Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Two faces of the same coin? A comparative, global approach to corruption and socioeconomic development

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigates the economic, social and political dimensions of development worldwide focusing on the relationship between perceived corruption and income levels, human development, government effectiveness and quality of the political system. The empirical results of this study reveal that these aspects are partly correlated, and feedback relationships are important when assessing socioeconomic development in a comparative perspective. Specific combinations of these factors characterize stable clusters of countries with distinctive economic performances. Effective developmental strategies require measures aimed at boosting income, reducing corruption and stimulating human development and government effectiveness. Empirical results of our analysis also suggest that these strategies are sustainable in the long-run only when associated with institutional transformations, enhancing governance quality. With unstable democracy and ineffective government, socioeconomic development cannot be effectively achieved and maintained on a long-run basis, even under increasing levels of income and wealth. With corruption, wealth is a necessary but not sufficient condition for socioeconomic development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aidt, T.S.: Corruption, institutions, and economic development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 25, 271–291 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, I.: Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues. Working paper 99:7. Chr. Mickelsen Institute, Bergen (1999)

  • Ceccarelli, T., Bajocco, S., Perini, L., Salvati, L.: Urbanisation and land take of high quality agricultural soils—exploring long-term land use changes and land capability in Northern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. 8(1), 181–192 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciommi, M., Gigliarano, C., Emili, A., Taralli, S., Chelli, F.M.: A new class of composite indicators for measuring well-being at the local level: an application to the Equitable and Sustainable Well-being (BES) of the Italian Provinces. Ecol. Ind. 76, 281–296 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vaal, A., Ebben, W.: Institutions and the relations between corruption and economic growth. Rev. Dev. Econ. 15(1), 108–123 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvernoy, I., Zambon, I., Sateriano, A., Salvati, L.: Pictures from the other side of the fringe: urban growth and peri-urban agriculture in a post-industrial city (Toulouse, France). J. Rural Stud. 57, 25–35 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House: Freedom in the World 2010. Global Erosion and Freedom, New York, USA (2010)

  • Freedom House: Freedom in the World 2013. Democratic Breakthroughs in the Balance, New York, USA (2013)

  • Freudenberg, M.: Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment. OECD, Paris (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S.P.: Political Order in Changing Societies. Yale University Press, New Haven (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: The definitions debate: old conflicts in new guises. In: Jain, A.K. (ed.) The Political Economy of Corruption, pp. 11–31. Routledge, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M.: Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008. Policy research working paper no. 4978. World Bank (2009)

  • Lalountas, D.A., Manolas, G.A., Vavouras, I.S.: Corruption, globalization and development: how are these three phenomena related? J. Policy Model. 33, 636–648 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J.G.: Causes and consequences of corruption: what do we know from a cross-section of countries? In: Rose-Ackerman, S. (ed.) International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, pp. 3–51. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J.G.: The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., Loayza, N.V., Soares, R.R.: Accountability and corruption: political institutions matter. Econ. Polit. 17(1), 1–35 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N.: Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. Am. Behav. Sci. 8, 8–14 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Vazquez, J., Arze-del-Granado, J., Boex, J.: Fighting Corruption in the Public Sector, Contributions to economic analysis, vol. 284. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD: Ethics in the Public Service: Current Issues and Practice. Public management occasional papers no. 14, Paris (1996)

  • Paldam, M.: The cross-country pattern of corruption. Economics, culture and the seesaw dynamics. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 18, 215–240 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pili, S., Grigoriadis, E., Carlucci, M., Clemente, M., Salvati, L.: Towards sustainable growth? A multi-criteria assessment of (changing) urban forms. Ecol. Ind. 76, 71–80 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rontos, K., Salvati, L., Vavouras, I.: Socioeconomic and political dimensions of development worldwide. Sociol. Criminol. 1(1), 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rontos, K., Grigoriadis, S., Sateriano, A., Syrmali, M., Vavouras, I., Salvati, L.: Lost in protest, found in segregation: divided cities in the light of the 2015 ‘Oki’ referendum in Greece. City Cult. Soc. 7(3), 139–148 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press, New York (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati, L., Zitti, M.: Substitutability and equal weighting of environmental indicators: a proposal to estimate the importance of the different components of a composite index. Ecol. Econ. 68(4), 1093–1099 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati, L., Gargiulo, V., Rontos, K., Sabbi, A.: Latent exurban development: city expansion along the rural-to-urban gradient in growing and declining regions of southern Europe. Urban Geogr. 34(3), 376–394 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sioussiouras, P., Vavouras, I.: Political rights, development and corruption in the Balkan and Arab Mediterranean countries. Mediterr. Q. 23, 89–103 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, H.-E.: A convergence approach to the analysis of political corruption: a cross-national study. Crime Law Soc. Change 38, 137–160 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V.: Corruption Around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures. IMF working paper, no. 63 (1998)

  • Tanzi, V.: Policies, Institutions and the Dark Side of Economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International: Poverty and Corruption. Working paper no. 2/2008 (2008)

  • Transparency International: Corruption Perceptions Index (2010)

  • Transparency International: Frequently Asked Questions About Corruption. http://www.transparency.org/news_room/faq/corruption_faq#faqcorr1 (2011). Accessed July 2018

  • Treisman, D.: The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J. Public Econ. 76, 399–457 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP: Arab Human Development Report. United Nations Development Programme, New Yourk, USA (2002)

  • UNDP: A User’s Guide to Measuring Corruption. United Nations Development Programme, New Yourk, USA (2008)

  • UNDP: Human Development Report 2009: Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. Palgrave, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M.E.: What does corruption mean in a democracy? Am. J. Polit. Sci. 48(2), 328–343 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: World Development Report 1997. Oxford University Press, Washington (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: World Development Indicators Database, 15 December. World Bank, Washington, USA (2010a)

  • World Bank: The Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2009 Update. Aggregate Indicators of Governance 1996–2009. www.govindicators.org (2010b). Accessed July 2018

  • Zhang, Y., Cao, L., Vaughn, M.S.: Social support and corruption: structural determinants of corruption in the world. Aust. N. Z. J. Criminol. 42, 204–217 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Salvati.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Countries’ scores of a composite index of corruption corrected for the socioeconomic background conditions by computation methodology (countries are ordered by avg.rank rule; lowest scores indicate low corruption in a context of high development)

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 Frequency of countries’ rankings by decile and aggregation method

Appendix 3

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Quantile plots for the intercept and individual predictors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rontos, K., Vavouras, I., Ciommi, M.T. et al. Two faces of the same coin? A comparative, global approach to corruption and socioeconomic development. Qual Quant 53, 1875–1894 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00846-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00846-0

Keywords

Navigation