Next Article in Journal
Pathophysiology, Therapeutic Targets, and Future Therapeutic Alternatives in COPD: Focus on the Importance of the Cholinergic System
Next Article in Special Issue
9-O Acetylated Gangliosides in Health and Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Solid-State Preparation and Characterization of 2-Hydroxypropylcyclodextrins-Iodine Complexes as Stable Iodophors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Associations between Dietary Intake, Blood Levels of Omega-3 and Omega-6 Fatty Acids and Reading Abilities in Children
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Triacylglycerol Estolide Isomers Using High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Nanoelectrospray Ionization

1
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Flemingovo Náměstí 542/2, 166 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 2030/8, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic
3
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 2155/3, 182 23 Prague 8, Czech Republic
4
School of Chemistry and Physics and the Central Analytical Research Facility, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2023, 13(3), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030475
Submission received: 31 January 2023 / Revised: 27 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Lipids: Sources, Synthesis, and Biological Roles)

Abstract

:
Triacylglycerol estolides (TG-EST) are biologically active lipids extensively studied for their anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic properties. In this work, eight standards of TG-EST were synthesized and systematically investigated by nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Mass spectra of synthetic TG-EST were studied with the purpose of enabling the unambiguous identification of these lipids in biological samples. TG-EST glycerol sn-regioisomers and isomers with the fatty acid ester of hydroxy fatty acid (FAHFA) subunit branched in the ω-, α-, or 10-position were used. Ammonium, lithium, and sodium adducts of TG-EST formed by nanoelectrospray ionization were subjected to collision-induced dissociation (CID) and higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD). Product ion spectra allowed for identification of fatty acid (FA) and FAHFA subunits originally linked to the glycerol backbone and distinguished the α-branching site of the FAHFA from other estolide-branching isomers. The ω- and 10-branching sites were determined by combining CID with ozone-induced dissociation (OzID). Lithium adducts provided the most informative product ions, enabling characterization of FA, hydroxy fatty acid (HFA), and FAHFA subunits. Glycerol sn-regioisomers were distinguished based on the relative abundance of product ions and unambiguously identified using CID/OzID of lithium and sodium adducts.

1. Introduction

Triacylglycerol estolides (TG-ESTs) are a minor class of lipids consisting of a glycerol backbone to which a combination of fatty acids (FA) and estolides is esterified (also reported as fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acid, FAHFA, and (O-acyl)-hydroxy fatty acid [1,2,3]) as a structural subunit [4]. TG-ESTs are biologically active molecules known from mammals [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], plants [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], and fungi [29,33,39,40,41]. In mammalian TG-ESTs, a hydroxy fatty acid (HFA) is usually esterified with a non-hydroxy FA (“capped” estolide), while in plants and fungi, another HFA may be attached (“uncapped” estolide). TG-ESTs serve as a reservoir of biologically active FAHFAs that exhibit various biological activities. FAHFAs are released from TG-ESTs by the action of lipases which may exhibit hydrolytic specificity regarding the estolide-branching site. A subgroup of FAHFAs with specific biological functions can thus be mobilized [7]. Understanding TG-EST and FAHFA metabolism can help to establish new strategies for treating obesity, diabetes, and other diseases [6,42].
The structural variability of TG-EST stems from numerous FA and HFA that can be combined. There are many TG-EST positional isomers, including glycerol sn-regioisomers that differ by the arrangement of acyl chains on the glycerol backbone and estolide-branching regioisomers with different positions of the estolide ester bond within the FAHFA subunit [6,7]. The structural variability of TG-EST is further extended by stereoisomers existing due to the chirality of the estolide-branching carbon [43]. The estolide regioisomers branched in the ω-position (terminal carbon atom of the HFA chain) are found in some plants [12,14,19,20,21,24,31]. The FAHFA subunit is, however, more often branched on an “inner” carbon of the HFA chain; such TG-ESTs exist in plants, fungi, and mammals [6,7,8,9,11,15,16,17,18,22,25,26,27,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,39,40,41]. To our knowledge, TG-ESTs with the FAHFA branched in the α-position (carbon number 2 of HFA) have not been reported yet. Their structural unit, α-FAHFA, was recently detected in vernix caseosa, a biofilm that covers the skin of newborn babies [3]. Additionally, the α-FAHFA is a major motif in estolides attached to sugar backbones as in lipid A within Escherichia coli [44]. Due to the metabolic connections between FAHFAs and TG-ESTs [6,7,42], the existence of TG-ESTs with α-branched FAHFA subunits is likely.
After hydrolysis and derivatization, TG-EST can be analyzed by gas chromatography [12,13,14,15,16,18,19,24,39,40]. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is preferred nowadays because it separates intact TG-EST molecules, preserving key structural information on ester bond linkages. Reversed-phase HPLC makes it possible to separate TG-EST isomers according to the number of carbon atoms, carbon–carbon double bonds, and the estolide-branching site in the FAHFA subunit [7]. HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS) offers excellent sensitivity and selectivity for TG-EST in biological samples [6,7,8,9,10,11,25]. Electrospray ionization (ESI) of this lipid class typically generates ammonium [M + NH4]+, sodium [M + Na]+, or lithium [M + Li]+ molecular adducts depending on conditions, with subsequent ion activation by collision-induced dissociation (CID) or higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) generating structurally informative product ions [6,7,8,9,10,25,26,27,28,35,37]. These spectra usually show product ions identifying the FA(s) linked to the glycerol backbone and the composition of the FAHFA subunit(s) [6,7,25,26,27]. Lithium adducts provide somewhat more informative spectra, with product ion peaks useful for deducing the sub-structure of FAHFA subunits and, in some cases, differentiating between glycerol sn-regioisomers [26,28]. The structure of lipid ions can also be probed by alternative ion activation methods, such as ozone-induced dissociation (OzID) [45,46]. OzID makes it possible to determine the carbon–carbon double bond position within the acyl chain [47,48], the position of estolide-branching [49], and the glycerol sn-position of the acyl chain [48,50,51]. Although some information on TG-EST fragmentation can be found in the literature [6,7,25,26,27], a systematic study of the fragmentation behavior of these lipids is not available. In the absence of these data, identifying TG-EST isomers in biological samples is challenging, and leads to a greater reliance on structural inferences from HPLC retention data [6,7,8,9,11].
In this study, we synthesized eight TG-EST standards to study the mass spectra of estolide-branching regioisomers and glycerol sn-regioisomers. Ammonium, lithium, and sodium adducts generated by nanoelectrospray ionization were fragmented using CID and HCD. Structurally significant ions were identified, and some unimolecular dissociation mechanisms are suggested and further investigated by multistage mass spectrometry, including with OzID.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Solvents and Additives

Acetonitrile (LC/MS grade) and propan-2-ol (LC/MS grade) were purchased from Biosolve BV (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). Methyl t-butyl ether (>99.8%), methanol (99.9%), ammonium formate (>99.0%), lithium formate monohydrate (98%), and sodium formate (>99.0%,) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Luis, MO, USA). Chloroform (99.8%) stabilized by ~1% ethanol from Penta (Chrudim, Czech Republic) was purified by distillation.

