ANÝŽOVÁ, Petra. 2014. „Srovnatelnost Schwartzovy hodnotové škály v mezinárodních datech.“ Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 50(4): 547–580. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2014.50.4.108

ANÝŽOVÁ, Petra. 2015. Srovnatelnost postojových škál v komparativním výzkumu. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.

ASPAROUHOV, Tihomir a Bengt MUTHÉN. 2014. „Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment.“ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 21(4): 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.919210

ASPAROUHOV, Tihomir a Bengt MUTHÉN. 2010. Bayesian Analysis of Latent Variable Models Using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén. Technical report (www.statmodel.com). Los Angeles, CA.

BENÍTEZ, Isabel, José Luis PADILLA, Fons van de VIJVER a Amaya CUEVAS. 2018. „What Cognitive Interviews Tell Us about Bias in Cross-Cultural Research: An Illustration Using Quality-of-Life Items.“ Field Methods 30(4): 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X18783961

BJØRNSKOV, Christian. 2010. „How Comparable Are the Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data?“ Journal of Happiness Studies 11(1): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9121-6

BUJACZ, Aleksandra, Joar VITTERSØ, Veronika HUTA a Lukasz D. KACZMAREK. 2014. „Measuring Hedonia and Eudaimonia as Motives for Activities: Cross-National Investigation Through Traditional and Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.“ Frontiers in Psychology 5: Article 984. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00984

BYRNE, Barbara M. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Second Edition. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

BYRNE, Barbara M., Richard J. SHAVELSON a Bengt MUTHÉN. 1989. „Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance.“ Psychological Bulletin 105(3): 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456

CIECIUCH, Jan a Eldad DAVIDOV. 2012. „A Comparison of the Invariance Properties of the PVQ-40 and the PVQ-21 to Measure Human Values across German and Polish Samples.“ Survey Research Methods 6(1): 37–48.

CIECIUCH, Jan, Eldad DAVIDOV, René ALGESHEIMER a Peter SCHMIDT. 2018. „Testing for Approximate Measurement Invariance of Human Values in the European Social Survey.“ Sociological Methods & Research 47(4): 665–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117701478

CIECIUCH, Jan, Eldad DAVIDOV, Peter SCHMIDT, René ALGESHEIMER a Shalom H. SCHWARTZ. 2014. „Comparing Results of an Exact vs. an Approximate (Bayesian) Measurement Invariance Test: A Cross-Country Illustration with a Scale to Measure 19 Human Values.“ Frontiers in Psychology 5: Article 982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982

CUMMINS, Robert A., Richard ECKERSLEY, Julie PALLANT, Jackie van VUGT a RoseAnne MISAJON. 2003. „Developing a National Index of Subjective Wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index.“ Social Indicators Research 64(2): 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024704320683

DAVIDOV, Eldad, Jan CIECIUCH, Bart MEULEMAN, Peter SCHMIDT, René ALGESHEIMER a Mirjam HAUSHERR. 2015. „The Comparability of Measurements of Attitudes toward Immigration in the European Social Survey.“ Public Opinion Quarterly 79(S1): 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv008

DAVIDOV, Eldad, Bart MEULEMAN, Jan CIECIUCH, Peter SCHMIDT a Jaak BILLIET. 2014. „Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research.“ Annual Review of Sociology 40(1): 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137

DAVIDOV, Eldad, Jan CIECIUCH a Peter SCHMIDT. 2018. „The Cross-Country Measurement Comparability in the Immigration Module of the European Social Survey 2014–15.“ Survey Research Methods 12(1): 15–27.

DAVIDOV, Eldad, Peter SCHMIDT a Jaak BILLIET (eds.). 2011. Cross-cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882924

DEMARS, Christine. 2010. Item Response Theory. Oxford: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001

DIENER, Ed. 2009. The Science of Well-Being. The Collected Works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6

DIENER, Ed, Robert A. EMMONS, Randy J. LARSEN a Sharon GRIFFIN. 1985. „The Satisfaction With Life Scale.“ Journal of Personality Assessment 49(1): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

DIENER, Ed, Richard E. LUCAS a Shigehiro OISHI. 2018. „Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being.“ Collabra: Psychology 4(1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115

DIENER, Ed, Derrick WIRTZ, Robert BISWAS-DIENER, William TOV, Chu KIM-PRIETO, Dong-won CHOI a Shigehiro OISHI. 2009. „New Measures of Well-Being.“ Pp. 247–266 in Ed DIENER (ed.). Assessing Well-Being. The Collected Works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12

DIENER, Ed a Richard E. LUCAS. 1999. „Personality and Subjective Well-Being.“ Pp. 213–229 in Daniel KAHNEMAN, Ed DIENER a Norbert SCHWARZ (eds.). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.

