Closed ideals of operators on the Tsirelson and Schreier spaces
Section snippets
Introduction and statement of main results
Let X be a Banach space with an unconditional basis . For a subset N of , we write for the basis projection corresponding to N; that is, for each , where denotes the jth coordinate functional. By a spatial ideal of the Banach algebra of bounded operators on X, we understand the closed, two-sided ideal generated by the basis projection for some non-empty subset N of . A spatial ideal is non-trivial if where denotes the ideal of
Preliminaries, including the framework of the proof of Theorem 1.1
For a set N, denotes its power set, while and are the sets of infinite and finite subsets of N, respectively. We write for the cardinality of N; the letter denotes the cardinality of the continuum.
For two non-empty subsets M and N of , we use the notation to indicate that M is finite and . By an interval in a subset N of , we understand a set of form , where J is an interval of in the usual sense. (Note that the interval J may be open, closed or
Tsirelson's space
Following Figiel and Johnson [11], we use the term Tsirelson's space for the dual of the reflexive Banach space that Tsirelson [40] originally constructed with the property that it does not contain any of the classical sequence spaces and for , and we denote it by T. This convention makes no difference from the point of view of ideal lattices because T is reflexive, so the adjoint map , is an isometric, linear bijection which is anti-multiplicative in the sense that
The Schreier spaces of finite order
The aim of this section is to establish Lemma 2.8 and Theorem 1.2(ii) for the Schreier space of order associated with the Schreier family , originally defined by Alspach and Argyros [1]. Their precise definition is as follows.
Definition 4.1 Let and for , recursively define For , the Schreier space of order n is the completion of with respect to the norm We denote this
Some open questions
Theorem 1.2(ii) and its proof raise some natural questions. To state them concisely, let for some , and denote the closure of the ideal of operators on X which factor through by ; in the notation of the proof of Theorem 1.2(ii), , and the argument given in its last paragraph shows that However, we do not know whether this inclusion is proper. We also do not know whether .
Another, somewhat less
Acknowledgements
The research presented in this paper was initiated when the third- and second-named authors visited Washington & Lee University, VA, in October 2015 and 2016, respectively, supported by Washington & Lee Summer Lenfest grants. It was continued when the first-named author visited the UK in February/March 2017, supported by a Scheme 2 grant (reference number 21608) from the London Mathematical Society. Kania's work has also received funding from GAČR project 19-07129Y; RVO 67985840 (Czech
References (42)
- et al.
Representations of
J. Funct. Anal.
(1969) - et al.
Homomorphisms and derivations from
J. Funct. Anal.
(1994) - et al.
The lattice of closed ideals in the Banach algebra of operators on certain Banach spaces
J. Funct. Anal.
(2004) - et al.
Sequence-singular operators
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(2016) - et al.
Complexity of weakly null sequences
Diss. Math.
(1992) - et al.
Strictly singular operators in Tsirelson like spaces
Ill. J. Math.
(2013) - et al.
A hereditarily indecomposable -space that solves the scalar-plus-compact problem
Acta Math.
(2011) Two-sided ideals and congruences in the ring of bounded operators in Hilbert space
Ann. Math.
(1941)- et al.
On Tsirelson's space
Isr. J. Math.
(1984) - et al.
Tsirelson's Space
(1989)