Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous use of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques in the study of microorganisms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Folia Microbiologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simultaneous application of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques has been used to study the internal structure of microbial cells. The dark field technique displays subtle cell structures like glowing objects on a dark background. In the polarizing microscope, cross polarizing filters along with the first-order quartz compensator and a rotary table show the maximum birefringence of the individual structures. The material containing microorganisms was collected in the villages of Sýkořice and Zbečno (Křivoklátsko Protected Landscape Area). The objects were studied in a laboratory microscope Carl Zeiss Jena type NfpK equipped with In Ph 160 basic body with variable dark field, special condenser with interchangeable diaphragm apertures, a rotary table, Meopta Praha polarizer, analyzer, first-order quartz compensator from LOMO Sankt Petersburg, and a digital Nikon D 70 DSLR camera. Three orders of microorganisms were studied: Siphonocladales, Chlorococcales, and Peritricha. Anisotropic structures in different amounts and sizes (e.g., granules and microfibrils) or in different configurations (e.g., cell walls or pellicle) have been found in all Protista organisms under study. Filamentous algae of the genus Cladophora (Cladophoraceae, Siphonocladales, Ulvophyceae) featured a strongly birefringent cell wall (shape birefringence) surrounded by less birefringent periphyton (microbial biofilm), at the edges of which cyanobacterial fibers could be recognized—a very important finding. The coccal algae of the genus Scenedesmus (Scenedesmataceae, Chlorococcales, Chlorophyceae) exhibited not only strongly birefringent granules, but also strongly birefringent microfibrils in the cytoplasm outside the strongly birefringent cell walls—very important finding. Of all the studied microorganisms, the weakest birefringence was shown in the surface membrane (pellicle) of the Vorticella (Vorticellidae, Peritricha, Ciliata). On the other hand, the ring of cilia on the top of the body had a somewhat stronger birefringence—an important finding. In conclusion, the dark field technique provides a high contrast image in the microscope and, if supplemented simultaneously by polarization microscopy, will allow us to partially infer the composition of the examined structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beyer H (1954) Das phasenkontrastverfahren in der Mikroskopie. Urania 17:639–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocksch D (1994) Phase-contrast, Nomarski (differential interference) contrast and dark-field microscopy: black and white and color photomicrography. In: Celis JE (ed) Cell Biology, vol 2. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter-Lund H, Lund JWG (1995) Freshwater algae, their microscopic WorAld explored. Biopress Ltd, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham EL, Wilcox LW (2000) Algae. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorová M, Fojt B, Vávra V (2002) Microscopy of raw and technical materials (in Czech). Publishing House of Faculty of Science Masaryk University, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath JP (2005) Dictionary of microscopy. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman R (1977) The modulation contrast microscopy: principles and performance. J Microsc 110:205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoué S (2011) Lighting the way in microscopy. J Cell Biol 194:810–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jírovec O, Černý W, Esslová M, Fiala J, Kramář J, Lellák J, Novák K, Rosický B, Skuhravý V, Straškraba M, Štěpánek O (1958) Zoological techniques (in Czech). State Pedagogical Publishing House, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozubek M (2017) Reliable cell image analysis. Functional Organization of the Cell Nucleus Symposium. Charles University, Praha: 7

  • Patterson DJ (2003) Free-living freshwater Protozoa. A colour guide. ASM Press, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piper J (2007) Relief phase contrast: a new technique for phase contrast light microscopy. Microsc Anal (Europe) 21(108):9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper J (2013) Height grade visualization of stained biological specimens in polarized light. J Adv Microsc Res 8(2):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser V (1989) Experimental methods of biophysics (in Czech). Academia, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulík M, Holá V, Růžička F, Votava M, Baudyšová D, Gallo J, Kaprálová S, Kohušová K, Koukalová D, Kůdela V, Mikeš J, Novotný R, Siglová M, Toršová V, Zimák J (2011) Microbial biofilms (in Czech). Palacký University, Olomouc

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedentopf H (1907) Die Vorgeschichte der Spiegelkondensoren. Z Wiss Mikrosk 24:257–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker P, Boughner DR, Kloner RA (1989) Analysis of healing after myocardial infarction using polarized light microscopy. Am J Pathol 134(4):879–893

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J (1954) Microscopical technique (in Czech). State Health Publishing House, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernike F (1935) Das Phasenkontrastverfahren beider mikroskopischen Beobachtung. Z Techn Phys 16:454–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2012) Simple sets for digital microphotography used and tested in the study of microorganisms. Folia Microbiol 57:509–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2014) Anisotropic structures of some microorganisms studied by polarization microscopy. Folia Microbiol 59:363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2016) Simultaneous use of relief contrast and polarization microscopy in the study of microorganisms. Fine Mech Optics 61:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2018a) Concomitant use of polarization and negative phase contrast microscopy for the study of microorganisms. Folia Microbiol 63(4):493–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2018b) Concomitant use of colour phase contrast and polarization microscopy for the study of microorganisms. Fine Mech Optics 63:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z (2019) Reconstruction of the portable microscope Meopta BC 28 SV into polarized microscope and its use for the study of microorganisms. Fine Mech Optics 64:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z, Gabriel J (2015) Concomitant use of polarization and positive phase contrast microscopy for the study of microbial cells. Folia Microbiol 60:545–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižka Z, Hostounský Z, Kálalová S (1999) RCH-microscopy used in microbiological studies. Folia Microbiol 44:328–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the LO 1509 grant from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdeněk Žižka.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Žižka, Z. Simultaneous use of polarization microscopy and dark field techniques in the study of microorganisms. Folia Microbiol 66, 183–187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-020-00809-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-020-00809-1

Navigation