EMBRETSON, Susan E. a Steven P. REISE. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

EMERSON, Scott D., Martin GUHN a Anne M. GADERMANN. 2017. „Measurement Invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: Reviewing Three Decades of Research.“ Quality of Life Research 26(9): 2251–2264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1552-2

FORS, Filip a Joakim KULIN. 2016. „Bringing Affect Back in: Measuring and Comparing Subjective Well-Being Across Countries.“ Social Indicators Research 127(1): 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0947-0

HUPPERT, Felicia A., Nic MARKS, Andrew CLARK, Johannes SIEGRIST, Alois STUTZER, Joar VITTERSØ a Morten WAHRENDORF. 2009. „Measuring Well-Being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-Being Module and Preliminary Findings.“ Social Indicators Research 91(3): 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9346-0

HUPPERT, Felicia A. a Timothy T. C. SO. 2013. „Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being.“ Social Indicators Research 110(3): 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7

CHEN, Fang Fang. 2007. „Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.“ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14(3): 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

JOVANOVIĆ, Veljko, Robert A. CUMMINS, Melissa WEINBERG, Ljiljana KALITERNA a Zvjezdana PRIZMIC-LARSEN. 2019. „Personal Wellbeing Index: A Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance Study Across Four Countries.“ Journal of Happiness Studies 20(3): 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9966-2

KAHNEMAN, Daniel, Ed DIENER a Norbert SCHWARZ (eds.). 1999. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Found.

KIM, Eun Sook, Chunhua CAO, Yan WANG a Diep T. NGUYEN. 2017. „Measurement Invariance Testing with Many Groups: A Comparison of Five Approaches.“ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 24(4): 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822

McGILLIVRAY, Mark a Matthew CLARKE. 2006. Understanding Human Well-being. Tokyo: UNU Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625600

MEITINGER, Katharina. 2017. „Necessary but Insufficient.“ Public Opinion Quarterly 81(2): 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx009

MEREDITH, William. 1993. „Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance.“ Psychometrika 58(4): 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825

MEULEMAN, Bart, Eldad DAVIDOV a Jaak BILLIET. 2009. „Changing Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe, 2002–2007: A Dynamic Group Conflict Theory Approach.“ Social Science Research 38 (2): 352–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.09.006

MÎNDRILĂ, Diana. 2010. „Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) Estimation Procedures: A Comparison of Estimation Bias with Ordinal and Multivariate Non-Normal Data.“ International Journal of Digital Society 1(1): 60–66. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2010.0010

MONROE, Scott a Li CAI. 2015. „Evaluationg Structural Equation Models for Categorical Outcomes: A New Test Statistic and a Practical Challenge of Interpretation.“ Multivariate Behavioral Research 50(6): 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398

MUTHÉN, Bengt a Tihomir ASPAROUHOV. 2012. „Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: A More Flexible Representation of Substantive Theory.“ Psychological Methods 17(3): 313–335.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802

MUTHÉN, Bengt a Tihomir ASPAROUHOV. 2013. „BSEM Measurement Invariance Analysis.“ Mplus Web Notes 17: 1–48.

MUTHÉN, K. Linda a Bengt O. MUTHÉN. 1998–2017. Mplus User’s Guide (8.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

MUTHÉN, Bengt O. 1999. „Fit Indices for Categorical Outcumes.“ Mplus Discussion. 2. listopadu. Cit. 16. srpna 2020 (http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/23/26.html).

NAVRUZ, Bilgin. 2016. „The Behaviors of Robust Weighted Least Squares Estimation Techniques for Categorical/Ordinal Data in Multilevel CFA Models.“ Doctoral dissertation. Texas A & M University.

