Skip to main content
Log in

The Proteocephalus species-aggregate (Cestoda) in cyprinoids, pike, eel, smelt and cavefish of the Nearctic region (North America): diversity, host associations and distribution

  • Published:
Systematic Parasitology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tapeworms (Cestoda) of the Proteocephalus-species aggregate from cyprinoids, pike, eel, smelt and cavefish in the Nearctic region (North America) are reviewed, based on a critical examination of newly collected and museum specimens. For some species neither new nor museum specimens were available and only literature data were used for these taxa. Two species occur in North American cyprinoids: (i) Nearctic Proteocephalus buplanensis Mayes, 1976 in Semotilus atromaculatus (Mitchill) in the upper Mississippi River and Hudson Bay drainage basins, and (ii) Holarctic P. torulosus (Batsch, 1786) (syns. P. ptychocheilus Faust, 1919; P. cobraeformis Haderlie, 1953; and Ophiotaenia critica Mpoame & Landers, 1981, new synonym), which occurs in Ptychocheilus spp. and other leuciscids in the western part of North America. Proteocephalus pinguis La Rue, 1911 is a specific parasite of pike (Esox spp.), which is briefly redescribed here to establish its diagnostic morphological characteristics because the original description was based on a mixture of at least two species. In addition to P. pinguis, pike serve as postyclic hosts of several species of the Proteocephalus-aggregate typical of other fish, such as bass, perch and whitefish, namely P. fluviatilis Bangham, 1925, P. pearsei La Rue, 1919 and P. longicollis (Zeder, 1800). Cavefish (Amblyopsidae) in North America harbour two endemic species, P. chologasteri Whittaker & Hill, 1968 from Chologaster agassizii Putman and P. poulsoni Whittaker & Zober, 1978 from Amblyopsis spelaea DeKay, which have never been found since their original description and their validity should be confirmed based on new collections and molecular data. Two other species of the Proteocephalus–aggregate, P. macrocephalus (Creplin, 1825), a parasite of eels (Anguilla spp.), and P. tetrastomus (Rudolphi, 1810) from smelt (Osmeridae), have circumboreal (Holarctic) distribution. Molecular data are available only for three of the seven species treated herein, but they do not form a monophyletic group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amin, O. M. (1977). Distribution of fish parasites from two southeast Wisconsin streams. Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, 65, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, O. M. (1990). Cestoda from lake fishes in Wisconsin: occurrence of Proteocephalus in Esox and other fish species. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 57, 132–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, O. M., & Mackiewicz, J. S. (1977). Proteocephalus buplanensis Mayes, 1976 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) from Semotilus atromaculatus in Wisconsin. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 44, 228–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangham, R. V. (1944). Parasites of northern Wisconsin fish. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 36, 291–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangham, R. V. (1955). Studies on fish parasites of Lake Huron and Manitoulin Island. American Midland Naturalist, 53, 184–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangham, R. V., & Venard, C. E. (1942). Studies on parasites of Reelfoot Lake fish. IV, Distribution studies and check-list of parasites. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sciences, 17, 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. C. (1983) Fishes of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press. 1052 pp.

  • de Chambrier, A., Binh, T. T., & Scholz, T. (2012). Ophiotaenia bungari n. sp. (Cestoda), a parasite of Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider) (Ophidia: Elapidae) from Vietnam, with comments on relative ovarian size as a new and potentially useful diagnostic character for proteocephalidean tapeworms. Systematic Parasitology, 81, 39–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Chambrier, A., Scholz, T., Mariaux., J., & Kuchta, R. (2017). Onchoproteocephalidea I Caira, Jensen, Waeschenbach, Olson & Littlewood, 2014. In: Caira, J. N. & Jensen, K. (Eds) Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (2008–2017): Tapeworms from Vertebrate Bowels of the Earth. Lawrence, Kansas, USA: University of Kansas, Natural History Museum, Special Publication No. 25, pp. 251–277.

  • de Chambrier, A., Waeschenbach, A., Fisseha, M., Scholz, T., & Mariaux, J. (2015). A large 28S rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological characters for classification of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda). ZooKeys, 500, 25–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chambrier, A., Zehnder, M. P., Vaucher, C., & Mariaux, J. (2004). The evolution of the Proteocephalidea (Platyhelminthes, Eucestoda) based on an enlarged molecular phylogeny, with comments on their uterine development. Systematic Parasitology, 57, 159–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. C. (1982). Seasonal occurrence of helminths in freshwater fishes. Part IV. Adult Cestoda, Nematoda and Acanthocephala Advances in Parasitology, 20, 1–292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, C. M. (1850). Systema helminthum (Vol. I, p. 680). Vindobonae: Sumptibus Academiae Caesareae scientiarum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doby, J. M., & Jarecka, L. (1966). Complément à la connaissance de la morphologie et de la biologie de Proteocephalus macrocephalus (Creplin, 1825), cestode parasite de l’anguille. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée, 41, 429–442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, E. C. (1919). Two new Proteocephalidae. Journal of Parasitology, 6, 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischthal, J. H. (1947). Parasites of northwest Wisconsin fishes. I. The 1944 survey. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 37, 157–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischthal, J. H. (1950). Parasites of northwest Wisconsin fishes. II. The 1945 survey. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 49, 87–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischthal, J. H. (1952). Parasites of northwest Wisconsin in fishes. III. The 1946 survey. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 41, 17–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freze, V. I. (1965). [Proteocephalata in fish, amphibians and reptiles]. Essentials of Cestodology. Vol. V. Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 538 pp. (In Russian; English translation, Israel Program of Scientific Translation, 1969, Cat. No. 1853, 597 pp.).

  • Froese, R., & Pauly, Pauly. (Eds.) (2020). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org, version 02/2017. Accessed 20 April 2020.

  • Haderlie, E. C. (1953). Parasites of the fresh-water fishes of northern California. University of California Publications in Zoology, 56, 303–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanzelová, V., & Scholz, T. (1999). Species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of coregonid and salmonid fishes from North America: taxonomic reappraisal. Journal of Parasitology, 85, 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, G. L. (1999). Parasites of North American Freshwater Fishes (2nd ed., p. 539). Ithaca, New York: Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, H. L., Jr., & Hagstrom, N. T. (1981). Comparison of four North Dakota impoundments and factors affecting the development of impoundment parasitofauna. Prairie Naturalist, 13, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G. W. (1929). Life-history studies on Proteocephalus pinguis La Rue. Parasitology, 21, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hypša, V., Škeříková, A., & Scholz, T. (2005). Multigene analysis and secondary structure characters in a reconstruction of phylogeny, evolution and host-parasite relationship of the order Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda). Parasitology, 130, 359–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jarecka, L. (1960). Life cycles of tapeworms from lakes Goldapiwo and Mamry Polnoczne. Acta Parasitologica Polonica, 8, 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchta, R., Řehulková, E., Francová, K., Scholz, T., & Šimková, A. (2020). What do we know about parasites of cypriniform fishes? Diversity of monogeneans and tapeworms across two continents. International Journal for Parasitology, 50, 771–786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La Rue, G. R. (1911). A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 38, 473–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rue, G. R. (1914). A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Illinois Biological Monographs, 1(1–2), 3–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, J. (1888). Parasites of the pickerel. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 40, 169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidy, J. (1891). Notices of Entozoa. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, 42, 410–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, E. (1889). Notes on Entozoa of marine fishes of New England, with descriptions of several new species. United States Commision of Fish and Fisheries. Part XIV. Report of the Commissioner for 1886, 14, 453– 511.

  • Marcogliese, D. J., & Scholz, T. (1999). Recent visitations by eels to Sable Island, Canada, confirmed by parasites. Journal of Fish Biology, 54, 685–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, L., & Arthur, J. R. (1979). Synopsis of the Parasites of Fishes of Canada. Bulletin of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 199, 269 pp.

  • Mayes, M. A. (1976). Proteocephalus buplanensis sp. n. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) from the creek chub, Semotilus atromaculatus (Mitchill), in Nebraska. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 43, 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, F. (1979). Occurrence of the endoparasitic helminths in pike (Esox lucius L) from the Mácha Lake fishpond system. Věstník Československé společnosti zoologické, 43, 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpoame, M., & Landers, E. J. (1981). Ophiotaenia critica (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of the Colorado River squawfish. Great Basin Naturalist, Provo, 41, 445–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oros, M., Choudhury, A., & Scholz, T. (2017). A common Eurasian fish tapeworm, Caryophyllaeides fennica (Cestoda) in western North America: further evidence of ‘amphi-Pacific’ vicariance in freshwater fish parasites. Journal of Parasitology, 103, 486–496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. D. (1970). How to Know the Tapeworms (p. 266). Dubuque, Iowa: William C. Brown Company Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, G. D. (1986). CRC Handbook of Tapeworm Identification (p. 675). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T. (1993). Development of Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch, 1786) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) in the intermediate host under experimental conditions. Journal of Helminthology, 67, 316–324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T., Choudhury, A., & Nelson, P. A. (2020). The Proteocephalus species-aggregate (Cestoda) in sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) of the Nearctic Region (North America), including description of a new species from brook stickleback. Culaea inconstans. Folia Parasitologica, 67, 021.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T., Choudhury, A., Uhrová, L., & Brabec, J. (2019). The Proteocephalus species-aggregate in freshwater centrarchid and percid fishes of the Nearctic region (North America). Journal of Parasitology, 105, 798–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T., & Hanzelová, V. (1998). Tapeworms of the genus Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of fishes in Europe. Studie AV ČR, No. 2/98, Academia, Praha, 119 pp.

