing the will of the people: Sovereignty and policy conflicts in the aftermath of the UK’s referendum on EU membership. Comparative European Politics, 20, 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00271-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. & Accetti, C. I. (2021). Technopopulism: The new logic of democratic politics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C., Brack, N., Coman, R., & Crespy, A. (2022). Unravelling sovereignty conflicts in an era of politicization. Comparative European Politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biezen, I., & Kopecky, P. (2014). The Cartel Party and the State: Party–State Linkages in European Democracies. Party Politics, 170–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokker, P. (2016). “Vote Yes for a Safe Italy” or “Vote No to Defend the Constitution”: Italian constitutional politics between majoritarianism and civil resistance. Verfassungs Blog. On Matters Constitutional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borbáth, E., & Gessler, T. (2020). Different worlds of contention? Protest in Northwestern, Southern and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • BPSA Open Letter. (2016). 30 пoлитoлoзи cpeщy пpeдлoжeнaтa oт Cлaви Tpифoнoв мaжopитapнa cиcтeмa. https://offnews.bg/izbori/30-politolozi-sreshtu-predlozhenata-ot-slavi-trifonov-mazhoritarna-sis-639159.html

  • Brack, N., Coman, R., & Crespy, A. (2019). Unpacking old and new conflicts of sovereignty in the European polity. Journal of European Integration, 41(7), 817–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruszt, L., & Vukov, V. (2017). Making states for the single market: European integration and the reshaping of economic states in the Southern and Eastern peripheries of Europe. West European Politics, 40(4), 663–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarini, L., & Bordignon, F. (2017). Referendum on Renzi: The 2016 Vote on the Italian Constitutional Revision. South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coman, R., & Leconte, C. (2019). Contesting EU authority in the name of European identity: The new clothes of the sovereignty discourse in Central Europe. Journal of European Integration, 41(7), 855–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, A., & Ladi, S. (2019). In the name of ‘the people’? Popular sovereignty and the 2015 Greek referendum. Journal of European Integration, 41(7), 871–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, A., & Rone, J. (2022). Conflicts of sovereignty over EU trade policy: A new constitutional settlement? Comparative European Politics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-022-00272-x

  • Crum, B. (2018). Parliamentary accountability in multilevel governance: What role for parliaments in post-crisis EU economic governance? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 268–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2020). How social movements can save democracy: Democratic innovations from below. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink-Hafner, D. (2011). Interest representation and post-communist parliaments over two decades. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(2), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink-Hafner, D. (2014). Post-accession politicization of national EU policy coordination: The case of Slovenia. Public Administration, 92(1), 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagyi, A. (2015). Social movement studies for East Central Europe? The challenge of a time-space bias on postwar western societies. Social Movements and Contentious Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, 1(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2017) The mask and the flag. Populism, citizenism and global protest. Hurst Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2022). The great recoil. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2014). Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU’s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect. Article in JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12174

  • Guasti, P., & Buštíková, L. (2020). Varieties of technocratic populism around the world. Politics and Governance, 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2015). The lure of techocracy. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halikiopoulou, D. (2020). Economic crisis, poor governance and the rise of populism: The case of Greece. Intereconomics, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K., Akkerman, A., & Zaslove, A. (2018). The voice of populist people? Referendum preferences, practices and populist attitudes. Acta Politica, 53, 517–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschgaessner, S. (2016). After Trump victory, Italy referendum is seen as test of populism's rise. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/24/after-trump-victory-italy-referendum-is-seen-as-test-of-populisms-rise

  • Lipset, S. M., & Stein, R. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maatsch, A. (2015). Empowered or disempowered? The role of national parliaments during the reform of European economic governance, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 15/10, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maatsch, A., & Cooper, I. (2017). Governance without democracy? Analysing the role of parliaments in European economic governance after the crisis: Introduction to the special issue. Parliamentary Affairs, 70, 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matej, A., & Cernic, J. L. (2020). The impact of European institutions on the rule of law and democracy: Slovenia and beyond. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2005). Party system change approaches and interpretations. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2006). Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracy, New Left Review, 42, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of Western democracy. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malova, D., & Haughton, T. (2002). Making Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe, and the Impact of Europe. West European Politics, 25, 101–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J.-W. (2012). Beyond militant democracy? New Left Review, 73(43–4), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquino, G., & Valbruzzi, M. (2017). Italy says no: The 2016 constitutional referendum and its consequences. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 22(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquer, J., & Jäger, A. M. M. (2020). After the Cartel Party: ‘Extra-Party’ and ‘Intra-Party’ Techno-Populism. Politics and Governance, 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, S. (2021). Cyвepeн тyк, cyвepeн тaм. Кaквo e вcъщнocт “cyвepeн”? https://www.svobodnaevropa.bg/a/31434009.html

  • Raik, K. (2004). EU Accession of Central and Eastern European Countries: Democracy and Integration as Conflicting Logics. East European Politics and Societies, 18,(4), 567–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roederer-Rynning, C. (2017). Parliamentary assertion and deep integration: The European parliament in the CETA and TTIP negotiations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(5–6), 507–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roederer-Rynning, C., & Kallestrup, M. (2017). National parliaments and the new contentiousness of trade. Journal of European Integration, 39(7), 811–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rone, J. (2020). Contesting free trade and austerity in the EU: Protest diffusion in complex media and political economies. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rone, J. (2021). Backsliding of the left: Or how Viktor Orbán’s right-wing conservative illiberalism emerged as a normative ideal in Bulgarian political discourse. European Politics and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1956239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rone, J. (2022). Instrumentalising sovereignty claims in British pro- and anti-Brexit mobilisations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221089136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2011). Democratic legitimacy: Impartiality, reflexivity, proximity. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe: The EU and national polities. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skazlic, I. (2021). Routine or rare activity? A quantitative assessment of parliamentary scrutiny in the European semester. Politics and Governance, 9(3), 112–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoychev, S. (2017). The 2016 referendum in Bulgaria. East European Quarterly, 45(3–4), 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Topaloff, L. (2017). The rise of referendums: Elite strategy or populist weapon? Journal of Democracy, 28(3), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudzarovska, E. (2021). Legitimation strategies and national parliaments. The case of anti-corruption. In Lord, Christopher et al. (Eds.), The Politics of Legitimation in the European Union, Legitimacy Recovered?. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2020). Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varoufakis, Y. (2017). Adults in the room: My battle with Europe’s deep establishment. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willkinson, M. (2021). Tranformation of modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2020). Politics of last resort: Governing by emergency in the European union. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2021). Politics of the last resort. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woźniakowski, T., Maatsch, A., & Miklin, E. (2021). Rising to a challenge? Ten years of parliamentary accountability of the European semester. Politics and Governance, 9(3), 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, L. (2021). Prefigurative politics and social movement strategy: The roles of prefiguration in the reproduction, mobilisation and coordination of movements. Political Studies, 69(4), 1033–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Sociology, Prague, Czech Republic

    Emilija Tudzarovska

  2. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England

    Julia Rone

Authors
  1. Emilija Tudzarovska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julia Rone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilija Tudzarovska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy at CRASSH, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Julia Rone

  2. Cevipol & Institut d’études européennes, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Nathalie Brack

  3. Cevipol & Institut d’études européennes, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Ramona Coman

  4. Cevipol & Institut d’études européennes, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Amandine Crespy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tudzarovska, E., Rone, J. (2023). The Technocratic Populist Loop: Clashes Between Parliamentary and Popular Sovereignty in EU’s Eastern and Southern Periphery. In: Rone, J., Brack, N., Coman, R., Crespy, A. (eds) Sovereignty in Conflict. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27729-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation