Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis of monozoic fish tapeworms Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) and recently described Caryophyllaeus chondrostomi Barčák, Oros, Hanzelová, Scholz, 2017, using microsatellite markers

  • Fish Parasitology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The monozoic tapeworm Caryophyllaeus laticeps has been characterized by five markedly different morphotypes largely corresponding to different fish hosts. Recently, the most distinct morphotype 4 from the common nase Chondrostoma nasus was studied in more details resulting in description of a new species Caryophyllaeus chondrostomi. The molecular study based on mitochondrial cox1 and ribosomal lsrDNA did not reveal any interspecific differences between C. laticeps and C. chondrostomi and did not provide any molecular support for recognition of these two species. In the current study, six polymorphic microsatellite markers were applied in order to detect molecular differences between the two species and to provide molecular evidence of validity of C. chondrostomi. While all six microsatellite loci were amplified in different geographic populations of C. laticeps, only two of them provided the amplification product in C. chondrostomi. Results on the Bayesian analysis assigned C. chondrostomi and all geographic populations of C. laticeps to distinct clusters. Neither any close relationships among C. laticeps populations nor specific position of C. chondrostomi were revealed. Contrary, the results of the principal coordinate analysis revealed striking genetic separation of C. chondrostomi with no overlaps with any of the C. laticeps population or morphotype. Caryophyllaeus chondrostomi very probably underwent morphological divergence as a result of ongoing speciation, but this process has not yet been accompanied by sufficient genetic divergence. In this particular case, microsatellites were proved to be better molecular discriminative markers than rDNA and mtDNA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Vladimíra Hanzelová a Dr. Mikuláš Oros (Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Košice, Slovakia) and Prof. Tomáš Scholz (Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic) for providing parasitic material. Access to computing and storage facilities owned by parties and projects contributing to the National Grid Infrastructure MetaCentrum provided under the programme “Projects of Large Research, Development, and Innovations Infrastructures” (CESNET LM2015042) is greatly appreciated.

Funding

The work was financially supported by the Slovak Grant Agency VEGA no. 2/0134/17 and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract APVV-0653-11.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IKH coordinated and designed the work; EB, IKH and AO performed all molecular analyses; EB and IKH wrote the manuscript; LJ, PM and JŠ performed all statistical analyses, descriptive statistics, Fst statistics, Bayesian analysis and principal coordinate analysis and provided interpretation of statistical outputs; GM was responsible for fragment analysis and evaluation of microsatellite data. All authors have read and improved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivica Králová-Hromadová.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Section Editor: Federica Marcer

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazsalovicsová, E., Králová-Hromadová, I., Juhásová, L. et al. Comparative analysis of monozoic fish tapeworms Caryophyllaeus laticeps (Pallas, 1781) and recently described Caryophyllaeus chondrostomi Barčák, Oros, Hanzelová, Scholz, 2017, using microsatellite markers. Parasitol Res 119, 3995–4004 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06898-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06898-8

Keywords

Navigation