Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 28, 2020

Gestationalism and the Rights of Adolescent Mothers

  • Teresa Baron ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the ways in which consideration of adolescent parents forces us to confront and question common presuppositions about parental rights. In particular, I argue that recognising the right of adolescent mothers not to be forcibly separated from their newborn children justifies rejecting the notion that parental rights are (a) all acquired in the same manner and (b) acquired as a ‘bundle’ of concomitant moral rights. I conclude that children and adolescents who conceive and give birth have some parental rights concerning their newborn children – in particular, the right not to be forcibly separated from those children – even if they do not have the ‘full complement’ of parental rights as we generally characterise these.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the reviewers and guest editors of Moral Philosophy and Politics for their feedback and suggestions. Research for this article was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 679586.

References

Archard, D. (1990). ‘Child Abuse: Parental Rights and the Interests of the Child’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2): 183–194.10.4324/9781315090085-25Search in Google Scholar

Archard, D. (2010). ‘The Obligations and Responsibilities of Parenthood’, in D. Benatar and D. Archard (eds.). Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press): pp. 103–127.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590704.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Brake, E. (2010). ‘Willing Parents: A Voluntarist Account of Parental Role Obligations’, in D. Archard and D. Benatar (eds.). Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children (Oxford: Oxford University Press): pp. 151–177.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590704.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Brighouse, H. and Swift, A. (2006). ‘Parents’ Rights and the Value of the Family’, Ethics 117 (1): 80–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/508034.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, H. (1980). Equal Rights for Children (Paterson, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, and Co.).Search in Google Scholar

Ferdinand Schoeman. (1980). ‘Rights of Children, Rights of Parents, and the Moral Basis of the Family’, Ethics 91 (1): 6–19.10.1086/292199Search in Google Scholar

Firestone, S. (1970). The Dialectic of Sex (New York: William Morrow and Co).Search in Google Scholar

Gheaus, A. (2012). ‘The Right to Parent One’s Biological Baby’, Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (4): 432–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00402.x.Search in Google Scholar

Gheaus, A. (2015). ‘Is There a Right to Parent?’, Law, Ethics and Philosophy 3: 193–204.Search in Google Scholar

Gheaus, A. (2018). ‘Biological Parenthood: Gestational, Not Genetic’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (2): 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1354389.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, J. (1975). Escape from Childhood: The Needs and Rights of Children (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Search in Google Scholar

Millum, J. (2010). ‘How Do We Acquire Parental Rights?’, Social Theory and Practice 36 (1): 112.10.5840/soctheorpract20103615Search in Google Scholar

Montague, P. (2000). ‘The Myth of Parental Rights’, Social Theory and Practice 26 (1): 47–68.10.5840/soctheorpract20002612Search in Google Scholar

NHS Trust v JP. (2019). EWCOP 23 (High Court, 18 June 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Oren, L. (2006). ‘Thwarted Fathers or Pop-Up Pops? How to Determine When Putative Fathers Can Block the Adoption of Their Newborn Children’, Family Law Quarterly 40 (2): 153–190.Search in Google Scholar

Page, E. (1984). ‘Parental Rights’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (2): 187–203.10.4324/9781003024958-10Search in Google Scholar

Preda, A. (2015). ‘Are There Any Conflicts of Rights?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4): 677–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9596-2.Search in Google Scholar

Prusak, B.G. (2011). ‘The Costs of Procreation’, Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2010.01519.x.Search in Google Scholar

Revel, A., Revel-Vilk, S., Aizenman, E., Porat-Katz, A., Safran, A., Ben-meir, A., Weintraub, M., Shapira, M., Achache, H., and Laufer, N. (2009). ‘At What Age Can Human Oocytes Be Obtained?’, Fertility and Sterility 92 (2): 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.013.Search in Google Scholar

Rothman, B.K. (1996). ‘Daddy Plants a Seed: Personhood under Patriarchy’, Hastings L.J. 47: 1241–1248.Search in Google Scholar

Schapiro, T. (1999). ‘What Is a Child?’, Ethics 109 (4): 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/233943.Search in Google Scholar

Shanley, M.L. (1995). ‘Unwed Fathers’ Rights, Adoption, and Sex Equality: Gender-Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Patriarchy’, Columbia Law Review 95 (1): 60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123127.Search in Google Scholar

Vallentyne, P. (2003). ‘Rights and Duties of Childrearing’, William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 11 (3): 991–1010.Search in Google Scholar

Weinberg, R. (2008). ‘The Moral Complexity of Sperm Donation’, Bioethics 22 (3): 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00624.x.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-05-28
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mopp-2019-0045/html
Scroll to top button