2.2. TG-EST Standards

The structures of eight TG-EST standards investigated in this work are shown in Figure 1.
The standards each had one FAHFA subunit in either the sn-1/3 (Standards TG-EST 17) or the sn-2 position (Standard TG-EST 8). The FAHFA subunits contained the estolide ester bond in positions-2 (α; Standards TG-EST 2, and 5), -10 (Standard TG-EST 3), or at the HFA chain terminus (ω; Standards TG-EST 1, 4, 6, 7, and 8). The standards were synthesized by Steglich esterification mediated by N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) [53]. 10-Hydroxyhexadecanoate, the key compound for preparation of TG-EST 3, was prepared according to our previous work [54]. Details regarding the synthesis, together with spectral data of intermediates and final products, are provided in Supplementary Materials (Schemes S1–S8 and Figures S1–S75).
For CID and HCD mass spectrometry experiments, the TG-EST standards were dissolved in a mixture of chloroform: propan-2-ol: acetonitrile: aqueous salt solution (0.5:0.05:0.80:0.10, by vol.) at a concentration of 10 µg mL−1. The aqueous solutions of the salts (ammonium, lithium, or sodium formate) were prepared at a concentration of 1.0 mmol L−1.
For OzID experiments, standards of TG-EST were dissolved in a mixture of chloroform: methyl t-butyl ether: methanol (0.05:0.5:0.5, by vol.) at a concentration of 100 µg mL−1. The TG-EST sample was further diluted 1:1 (v/v) in methanolic salt solution (Li+ or Na+; 2.5 mmol L−1).

2.3. Mass Spectrometry

For CID and HCD workflows, nanoESI-MSn experiments were performed on the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a robotic chip-based nanoESI apparatus TriVersa NanoMate (Advion, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). Data were recorded and interpreted manually using Xcalibur 4.1.50 software (Thermo). The TriVersa NanoMate, controlled by Chipsoft 8.3.1 software, was operated with an ionization spray voltage of 1800 V and nitrogen delivery gas at 0.5 psi. TG-EST solutions were loaded into 96-well plates, and the sample aliquots (5–15 μL) were aspirated and infused into the mass spectrometer. The Orbitrap mass analyzer was operated at a resolution of 120,000 FWHM, and m/z values were acquired with an accuracy of less than 3.0 ppm.
[M + NH4]+, [M + Li]+, and [M + Na]+ ions were fragmented in MS2 and MS3 using CID and HCD. Helium and nitrogen served as collision gases for CID and HCD, respectively. Values of normalized collision energies (NCEs) are shown in spectra and are a unitless parameter (as NCE automatically compensates for the mass dependence on collision energy). The precursor isolation window was 1.0–1.5 mass units. The mass spectra were recorded in the m/z range of 200−1200 for full MS and MS2, and a m/z range of 150–900 for MS3 was used. The energy-resolved dissociation curves (Supplementary Materials, Figures S76–S87) were calculated from spectra acquired by introducing incremental changes to NCE values. The relative ion abundance values were averaged from 20–40 scans.
For MS3 CID/OzID and MS4 CID/CID/OzID sequential workflows, nanoESI-MSn experiments were performed on the LTQ Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo) modified for OzID experiments [55]. An ozone generator (Titan30 UHC; Absolute Ozone, Edmonton, AB, Canada) was used for the external production of ozone (ca. 17% in oxygen), which was introduced into the ion-trap region of the instrument. The TriVersa NanoMate was used in the same way as in the case of CID and HCD with identical parameters (ionization spray voltage, nitrogen delivery, resolution, precursor window, and accuracy). Lithiated estolide-branching isomers and lithiated/sodiated glycerol sn-regioisomers were activated by CID (NCE 40%). Depending on the sequential workflow, the re-isolated MS2 or MS3 CID product ions reacted with ozone for 1.0 s at NCE of 0–1%.

3. Results

3.1. Mass Spectra of ω-, 10-, and α-Estolide-Branching Regioisomers

The FAHFA subunit of TG-EST consists of an HFA esterified (via its hydroxy group) to a second FA. The position of the hydroxy group can range from second (α-)carbon (adjacent to the carboxylic acid moiety) to the final (ω-)carbon on the chain terminus. We investigated ω-, 10-, and α-estolide-branching regioisomers to establish whether their mass spectra provided information characteristic of the estolide ester bond position. When subjected to positive ion electrospray ionization from solutions containing ammonium, lithium, and sodium cations, TG-EST produced abundant [M + NH4]+, [M + Li]+, and [M + Na]+ adducts, respectively.

3.1.1. Fragmentation of Ammonium Adducts

Ammonium formate and acetate are relatively volatile salts that are widely used in ESI and HPLC/MS. Ammonium adducts have been broadly adopted for the analysis neutral lipids, e.g., TGs [56,57], and they have also been utilized in the structural analysis of TG-ESTs [6,7,8,9,10,11,25,37]. Activation of these adducts typically leads to the neutral loss of ammonia, yielding product ions arising from proton transfer to the neutral lipid.
MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST ammonium adducts yielded fragments consistent with the neutral loss of ammonia combined with FA and FAHFA. As illustrated in Figure 2, upon activation, ammonium adducts TG-EST 13 (m/z 1100.98; C69H130O8N+) were determined to eliminate ammonia and palmitoleic acid (m/z 829.73; C53H97O6+) and ammonia and the FAHFA subunit, i.e., ester of oleic and hydroxy palmitic acid (m/z 547.47; C35H63O4+). The elimination of oleic acid bound in the FAHFA subunit proceeded only for TG-EST 3 (m/z 801.70; C51H93O6+). In this isomer (10-), eliminations of FA linked to glycerol and bound in the FAHFA moiety were similarly efficient. Neutral loss of FAs from FAHFA moiety was documented previously for TG-EST with estolide-branching site on “inner” carbons of HFA chain [6,7].
In addition to neutral loss peaks, FAHFA acylium ion (m/z 519.48; C34H63O3+) was present at low abundance in TG EST 1 and TG-EST 2. In the α-isomer (TG-EST 2), m/z 491.48 (C33H63O2+) was probably formed from [M + H]+ (m/z 1083.95; C69H127O8+) by a cleavage of C1-C2 bond in HFA weakened by the esterified α-OH group. Oleic acid acylium ion (m/z 265.25; C18H33O+) likely originated from this ion after proton rearrangement, analogously to forming FA acylium ions from TGs [58] (p. 109). The abundant acylium ion made it possible to identify FA in the FAHFA subunit. As the acylium ions were formed only from the TG-EST 2 (Figure 2B) and TG-EST 5 (Figure S88B), they can be considered diagnostic ions for the α-estolide-branching regioisomers. Mass spectra MS2 HCD of ammonium adducts of TG-EST 48 are presented in Supplementary Materials (Figure S88).
The ion trap CID spectra contained fragments identical to HCD spectra, but the low mass cut-off in the ion trap prevented detection of product ions of m/z < 350 (Figure S89). Therefore, HCD was more useful for TG-EST structure elucidation than CID. Energy-resolved dissociation curves of TG-EST ammonium adducts helped us to determine the optimal value of NCE for MS2 experiments. As shown in Figures S76–S79, the optimum NCEs in CID were almost the same for TG-EST 13 (NCE 30–35). In HCD, the optimum NCE values ensuring the detection of all diagnostic product ions were dependent on the TG-EST structure. While TG-EST 1 required NCE values above 20, TG-EST 2 fragmented best at NCE around 15, and TG-EST 3 needed an NCE value set to approximately 10. This observation is consistent with differences in the energetics of competing dissociation pathways across the isomeric structures.
MS3 offered additional insight into the TG-EST structure. CID spectra of the first generator product ions at m/z 829.73 (Figure S90A–C) differed significantly for the investigated isomers. Under these conditions, all isomers eliminated the second palmitoleic acid (m/z 575.50; C37H67O4+) from the glycerol backbone and the oleic acid from the FAHFA subunit (m/z 547.47; C35H63O4+). Unlike the other isomers, the ω-isomer (TG-EST 1) provided a strong FAHFA acylium ion signal (m/z 519.48; C34H63O3+) along with its dehydration product ions (m/z 501.47; m/z 483.46). The spectrum of α-isomer (TG-EST 2) was characterized by the oleic acid acylium ion (m/z 265.25; C18H33O+) and neutral loss of palmitic acid ketene (m/z 593.51; C37H69O5+). MS3 of m/z 829.73 thus made it possible to distinguish the individual isomers. CID spectra of m/z 547.47 (Figure S90D–F) showed less significant differences in peak intensities, making these fragmentation patterns less likely to be useful for discriminating between isomers in a complex biological mixture. In theory, further information about the estolide structure could also be obtained by re-isolation and further dissociation of FAHFA acylium ion at m/z 519.48, but in practice, its abundance was too low to get measurable diagnostic product ion signals.
The MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST ammonium adducts made it possible to characterize FAHFA subunit and FAs linked to glycerol. FA bound in the FAHFA subunit was detectable as an acylium ion in α-isomer and as a neutral loss in the 10-isomer. Therefore, the spectra allowed us to distinguish estolide-branching isomers and characterize all four FA chains in TG-EST, except for ω-isomers, for which the spectra did not provide information about individual chains in the FAHFA moiety (see spectra of TG-EST 4 and TG-EST 6 in Figure S88A,C, respectively). Determining the estolide-branching position in MS2 was thus possible for α- and 10-isomers. MS3 allowed us to obtain additional structural information; characteristic fragments indicating α- and ω-isomers were identified.

3.1.2. Fragmentation of Lithium Adducts

Under CID and HCD conditions, lithium adducts of neutral lipids most often provide more structural information than the corresponding sodium or ammonium adducts due to the high oxygen affinity of the lithium [59,60,61]. Figure 3 shows MS2 HCD spectra of lithiated TG-EST 13 (m/z 1089.96; C69H126O8Li+). Some of the fragmentation pathways observed in these spectra resemble those observed for the ammonium adducts. Lithiated TG-EST eliminated palmitoleic acids linked to the glycerol backbone (m/z 835.74; C53H96O6Li+) and the FAHFA moiety both as the neutral acid (m/z 553.48; C35H62O4Li+) and its lithium salt (m/z 547.47; C35H63O4+). Eliminating oleic acid from the FAHFA subunit (m/z 807.70; C51H92O6Li+) occurred only from the 10-isomer (TG-EST 3), with an efficiency comparable to the neutral loss of glycerol-linked FA.
HCD of lithium adducts (Figure 3) also opened dissociation channels that were not observed for ammonium adducts. The FAHFA moiety provided an abundant lithiated fragment m/z 543.50 (C34H64O4Li+), which offered the possibility to characterize FAHFA subunit in the subsequent MS3 step (see below). Lithium adducts of TG-EST 1 (ω-) and 2 (α-) eliminated both glycerol-linked FAs (m/z 583.53; C37H68O4Li+) while this pathway was almost absent in the TG-EST 3 (10-isomer). These product ions likely arise following the elimination of the first palmitoleic acid by charge-remote fragmentation, as previously suggested for TGs [59] (see in Supplementary Materials, Figure S91). The acylium ion of palmitoleic acid originally bound to glycerol (m/z 237.22; C16H29O+) was detected as a small peak in all three TG-EST spectra. For α- and 10-isomers, lithiated palmitoleic acid (m/z 261.24; C16H30O2Li+) and lithiated oleic acid (m/z 289.27; C18H34O2Li+) ions were formed. The ion m/z 279.25 (C16H32O3Li+), corresponding to the lithium adduct of the HFA, was observed in the spectrum of α-isomer TG-EST 2 (Figure 3B) and TG-EST 5 (Figure S92B). This product ion was rationalized as resulting from the neutral loss of the ketene of oleic acid from m/z 543.50 that is the lithium adduct of FAHFA subunit. This proposal was confirmed by the explicit MS3 of m/z 543.50 shown in Figure 4B. This product ion was determined to be diagnostic of α-estolide-branching regioisomers as evidenced by the wider test-set of HCD spectra of TG-EST 48 lithium adducts that are presented in Figure S92.
The ion-trap CID mass spectra of lithium adduct ions yielded fragments identical to those of HCD, with the exception of the absence of low mass ions (Figure S93). The energy-resolved dissociation curves of lithiated TG-EST (Figures S80–S83) displayed an optimal NCE for MS2 HCD experiments of 33.
The MS3 experiments with lithiated FAHFA (m/z 543.50) were performed with the preceding ion trap-CID step providing a more abundant precursor ion than HCD. The MS3 (CID/CID) spectra of ω-, α-, and 10-isomers (TG-EST 13) are shown in Figure 4.
All the spectra provided lithiated oleic acid (m/z 289.27; C18H34O2Li+) and lithiated FAHFA after the elimination of neutral oleic acid (m/z 261.24; C16H30O2Li+) with the latter ion corresponding to the lithium adduct of dehydrated HFA. The α-isomer MS2 spectrum (Figure 4B) showed abundant m/z 279.25 (C16H32O3Li+), the same ion already observed in MS2. Since the ion was negligibly small in ω- and absent in 10-isomers, it could be considered a diagnostic ion for α-estolide-branching regioisomers that carries information about HFA component of the FAHFA unit. This peak was accompanied by low abundant product ion at m/z 233.25 (C15H30OLi+), differing from it by the mass of CO2.
Compared to ammonium adducts, the CID and HCD mass spectra of the lithium adducts allowed a deeper insight into the structure of TG-EST. Abundant lithiated FAHFA species made it possible to determine FA and HFA in the FAHFA moiety for all estolide-branching regioisomers. As in the case of ammonium adducts, clear differentiation of the α-isomers from the others was possible. In summary, the MS2 HCD and MS3 CID/CID spectra of lithiated FAHFA made it possible to characterize the FAHFA subunit, i.e., to identify FA, HFA, and the α-estolide-branching site.
OzID has previously been proven to be a useful ion activation method for the structural analysis of lipids and in particular for the resolution of lipid regioisomers [47,48,49,50,51,62]. This technique harnesses ozonolysis reactions of mass-selected ions within the mass spectrometer to identify the location of carbon–carbon double bonds that are either present in the native lipid structure or are formed during preceding ion activation events. As ozonolysis is selective for carbon–carbon double bonds, only highly-specific fragmentations are induced that can provide for unambiguous structure elucidation [45,46]. We employed ozonolysis in a sequential CID/CID/OzID workflow to differentiate estolide-branching site of isomers. The MS4 spectra of lithiated TG-EST 13 are shown in Figure S94. Elimination of FA from FAHFA moiety yields dehydration products [49,63]. In the case of lithiated TG-EST 3 (10-isomer), the CID product ion m/z 261.24 is a mixture of lithiated 9- and 10-Hexadecenoic acids. Their ozonolysis in the final OzID step provided aldehyde ions m/z 179.12 (C9H16O3Li+) and m/z 193.14 (C10H18O3Li+) which unambiguously identified n-7 and n-6 carbon–carbon double bond positions and thus also the estolide-branching site (Figure S94C). The product ion m/z 263.22 (C15H28O3Li+) diagnostic for ω-estolide-branching site was observed in the spectrum of TG-EST 1 (Figure S94A). OzID did not provide any diagnostic fragment for the α-estolide-branching site in TG-EST 2 (Figure S94B).