  • Scholz, T., & Hanzelová, V. (1999). Species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) from cyprinid fishes in North America. Journal of Parasitology, 85, 150–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T., Hanzelová, V., Škeříková, A., Shimazu, T., & Rolbiecki, L. (2007). An annotated list of species of the Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 aggregate sensu de Chambrier et al. (2004) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), parasites of freshwater fishes in the Palaearctic Region, their phylogenetic relationships and key to identification. Systematic Parasitology, 67, 139–156.

  • Scholz, T., Marcogliese, D. J., Bourque, J.-F., Škeříková, A., & Dodson, J. J. (2004). Occurrence of Proteocephalus tetrastomus (Rudolphi, 1810) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) in larval rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in North America: Identification of an unusual pathogen confirmed. Journal of Parasitology, 90, 425–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, T., Špakulová, M., Šnábel, V., Králová, I., & Hanzelová, V. (1997). A multidisciplinary approach to the systematics of Proteocephalus macrocephalus (Creplin, 1825) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae). Systematic Parasitology, 37, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazu, T. (1990). Some species of the genus Proteocephalus (Cestoidea: Proteocephalidae) from Japanese freshwater fishes, with a description of a new species. Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 39, 612–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Škeříková, A., Hypša, V., & Scholz, T. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis of European species of Proteocephalus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea): compatibility of molecular and morphological data, and parasite-host coevolution. International Journal for Parasitology, 31, 1121–1128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sysoev, A. V. (1983). The composition of intermediate hosts of Proteocephalus torulosus (Batsch) (Cestoda: Proteocepha1idae) and the dynamics of invasion of Copepoda with this parasite under conditions in Karelia. Helminthologia, 20, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, O. (1917). Über den Entwicklungsgang und Bau einer Fischtaenie (Ichthyotaenia torulosus Batsch). Jena Zeitschrift für Naturwissenschaft, 55, 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, F. H., & Hill, L. G. (1968). Proteocephalus chologasteri sp. n. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) from the spring cavefish Chologaster agassizi Putman, 1782 (Pisces: Amblyopsidae) of Kentucky. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 35, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, F. H., & Zober, S. J. (1978). Proteocephalus poulsoni n. sp. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) from the northern cavefish Amblyopsis spelaea DeKay (Pisces: Amblyopsidae) of Kentucky. Folia Parasitologica, 25, 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemse, J. J. (1967). The host-parasite relation between fresh-water fishes and tapeworms of the genus Proteocephalus. Archives Neerlandaise de Zoologie, 17, 289–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemse, J. J. (1969). The genus Proteocephalus in the Netherlands. Journal of Helminthology, 43, 207–222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H., & Jones, A. (1994). Parasitic worms of fish (p. 593). London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zehnder, M. P., & Mariaux, J. (1999). Molecular systematic analysis of the order Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda) based on mitochondrial and nuclear rDNA sequences. International Journal for Parasitology, 29, 1841–1852.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful suggestions. This study was supported by the Fulbright Commission (Senior Fellowship to TS in 2017), Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (project No. LTAUSA18010) and the Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre (institutional support RVO 60077344). Technical assistance of Martina Borovková and Blanka Škoríková of the Institute of Parasitology, BC CAS, České Budějovice is much appreciated. Thanks are also due to Anna Phillips and staff of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian, Washington, D.C., and to Scott Gardner and Skip Sterner, H. W. Manter Laboratory, Lincoln, Nebraska, for enabling TS to study type and voucher specimens of North American species of Proteocephalus. TS and AC thank Chris McAllister, Eastern Oklahoma State College, U.S.A. for organising and facilitating collections in Oklahoma, and Patrick Nelson for donating his slides of P. buplanensis for this study. AC thanks Patrick Nelson, North South Consultants and Bill Franzin, DFO Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Canada, for help with sampling creek chub in Manitoba, and Richard Sanderson, Stantec, Green Bay – De Pere, U.S.A. and Scott Hansen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for northern pike samples from Wisconsin, U.S.A. AC also acknowledges funding and other support from St. Norbert College, including Faculty Development grants, and FR acknowledges funding support from the State University of New York College at Oneonta Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Scholz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional, national and international guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholz, T., Choudhury, A. & Reyda, F. The Proteocephalus species-aggregate (Cestoda) in cyprinoids, pike, eel, smelt and cavefish of the Nearctic region (North America): diversity, host associations and distribution. Syst Parasitol 98, 255–275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-021-09975-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11230-021-09975-3

Navigation