OECD. 2013. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-Being. OECD.

POKROPEK, Artur, Eldad DAVIDOV a Peter SCHMIDT. 2019. „A Monte Carlo Simulation Study to Assess the Appropriateness of Traditional and Newer Approaches to Test for Measurement Invariance.“ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 26(5): 724–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1561293

POKROPEK, Artur, Peter SCHMIDT a Eldad DAVIDOV. 2020. „Choosing Priors in Bayesian Measurement Invariance Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.“ Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal online: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1703708

RAUDENSKÁ, Petra. 2020. „The Cross-Country and Cross-Time Measurement Invariance of Positive and Negative Affect Scales: Evidence from European Social Survey.“ Social Science Research 86: 102369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102369

REEVE, Bryce B. a Peter FAYERS. (2005). „Applying Item Response Theory Modelling for Evaluating Questionnaire Item and Scale Properties.“ Pp. 55–73 in Peter FAYERS a Ron HAYS (eds.). Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

RUTKOWSKI, Leslie a Dubravka SVETINA. 2014. „Assessing the Hypothesis of Measurement Invariance in the Context of Large-Scale International Surveys.“ Educational and Psychological Measurement 74(1): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257

RUTKOWSKI, Leslie a Dubravka SVETINA. 2017. „Measurement Invariance in International Surveys: Categorical Indicators and Fit Measure Performance.“ Applied Measurement in Education 30(1): 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1243540

RYAN, Richard M. a Edward L. DECI. 2001. „On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being.“ Annual Review of Psychology 52(1): 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

SEDDIG, Daniel a Heinz LEITGÖB. 2018. „Approximate Measurement Invariance and Longitudinal Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Concept and Application with Panel Data.“ Survey Research Methods 12(1): 29–41.

STEENKAMP, Jan‐Benedict E. M. a Hans BAUMGARTNER. 1998. „Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross‐National Consumer Research.“ Journal of Consumer Research 25(1): 78–107. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528

TAY, Louis, Quiming HUANG a Jeroen K. VERMUNT. 2016. „Item Response Theory With Covariates (IRT-C): Assessing Item Recovery and Differential Item Functioning for the Three-Parameter Logistic Model.“ Educational and Psychological Measurement 76(1): 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415579488

TAY, Louis, Jeroen K. VERMUNT a Chun WANG. 2013. „Assessing the Item Response Theory With Covariate (IRT-C) Procedure for Ascertaining Differential Item Functioning.“ International Journal of Testing 13(3): 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2012.692415

TERESI, Jeanne A. 2006. „Different Approaches to Differential Item Functioning in Health Applications: Advantages, Disadvantages and Some Neglected Topics.“ Medical Care 44(11): 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245142.74628.ab

VAN DE SCHOOT, Rens, Anouck KLUYTMANS, Lars TUMMERS, Peter LUGTIG, Joop HOX a Bengt MUTHÉN. 2013. „Facing Off with Scylla and Charybdis: A Comparison of Scalar, Partial, and the Novel Possibility of Approximate Measurement Invariance.“ Frontiers in Psychology 4: Article 770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770

VANDENBERG, Robert J. a Charles E. LANCE. 2000. „A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research.“ Organizational Research Methods 3(1): 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

WATERMAN, Alan S. 1993. „Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment.“ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(4): 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678

WHO. 1998. Wellbeing Measures in Primary Health Care/The Depcare Project. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen.

XIA, Yan. 2016. Investigating the Chi-Square-Based Model-Fit Indexes for WLSMV and ULSMV Estimators. Doctoral disseration. Florida State University.

ZERCHER, Florian, Peter SCHMIDT, Jan CIECIUCH a Eldad DAVIDOV. 2015. „The Comparability of the Universalism Value Over Time and Across Countries in the European Social Survey: Exact Vs. Approximate Measurement Invariance.“ Frontiers in Psychology 6: Article 733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00733

ŻEMOJTEL-PIOTROWSKA, Magdalena et al. 2017. „Measurement Invariance of Personal Well-Being Index (PWI-8) Across 26 Countries.“ Journal of Happiness Studies 18(6): 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9795-0