3.1.3. Fragmentation of Sodium Adducts

Sodium adducts are readily formed from neutral lipids [64], including TG-EST [25,36,41], and provide informative fragmentation spectra.
The MS2 HCD spectra of sodiated TG-EST 13 (m/z 1105.94; C69H126O8Na+) closely resembled spectra of lithium adducts (Figure 5). All estolide-branching regioisomers easily eliminated glycerol-linked palmitoleic acid (m/z 851.71; C53H96O6Na+) and readily formed sodiated FAHFA (m/z 559.47; C34H64O4Na+). Elimination of palmitoleic acid sodium salt (m/z 829.73; C53H97O6+) and combined loss of both glycerol-linked palmitoleic acids (m/z 599.50; C37H68O4Na+) yielded minor signals. While the neutral loss of FAHFA moiety as neutral acid (m/z 569.45; C35H62O4Na+) or sodium salt (m/z 547.47; C35H63O4+) proceeded inefficiently in ω- (TG-EST 1), it was a favored process in α- (TG-EST 2) and 10- (TG-EST 3) isomers. Neutral loss of oleic acid from the FAHFA subunit occurred only from the 10-isomer (TG-EST 3), yielding abundant fragment m/z 823.68 (C51H92O6Na+). In the low mass range region, acylium ions of glycerol-linked palmitoleic acid (m/z 237.22; C16H29O+) and HFA-linked oleic acid (m/z 265.25; C18H33O+) were detected, alongside with sodium adducts of these FAs (m/z 277.21; C16H30O2Na+ and m/z 305.25; C18H34O2Na+, respectively). The fragment m/z 295.22 (C16H32O3Na+) in the spectrum of the α-isomer (TG-EST 2) corresponded to neutral loss of ketene of oleic acid from m/z 559.47 (FAHFA subunit sodium adduct). The HCD spectra of TG-EST 48 sodium adducts are presented in Supplementary Materials (Figure S95).
The HCD spectra of sodium adducts provided approximately the same structural information as lithium adducts. The ion trap CID of TG-EST sodium adducts showed fragments identical to HCD, with some ions missing due to the low mass cut-off in the ion trap (Figure S96). Further fragmentation of sodiated ions by collisional activation turned out to be more challenging than for lithium with great competition for dissociation to the bare cation upon CID and thus leading to a lower abundance of lipid-related product ions.

3.2. Mass Spectra of Glycerol sn-Regioisomers

Since the neutral loss of FAs from the sn-1 and sn-3 positions of TGs are equally favored and more competitive than losses from sn-2, the relative abundance of the resulting diacylglycerol-like product ions can be used to infer the regiochemical assignment [59,65].
Here, we compared MS2 CID and HCD spectra of TG-EST 7 and TG-EST 8 differing by the relative position of FAHFA moiety on the glycerol backbone. As follows from the energy-resolved dissociation curves for [M + NH4]+, [M + Li]+, and [M + Na]+ (Figures S79, S83 and S87, respectively), CID provided a relatively stable ratio of fragment peak intensities across a wide range of NCE values (typically NCE 30–35). This was not the case for HCD, where a small change in NCE caused significant changes in product ion abundance. Therefore, CID was used to investigate the relative intensity ratios of peaks corresponding to the neutral loss of palmitic acid and FAHFA units from their positions on glycerol (Figure 6). All the spectra showed a greater peak intensity corresponding to the elimination of palmitic acid (m/z 859.77, C55H103O6+ for [M + NH4]+; m/z 865.78, C55H102O6Li+ for [M + Li]+; and m/z 881.76, C55H102O6Na+ for [M + Na]+), consistent with the presence of two palmitic acid radyls in each isomer. In contrast, the relative abundance of the product ions corresponding to the neutral loss of FAHFA (m/z 551.50, C35H67O4+, for [M + NH4]+) or lithiated/sodiated FAHFA (m/z 571.53, C36H68O4Li+ for [M + Li]+; and m/z 587.50, C36H68O4Na+ for [M + Na]+), while variable across the adducts, was consistently higher where the FAHFA was esterified at sn-1/3 (compared to FAHFA linked to sn-2). The effect was most pronounced in the case of ammonium adducts (Figure 6A,D). Therefore, the relative abundance of these diagnostic product ions consistently reflected the FAHFA position on the glycerol backbone.
Relying on product ion abundances can lead to ambiguous regiochemical assignments particularly where standard reference materials are not available or in the case of complex samples that may comprise isomeric mixtures. Therefore, we searched for product ions specific to the backbone regiochemistry of TG-EST subunit on glycerol.
Previous investigations have shown that CID of lithium and sodium adduct ions of TGs [50] lead to a five-membered 1,3-dioxolane ring and neutral the loss of one FA. The adjacent FA remains tethered to the glycerol by a newly formed carbon–carbon double bond that can react with ozone and reveal the adjacency of the two FA on the backbone. Analogous MS3 CID/OzID workflow was used for TG-EST 7 and TG-EST 8. Activation of lithium and sodium adducts in CID resulted in a neutral loss of the palmitic acid originally linked to the glycerol backbone, yielding product ions at m/z 865.78 (C55H102O6Li+) and m/z 881.76 (C55H102O6Na+), respectively. When exposed to ozone, the lithiated product ion provided MS3 (CID/OzID) spectra shown in Figure 7. For both sn-isomers, an ozonide at m/z 913.77 (C55H102O9Li+) and its oxygen elimination product (m/z 881.77; C55H102O7Li+) were formed. Oxidative cleavage across the nascent carbon–carbon double bond led to Criegee, aldehyde and carbonate ester product ions indicative of the neutral loss of the FA and/or FAHFA moiety adjacent to the palmitic acid and thus a fragmentation pattern suitable for distinguishing the sn-regioisomers (Figure 7). The TG-EST 7, with the FAHFA moiety in the sn-1/3 position, provided a pair of Criegee and carbonate ester fragments at m/z 687.54 (C40H72O8Li+) and m/z 671.54 (C40H72O7Li+), respectively. On the contrary, lithiated TG-EST 8 with the FAHFA moiety in the sn-2 decomposed to two pairs of diagnostic ions, (i) Criegee fragment m/z 557.51 (C35H66O4Li+) and aldehyde ion m/z 541.51 (C35H66O3Li+), and (ii) Criegee fragment m/z 379.27 (C20H36O6Li+) accompanied by carbonate ester m/z 363.27 (C20H36O5Li+).
An analogous fragmentation was observed for sodiated TG-EST isomers (Figure 8).
CID/OzID mass spectra of both sodiated and lithiated adduct ions showed the presence of low abundant product ions that were inconsistent with either the putative lipid regiochemistry or the exclusivity of the dissociation mechanisms indicated in Figure 7 and Figure 8, for example, the presence of a small amount of m/z 671.54 in Figure 7B and m/z 687.52 in Figure 8B. These ions point to either a small amount of the alternate regioisomer, perhaps arising from transacylation during synthesis, or the participation of an alternative, but poorly competitive, dissociation pathway. Future work to combine multi-stage ion activation with chromatographic resolution of isomers would be a suitable means to address this ambiguity.

4. Discussion

High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry of ammonium, lithium, and sodium adducts provided important pieces of information on the structure of TG-EST. By selecting the ion type and activation method, it was possible to distinguish TG-EST isomeric species and characterize their structural features. Lithium was determined to be the most useful cationization agent. Lithiated species provided more informative CID and HCD spectra than sodium and ammonium adducts. In the MS2, ions permitting the identification of FA, HFA, and FAHFA subunits were present, and some of the lithiated fragments allowed us to characterize branching of the FAHFA moiety. In the MS3, all isomers showed loss of FA from lithiated FAHFA ions; abundant ions corresponding to a loss of ketene of FA were additionally present in the α-isomers. The MS4 with OzID as the last fragmentation step allowed an even more detailed characterization of the estolide-branching site in FAHFA. In this experiment, ozonolysis was used to determine the position of carbon–carbon double bonds formed after elimination of FA from lithiated FAHFA. A similar level of structural information was obtained with sodiated TG-EST. Sodiated species were, however, difficult to fragment in subsequent MS steps because sodium tended to dissociate as bare cation during collisions. Despite their easy formation, ammonium adducts proved less useful as they did not provide FAHFA fragments that could be activated further. All the adducts allowed us to distinguish between sn-1/3 and sn-2 TG-EST isomers. The relative abundance of CID fragments corresponding to neutral loss of FAHFA and FA (ammonium adducts) or lithiated/sodiated FAHFA and neutral loss of FA was significantly higher for sn-1/3 isomers. The effect was pronounced the most in the case of ammonium adducts. The glycerol sn-regioisomers were also distinguished by CID/OzID of lithium or sodium adducts. Specific peaks in the spectra made it possible to identify the regioisomers unambiguously.
The fragmentation pathways described in this work are the basis for developing new methods for analyzing TG-EST in biological samples using HPLC/MS. A high-resolution mass spectrometer was used to understand the fragmentation pathways. High-resolution instruments are also recommended for analyzing biological samples; however, reliable identification of TG-EST can also be achieved using devices with lower resolving power. CID in QqQ or QTOF-type instruments can be expected to provide similar spectra to HCD discussed in this work. We worked with a concentration of standards of 10 µmol L−1. Spectra of similar quality can, however, be obtained at significantly lower concentrations (Figure S97) that are biologically relevant (concentration of TG-EST in the HPLC/MS samples are typically in µmol L−1 range). To comprehensively analyze TG-ESTs in biological matrices, it will be necessary to combine mass spectrometry with efficient chromatography. The HPLC separation of isomeric lipids is a great challenge, especially when it comes to very complex lipid matrices, such as vernix caseosa.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom13030475/s1; Schemes S1–S8: Preparation of TG-EST 18; Figures S1–S75: 1H and 13C NMR spectra of prepared TG-EST 18 and their intermediates; Figures S76–S79: Energy-resolved dissociation curves for [M + NH4]+ of TG-EST 18 obtained by CID and HCD; Figures S80–S83: Energy-resolved dissociation curves for [M + Li]+ of TG-EST 18 obtained by CID and HCD; Figures S84–S87: Energy-resolved dissociation curves for [M + Na]+ of TG-EST 18 obtained by CID and HCD; Figure S88: MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + NH4]+ (NCE 16%) of TG-EST 48; Figure S89: MS2 CID spectra of TG-EST [M + NH4]+ (NCE 30%) of TG-EST 16; Figure S90: MS3 CID/CID spectra of TG-EST [M + NH4]+ of TG-EST 13; Figure S91: Reaction mechanism for fragmentation of lithiated TG-EST 1 resulting in m/z 583.53; Figure S92: MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+ (NCE 33%) of TG-EST 48; Figure S93: MS2 CID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+ (NCE 40%) of TG-EST 16; Figure S94: MS4 CID/CID/OzID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+ of TG-EST 13; Figure S95: MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+ (NCE 35%) of TG-EST 48; Figure S96: MS2 CID spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+ (NCE 40%) of TG-EST 16; Figure S97: Mass spectra of TG-EST 2 at lower concentrations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.C. and V.V.; methodology, L.C., V.V. and S.J.B.; investigation, L.C.; resources (organic synthesis), A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.; writing—review and editing, L.C., J.C., M.P., S.J.B. and Z.B.; visualization, L.C.; supervision, J.C.; funding acquisition, L.C. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Grant Agency of Charles University, project SVV and project GAUK 348721. The research was also funded by the European Regional Development Fund, OP RDE (project CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000729), the European Social Fund; OP RDE; Project: “IOCB Mobility II” (No. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/18_053/0016940) and by the project National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases (Programme EXCELES, ID Project No. LX22NPO5104)—Funded by the European Union—Next Generation EU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brejchova, K.; Balas, L.; Paluchova, V.; Brezinova, M.; Durand, T.; Kuda, O. Understanding FAHFAs: From structure to metabolic regulation. Prog. Lipid Res. 2020, 79, 101053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Riecan, M.; Paluchova, V.; Lopes, M.; Brejchova, K.; Kuda, O. Branched and linear fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (FAHFA) relevant to human health. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 231, 107972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vavrušová, A.; Vrkoslav, V.; Plavka, R.; Bosáková, Z.; Cvačka, J. Analysis of (O-acyl) alpha-and omega-hydroxy fatty acids in vernix caseosa by high-performance liquid chromatography-Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 2291–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, Y.; Biresaw, G.; Cermak, S.C.; Isbell, T.A.; Ngo, H.L.; Chen, L.; Durham, A.L. Fatty Acid Estolides: A Review. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2020, 97, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McLean, S.; Davies, N.W.; Nichols, D.S.; McLeod, B.J. Triacylglycerol estolides, a new class of mammalian lipids, in the paracloacal gland of the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Lipids 2015, 50, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tan, D.; Ertunc, M.E.; Konduri, S.; Zhang, J.; Pinto, A.M.; Chu, Q.; Kahn, B.B.; Siegel, D.; Saghatelian, A. Discovery of FAHFA-Containing Triacylglycerols and Their Metabolic Regulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 8798–8806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brejchova, K.; Radner, F.P.W.; Balas, L.; Paluchova, V.; Cajka, T.; Chodounska, H.; Kudova, E.; Schratter, M.; Schreiber, R.; Durand, T.; et al. Distinct roles of adipose triglyceride lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase in the catabolism of triacylglycerol estolides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2020999118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paluchova, V.; Oseeva, M.; Brezinova, M.; Cajka, T.; Bardova, K.; Adamcova, K.; Zacek, P.; Brejchova, K.; Balas, L.; Chodounska, H.; et al. Lipokine 5-PAHSA Is Regulated by Adipose Triglyceride Lipase and Primes Adipocytes for De Novo Lipogenesis in Mice. Diabetes 2020, 69, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brezinova, M.; Cajka, T.; Oseeva, M.; Stepan, M.; Dadova, K.; Rossmeislova, L.; Matous, M.; Siklova, M.; Rossmeisl, M.; Kuda, O. Exercise training induces insulin-sensitizing PAHSAs in adipose tissue of elderly women. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2020, 1865, 158576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saponara, E.; Penno, C.; Orsini, V.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Fischer, A.; Aebi, A.; Matadamas-Guzman, M.L.; Brun, V.; Fischer, B.; Brousseau, M.; et al. Loss of Hepatic Leucine-Rich Repeat-Containing G-protein Coupled Receptors 4 and 5 Promotes Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Am. J. Pathol. 2023, 193, 161–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brejchova, K.; Paluchova, V.; Brezinova, M.; Cajka, T.; Balas, L.; Durand, T.; Krizova, M.; Stranak, Z.; Kuda, O. Triacylglycerols containing branched palmitic acid ester of hydroxystearic acid (PAHSA) are present in the breast milk and hydrolyzed by carboxyl ester lipase. Food Chem. 2022, 388, 132983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sprecher, H.W.; Maier, R.; Barber, M.; Holman, R.T. Structure of an optically active allene-containing tetraester triglyceride isolated from the seed oil of Sapium sebiferum. Biochemistry 1965, 4, 1856–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mikolajczak, K.L.; Smith, C.R., Jr.; Wolff, I.A. Glyceride structure of Cardamine impatiens L. Seed oil. Lipids 1968, 3, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Christie, W.W. The glyceride structure of sapium sebiferum seed oil. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1969, 187, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Phillips, B.E.; Smith, C.R., Jr. Glycerides of Monnina emarginata seed oil. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Lipids Lipid Metab. 1970, 218, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kleiman, R.; Spencer, G.F.; Earle, F.R.; Nieschlag, H.J.; Barclay, A.S. Tetra-acid triglycerides containing a new hydroxy eicosadienoyl moiety in Lesquerella auriculata seed oil. Lipids 1972, 7, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Payne-Wahl, K.; Plattner, R.D.; Spencer, G.F.; Kleiman, R. Separation of tetra-, penta-, and hexaacyl triglycerides by high performance liquid chromatography. Lipids 1979, 14, 601–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Plattner, R.D.; Payne-Wahl, K.; Tjarks, L.W.; Kleiman, R. Hydroxy acids and estolide triglycerides of Heliophila amplexicaulis L.f. Seed oil. Lipids 1979, 14, 576–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Madrigal, R.V.; Smith, C.R., Jr. Estolide triglycerides of Trewia nudiflora seed oil. Lipids 1982, 17, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Payne-Wahl, K. Quantitation of estolide triglycerides in sapium seeds by high performance liquid chromatography with infrared detection. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1983, 60, 1011–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aitzetmüller, K.; Xin, Y.; Werner, G.; Grönheim, M. High-performance liquid chromatographic investigations of stillingia oil. J. Chromatogr. A 1992, 603, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hayes, D.G.; Kleiman, R.; Phillips, B.S. The triglyceride composition, structure, and presence of estolides in the oils of Lesquerella and related species. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1995, 72, 559–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hayes, D.G.; Kleiman, R.; Weisleder, D.; Adlof, R.O.; Cuperus, F.P.; Derksen, J.T.P. Occurrence of estolides in processed Dimorphotheca pluvialis seed oil. Ind. Crops Prod. 1995, 4, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spitzer, V.; Tomberg, W.; Pohlentz, G. Structure analysis of an allene-containing estolide tetraester triglyceride in the seed oil of Sebastiana commersoniana (Euphorbiaceae). Lipids 1997, 32, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lin, J.-T.; Arcinas, A.; Harden, L.R.; Fagerquist, C.K. Identification of (12-Ricinoleoylricinoleoyl)diricinoleoylglycerol, an Acylglycerol Containing Four Acyl Chains, in Castor (Ricinus communis L.) Oil by LC-ESI-MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 3498–3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lin, J.-T.; Arcinas, A. Regiospecific Identification of 2-(12-Ricinoleoylricinoleoyl)-1,3-diricinoleoyl-sn-glycerol in Castor (Ricinus communis L.) Oil by ESI-MS4. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3616–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, J.-T.; Chen, G.Q. Identification of Minor Acylglycerols Less Polar than Triricinolein in Castor Oil by Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 1773–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, J.-T.; Chen, G.Q. Ratios of Regioisomers of Minor Acylglycerols Less Polar than Triricinolein in Castor Oil Estimated by Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 1785–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.; Olson, D.J.H.; Van, D.; Purves, R.W.; Smith, M.A. Rapid identification of triacylglycerol-estolides in plant and fungal oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 37, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, J.-T.; Chen, G.Q. Identification of Tetraacylglycerols in Lesquerella Oil by Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry of the Lithium Adducts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2013, 90, 1831–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, M.A.; Zhang, H.; Forseille, L.; Purves, R.W. Characterization of novel triacylglycerol estolides from the seed oil of Mallotus philippensis and Trewia nudiflora. Lipids 2013, 48, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, J.-T.; Chen, G. Quantification of the molecular species of tetraacylglycerols in lesquerella (Physaria fendleri) Oil by HPLC and MS. Enliven Bio Anal. Tech. 2014, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, H.; Smith, M.A.; Purves, R.W. Optimization of triacylglycerol-estolide analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2014, 91, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Smith, M.A.; Zhang, H. Apocynaceae seed lipids: Characterization and occurrence of isoricinoleic acid and triacylglycerol estolides. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2016, 93, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Lin, J.-T.; Chen, G.Q. Structural characteristics of the molecular species of tetraacylglycerols in lesquerella (Physaria fendleri) oil elucidated by mass spectrometry. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Romsdahl, T.; Shirani, A.; Minto, R.E.; Zhang, C.; Cahoon, E.B.; Chapman, K.D.; Berman, D. Nature-Guided Synthesis of Advanced Bio-Lubricants. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Matsuzawa, Y.; Higashi, Y.; Takano, K.; Takahashi, M.; Yamada, Y.; Okazaki, Y.; Nakabayashi, R.; Saito, K.; Tsugawa, H. Food Lipidomics for 155 Agricultural Plant Products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 8981–8990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Tu, X.; Lin, L.; Du, L.; Feng, X. Analysis of Lipids in Pitaya Seed Oil by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Foods 2022, 11, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morris, L.J.; Hall, S.W. The structure of the glycerides of ergot oils. Lipids 1966, 1, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Batrakov, S.G.; Tolkachev, O.N. The structures of triacylglycerols from sclerotia of the rye ergot Claviceps purpurea (Fries) Tul. Chem. Phys. Lipids 1997, 86, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lucejko, J.J.; La Nasa, J.; Porta, F.; Vanzetti, A.; Tanda, G.; Mangiaracina, C.F.; Corretti, A.; Colombini, M.P.; Ribechini, E. Long-lasting ergot lipids as new biomarkers for assessing the presence of cereals and cereal products in archaeological vessels. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Patel, R.; Santoro, A.; Hofer, P.; Tan, D.; Oberer, M.; Nelson, A.T.; Konduri, S.; Siegel, D.; Zechner, R.; Saghatelian, A.; et al. ATGL is a biosynthetic enzyme for fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids. Nature 2022, 606, 968–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Nelson, A.T.; Kolar, M.J.; Chu, Q.; Syed, I.; Kahn, B.B.; Saghatelian, A.; Siegel, D. Stereochemistry of Endogenous Palmitic Acid Ester of 9-Hydroxystearic Acid and Relevance of Absolute Configuration to Regulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4943–4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Yasuda, S.; Okahashi, N.; Tsugawa, H.; Ogata, Y.; Ikeda, K.; Suda, W.; Arita, M. Elucidation of Gut Microbiota-Associated Lipids Using LC-MS/MS and 16S rRNA Sequence Analyses. iScience 2020, 23, 101841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Thomas, M.C.; Mitchell, T.W.; Harman, D.G.; Deeley, J.M.; Nealon, J.R.; Blanksby, S.J. Ozone-Induced Dissociation:  Elucidation of Double Bond Position within Mass-Selected Lipid Ions. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Brown, S.H.J.; Mitchell, T.W.; Blanksby, S.J. Analysis of unsaturated lipids by ozone-induced dissociation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2011, 1811, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Poad, B.L.J.; Marshall, D.L.; Harazim, E.; Gupta, R.; Narreddula, V.R.; Young, R.S.E.; Duchoslav, E.; Campbell, J.L.; Broadbent, J.A.; Cvačka, J.; et al. Combining Charge-Switch Derivatization with Ozone-Induced Dissociation for Fatty Acid Analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 2135–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pham, H.T.; Maccarone, A.T.; Thomas, M.C.; Campbell, J.L.; Mitchell, T.W.; Blanksby, S.J. Structural characterization of glycerophospholipids by combinations of ozone-and collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry: The next step towards “top-down” lipidomics. Analyst 2014, 139, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Marshall, D.L.; Saville, J.T.; Maccarone, A.T.; Ailuri, R.; Kelso, M.J.; Mitchell, T.W.; Blanksby, S.J. Determination of ester position in isomeric (O-acyl)-hydroxy fatty acids by ion trap mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2016, 30, 2351–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Marshall, D.L.; Pham, H.T.; Bhujel, M.; Chin, J.S.R.; Yew, J.Y.; Mori, K.; Mitchell, T.W.; Blanksby, S.J. Sequential Collision- and Ozone-Induced Dissociation Enables Assignment of Relative Acyl Chain Position in Triacylglycerols. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 2685–2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kozlowski, R.L.; Mitchell, T.W.; Blanksby, S.J. Separation and Identification of Phosphatidylcholine Regioisomers by Combining Liquid Chromatography with a Fusion of Collision-and Ozone-Induced Dissociation. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2015, 21, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Liebisch, G.; Fahy, E.; Aoki, J. Update on LIPID MAPS classification, nomenclature, and shorthand notation for MS-derived lipid structures. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 1539–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Machara, A.; Křivánek, J.; Dolejšová, K.; Havlíčková, J.; Bednárová, L.; Hanus, R.; Kyjaková, P. Identification and Enantiodivergent Synthesis of (5Z,9S)-Tetradec-5-en-9-olide, a Queen-Specific Volatile of the Termite Silvestritermes minutus. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 2266–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tupec, M.; Culka, M.; Machara, A.; Macháček, S.; Bím, D.; Svatoš, A.; Rulíšek, L.; Pichová, I. Understanding desaturation/hydroxylation activity of castor stearoyl Δ9-Desaturase through rational mutagenesis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2022, 20, 1378–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Poad, B.L.; Young, R.S.; Marshall, D.L.; Trevitt, A.J.; Blanksby, S.J. Accelerating Ozonolysis Reactions Using Supplemental RF-Activation of Ions in a Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 3897–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. McAnoy, A.M.; Wu, C.C.; Murphy, R.C. Direct qualitative analysis of triacylglycerols by electrospray mass spectrometry using a linear ion trap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 1498–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Dorschel, C.A. Characterization of the TAG of peanut oil by electrospray LC-MS-MS. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2002, 79, 749–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Murphy, R.C. Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Lipids: Molecular Analysis of Complex Lipids; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hsu, F.F.; Turk, J. Structural characterization of triacylglycerols as lithiated adducts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using low-energy collisionally activated dissociation on a triple stage quadrupole instrument. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 10, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tran, A.; Wan, L.; Xu, Z.; Haro, J.M.; Li, B.; Jones, J.W. Lithium Hydroxide Hydrolysis Combined with MALDI TOF Mass Spectrometry for Rapid Sphingolipid Detection. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hsu, F.-F.; Bohrer, A.; Turk, J. Formation of lithiated adducts of glycerophosphocholine lipids facilitates their identification by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Young, R.S.E.; Flakelar, C.L.; Narreddula, V.R.; Jekimovs, L.J.; Menzel, J.P.; Poad, B.L.J.; Blanksby, S.J. Identification of Carbon-Carbon Double Bond Stereochemistry in Unsaturated Fatty Acids by Charge-Remote Fragmentation of Fixed-Charge Derivatives. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 16180–16188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Buenger, E.W.; Reid, G.E. Shedding light on isomeric FAHFA lipid structures using 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 26, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Herrera, L.C.; Potvin, M.A.; Melanson, J.E. Quantitative analysis of positional isomers of triacylglycerols via electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of sodiated adducts. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 24, 2745–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Laakso, P. Mass spectrometry of triacylglycerols. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2002, 104, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Studied structures of TG-EST 18. Lipid nomenclature according to Liebisch et al. [52].
Figure 1. Studied structures of TG-EST 18. Lipid nomenclature according to Liebisch et al. [52].
Biomolecules 13 00475 g001
Figure 2. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + NH4]+ (NCE 16%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Figure 2. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + NH4]+ (NCE 16%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g002
Figure 3. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+ (NCE 33%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Figure 3. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+ (NCE 33%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g003
Figure 4. MS3 CID/CID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+. The product ion at m/z 543.50 arising from [M + Li]+ was further fragmented: (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Figure 4. MS3 CID/CID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+. The product ion at m/z 543.50 arising from [M + Li]+ was further fragmented: (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—10-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g004
Figure 5. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+ (NCE 35%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—ω-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Figure 5. MS2 HCD spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+ (NCE 35%): (A) TG-EST 1—ω-isomer; (B) TG-EST 2—α-isomer; (C) TG-EST 3—ω-isomer. Diagnostic fragment ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g005
Figure 6. MS2 CID spectra of TG-EST glycerol sn-regioisomers. Variable molecular adducts of TG-EST 7 (sn-1/3) were fragmented: (A) [M + NH4]+; (B) [M + Li]+; and (C) [M + Na]+. Variable adducts of TG-EST 8 (sn-2) were fragmented: (D) [M + NH4]+; (E) [M + Li]+; and (F) [M + Na]+. Values of relative abundance ratios of fragments were described.
Figure 6. MS2 CID spectra of TG-EST glycerol sn-regioisomers. Variable molecular adducts of TG-EST 7 (sn-1/3) were fragmented: (A) [M + NH4]+; (B) [M + Li]+; and (C) [M + Na]+. Variable adducts of TG-EST 8 (sn-2) were fragmented: (D) [M + NH4]+; (E) [M + Li]+; and (F) [M + Na]+. Values of relative abundance ratios of fragments were described.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g006
Figure 7. MS3 CID/OzID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+. The CID product ion at m/z 865.78 corresponding to neutral loss of palmitic acid was re-isolated and allowed to react with ozone: (A) TG-EST 7sn-1/3-isomer; (B) TG-EST 8sn-2-isomer. Diagnostic product ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red. Selected product ion abundances were magnified, as indicated.
Figure 7. MS3 CID/OzID spectra of TG-EST [M + Li]+. The CID product ion at m/z 865.78 corresponding to neutral loss of palmitic acid was re-isolated and allowed to react with ozone: (A) TG-EST 7sn-1/3-isomer; (B) TG-EST 8sn-2-isomer. Diagnostic product ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red. Selected product ion abundances were magnified, as indicated.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g007
Figure 8. MS3 CID/OzID spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+. The CID product ion at m/z 881.76 corresponding to neutral loss of palmitic acid was re-isolated and allowed to react with ozone: (A) TG-EST 7sn-1/3-isomer; (B) TG-EST 8sn-2-isomer. Diagnostic product ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red. Selected product ion abundances were magnified, as indicated.
Figure 8. MS3 CID/OzID spectra of TG-EST [M + Na]+. The CID product ion at m/z 881.76 corresponding to neutral loss of palmitic acid was re-isolated and allowed to react with ozone: (A) TG-EST 7sn-1/3-isomer; (B) TG-EST 8sn-2-isomer. Diagnostic product ions for the various positional isomers are highlighted in red. Selected product ion abundances were magnified, as indicated.
Biomolecules 13 00475 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cudlman, L.; Machara, A.; Vrkoslav, V.; Polášek, M.; Bosáková, Z.; Blanksby, S.J.; Cvačka, J. Characterization of Triacylglycerol Estolide Isomers Using High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Nanoelectrospray Ionization. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030475

AMA Style

Cudlman L, Machara A, Vrkoslav V, Polášek M, Bosáková Z, Blanksby SJ, Cvačka J. Characterization of Triacylglycerol Estolide Isomers Using High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Nanoelectrospray Ionization. Biomolecules. 2023; 13(3):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cudlman, Lukáš, Aleš Machara, Vladimír Vrkoslav, Miroslav Polášek, Zuzana Bosáková, Stephen J. Blanksby, and Josef Cvačka. 2023. "Characterization of Triacylglycerol Estolide Isomers Using High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Nanoelectrospray Ionization" Biomolecules 13, no. 3: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop