Abstract
We compare two types of universal operators constructed relatively recently by Cabello Sánchez, and the authors. The first operator \({\Omega }\) acts on the Gurariĭ space, while the second one \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) has values in a fixed separable Banach space \({{\mathbb {S}}}\). We show that if \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) is the Gurariĭ space, then both operators are isometric. We also prove that, for a fixed space \({{\mathbb {S}}}\), the operator \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) is isometrically unique. Finally, we show that \({\Omega }\) is generic in the sense of a natural infinite game.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Universal operators
The purpose of this note is to discuss two constructions of universal operators between separable Banach spaces. We are interested in isometric universality. Namely, an operator U is universal if its restrictions to closed subspaces are, up to linear isometries, all linear operators of norm not exceeding \(\Vert U\Vert \). To be more precise, a bounded linear operator \(U:V \rightarrow W\) acting between separable Banach spaces is universal if for every linear operator \(T:X \rightarrow Y\) with X, Y separable and \(\Vert T\Vert \le \Vert U\Vert \), there exist linear isometric embeddings \(i:X \rightarrow V\), \(j:Y \rightarrow W\) such that the diagram
is commutative, that is, \(U \circ \, i = j \circ T\). Such an operator has been relatively recently constructed by the authors [5]. Another recent work [2], due to Cabello Sánchez and the present authors, contains in particular a construction of a linear operator that is universal in a different sense. Namely, let us say that a bounded linear operator \(U:V \rightarrow W\) is left-universal (for operators into W) if for every linear operator \(T:X \rightarrow W\) with X separable and \(\Vert T\Vert \le \Vert U\Vert \) there exists a linear isometric embedding \(i:X \rightarrow V\) for which the diagram
is commutative, that is, \(U \circ i = T\). Note that if W is separable, then U is right-invertible (i.e. a projection), as one can take the identity of W in place of T. Clearly, if W is isometrically universal in the class of all separable Banach spaces then a left-universal operator with values into W is universal. The left-universal operator U constructed in [2] had been later essentially used (with a suitable space W) for finding an isometrically universal graded Fréchet space [1]. There exist other concepts of universality in operator theory, see the introduction of [5] for more details and references.
Let us note the following simple facts related to universal operators.
Proposition 1.1
Let \(U:V \rightarrow W\) be a bounded linear operator acting between separable Banach spaces.
-
(1)
If U is universal then both V and W are isometrically universal among the class of separable Banach spaces.
-
(2)
Assume U is left-universal. Then \(\ker U\) is isometrically universal among the class of separable Banach spaces. Furthermore, U is right-invertible, that is, there exists an isometric embedding \(e:W \rightarrow V\) such that \(U \circ e = {\text {id}_{W}}\).
-
(3)
Assume U is (left-)universal. Then \({\lambda }U\) is (left-)universal for every \({\lambda }>0\).
Proof
(1) Fix a separable Banach space X. Taking the zero operator \(T:X \rightarrow 0\), we see that V contains an isometric copy of X. Taking the identity \({\text {id}_{X}}\), we see that W contains an isometric copy of X.
(2) The same argument as above, using the zero operators, shows that \(\ker U\) is isometrically universal. Taking the identity \({\text {id}_{W}}\), we obtain the required isometric embedding \(e:W \rightarrow V\).
(3) Assume U is universal, fix \({\lambda }>0\) and fix \(T:X \rightarrow Y\) with \(\Vert T\Vert \le {\lambda }\Vert U\Vert \). Then \(\Vert {\lambda }^{-1}T\Vert \le \Vert U\Vert \), therefore there are isometric embeddings \(i:X \rightarrow V\), \(j:Y \rightarrow W\) such that \(U \circ i = j \circ ({\lambda }^{-1} T)\). Finally, \(({\lambda }U) \circ i = j \circ T\). If U is left-universal, the argument is the same, the only difference is that \(j = {\text {id}_{W}}\). \(\square \)
By (3) above, we may restrict attention to non-expansive operators. It turns out that there is an easy way of constructing left-universal operators, once we have in hand an isometrically universal space. The argument below was pointed out to us by Przemysław Wojtaszczyk.
Example 1.2
Let V be an isometrically universal Banach space and let W be an arbitrary Banach space. Consider \(V \oplus W\) with the maximum norm and let
be the canonical projection. Given a non-expansive operator \(T:X \rightarrow W\) with X separable, choose an isometric embedding \(e:X \rightarrow V\) and define \(j:X \rightarrow V \oplus W\) by \(j(x) = (e(x), T(x))\). Then j is an isometric embedding and \(\pi \circ j = T\), showing that \(\pi \) is left-universal. Of course, if additionally W is isometrically universal, then \(\pi \) is a universal operator.
Perhaps the most well known universal Banach space is \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\), the space of all continuous (real or complex) valued functions on the unit interval, endowed with the maximum norm. In view of the example above, there exists a universal operator from \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1]) \oplus {{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\) onto \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\). This leads to (at least potentially) many other universal operators, namely:
Proposition 1.3
Let V, W be isometrically universal separable Banach spaces. Then there exists a universal operator from V into W.
Proof
Fix a universal operator \(\pi :E \rightarrow F\) (for instance, \(E = {{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1]) \oplus {{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\) and \(F = {{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\)) and fix a linear isometric embedding \(e:E \rightarrow V\). Using the amalgamation property for linear operators (see, e.g. [4, Lemma 1.2] where it is proved for almost isometries, however exactly the same construction works for arbitrary operators), we find a separable Banach space \(V'\), a linear isometric embedding \(e':F \rightarrow V'\), and a non-expansive linear operator \(\Omega :V \rightarrow V'\) for which the diagram
is commutative. As W is isometrically universal, we may additionally assume that \(V' = W\), replacing \(\Omega \) by \(i \circ \Omega \) and \(e'\) by \(i \circ e'\), where i is a fixed isometric embedding of \(V'\) into W. It is evident that now \(\Omega \) is a universal operator, because of the universality of \(\pi \). \(\square \)
As a consequence, there exists a universal operator on \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\). We do not know whether there exists a left-universal operator on \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\). The situation changes when replacing [0, 1] with the Cantor set \(2^{{\mathbb {N}}}\). The space \({{\mathcal {C}}}(2^{{\mathbb {N}}})\) is linearly isomorphic (but not isometric) to \({{\mathcal {C}}}([0,1])\) and it is isometrically universal, too. Furthermore, \({{\mathcal {C}}}(2^{{\mathbb {N}}}) \oplus {{\mathcal {C}}}(2^{{\mathbb {N}}})\) with the maximum norm is linearly isometric to \({{\mathcal {C}}}(2^{{\mathbb {N}}})\), because the disjoint sum of two copies of the Cantor set is homeomorphic to the Cantor set. Thus, Example 1.2 provides a left-universal operator on \({{\mathcal {C}}}(2^{{\mathbb {N}}})\).
Another, not so well known, universal Banach space is the Gurariĭ space. This is the unique, up to a linear isometry, separable Banach space \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) satisfying the following condition:
-
For every \(\varepsilon >0\), for every finite-dimensional spaces \(X_0 \subseteq X\), for every linear isometric embedding \(f_0:X_0 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) there exists a linear \(\varepsilon \)-isometric embedding \(f:X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) such that \(f \restriction X_0 = f_0\).
By an \(\varepsilon \)-isometric embedding (briefly: \(\varepsilon \)-embedding) we mean a linear operator f satisfying
for every x in the domain of f. The space \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) was constructed by Gurariĭ [6]; its uniqueness was proved by Lusky [9].
The universal operator constructed in [5] has a special property that actually makes it unique, up to linear isometries. Below we quote the precise result.
Theorem 1.4
([5]) There exists a non-expansive linear operator \({\Omega }:{{\mathbb {G}}} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) with the following property:
-
(G)
Given \(\varepsilon >0\), given a non-expansive operator \(T:X \rightarrow Y\) between finite-dimensional spaces, given \(X_0 \subseteq X\), \(Y_0 \subseteq Y\) and isometric embeddings \(i:X_0 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j:Y_0 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) such that \({\Omega }\circ i = j \circ (T\restriction X_0)\), there exist \(\varepsilon \)-embeddings \(i':X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j':Y \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) satisfying
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert i'\restriction X_0 - i\Vert \le \varepsilon , \quad \Vert j'\restriction Y_0 - j\Vert \le \varepsilon , \qquad \text {and}\qquad \Vert {\Omega }\circ i' - j' \circ T\Vert \le \varepsilon . \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, \({\Omega }\) is a universal operator and property (G) specifies it uniquely, up to a linear isometry.
According to [5], we shall call condition (G) the Gurariĭ property. What makes this operator of particular interest is perhaps its almost homogeneity:
Theorem 1.5
([5]) Given finite-dimensional subspaces \(X_0,X_1,Y_0,Y_1\) of \({{\mathbb {G}}}\), given linear isometries \(i:X_0 \rightarrow X_1\), \(j:Y_0 \rightarrow Y_1\) such that \({\Omega }\circ i = j \circ {\Omega }\), for every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exist bijective linear isometries \(I:{{\mathbb {G}}} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(J:{{\mathbb {G}}} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) satisfying \({\Omega }\circ I = J \circ {\Omega }\) and \(\Vert I \restriction X_0 - i\Vert < \varepsilon \), \(\Vert J \restriction Y_0 - j\Vert < \varepsilon \).
We now describe the left-universal operators constructed in [2]. Fix a separable Banach space \({{\mathbb {S}}}\).
Theorem 1.6
([2, Section 6]) There exists a non-expansive linear operator \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}:V_{{\mathbb {S}}} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) with \(V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) a separable Banach space, satisfying the following condition:
- \((\ddagger )\):
-
For every finite-dimensional spaces \(X_0 \subseteq X\), for every non-expansive linear operator \(T:X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\), for every linear isometric embedding \(e:X_0 \rightarrow V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) such that \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\circ e \!=\! T \restriction X_0\), for every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding \(f:X \rightarrow V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) satisfying
$$\begin{aligned} \Vert f \restriction X_0 - e\Vert \le \varepsilon \qquad \text {and} \qquad \Vert {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\circ f - T\Vert \le \varepsilon . \end{aligned}$$
Furthermore, \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) is left-universal for operators into \({{\mathbb {S}}}\).
We shall say that an operator P has the left-Gurariĭ property if it satisfies (\(\ddagger \)) in place of \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\). Of course, unlike the Gurariĭ property, the left-Gurariĭ property involves a parameter \({{\mathbb {S}}}\), namely, the common range of the operators. The left-universality of \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) implies that it is right-invertible, i.e., there is an isometric embedding \(J:{{\mathbb {S}}} \rightarrow V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) such that \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\circ J = {\text {id}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}}\). The operator \(J \circ {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) is a non-expansive projection of \(V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) onto an isometric copy of \({{\mathbb {S}}}\).
Actually, the operator \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) was constructed in [2] in case where \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) had some additional property, needed only for determining the domain of \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\). Moreover, [2] deals with p-Banach spaces, where \(p \in (0, 1]\), however \(p=1\) gives exactly the result stated above. Operators \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) have the following property which can be called almost left-homogeneity.
Theorem 1.7
Given finite-dimensional subspaces \(X_0, X_1\) of \(V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\), a linear isometry \(h:X_0 \rightarrow X_1\) such that \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}} \circ h = {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}} \restriction X_0\), for every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists a bijective linear isometry \(H:V_{{\mathbb {S}}} \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) satisfying \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}} \circ H = {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) and \(\Vert H \restriction X_0 - h\Vert < \varepsilon \).
Two operators U, V are isometric if there are bijective linear isometries i, j such that \(U \circ j = i \circ V\). In this note we present a proof that condition \((\ddagger )\) determines \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) uniquely, up to linear isometries. The arguments will also provide a proof of Theorem 1.7. Furthermore, we show that \({\Omega }= {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {G}}}}\) and that \({\Omega }\) is a generic operator in the space of all non-expansive operators on the Gurariĭ space into itself, in the sense of a natural variant of the Banach-Mazur game.
2 Properties of \({\Omega }\) and \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\)
Let us recall the following easy fact concerning finite-dimensional normed spaces (cf. [4, Thm. 2.7] or [1, Claim 2.3]). It actually says that the strong operator topology is equivalent to the norm topology in the space of linear operators with a fixed finite-dimensional domain.
Lemma 2.1
Let A be a vector basis of a finite-dimensional normed space E. For every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists \(\delta >0\) such that for every Banach space X, for every linear operator \(f:E \rightarrow X\) the following implication holds:
Proof
Fix \(M>0\) satisfying the following condition:
- (*):
-
\(\max _{a\in A}|{\lambda }_a| \le M\) whenever \(x = \sum _{a \in A}{\lambda }_a a\) and \(\Vert x\Vert \le 1\).
Such M clearly exists, because of compactness of the unit ball of E. Now, given \(\varepsilon >0\), let \(\delta = \varepsilon /(M\cdot |A|)\). Suppose \(\max _{a\in A}\Vert f(a)\Vert \le \delta \). Then, given \(x = \sum _{a \in A}{\lambda }_a a\) with \(\Vert x\Vert \le 1\), we have
We conclude that \(\Vert f\Vert \le \varepsilon \). \(\square \)
The following result, in the case \({{\mathbb {S}}}= {{\mathbb {G}}}\), can be found in [1].
Theorem 2.2
Let \(P:V \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) be a linear operator. The following conditions are equivalent.
-
(a)
P has the left-Gurariĭ property (\(\ddagger \)).
-
(b)
For every finite-dimensional spaces \(X_0 \subseteq X\), for every non-expansive linear operator \(T:X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\), for every linear isometric embedding \(e:X_0 \rightarrow V\) such that \(P \circ e = T \restriction X_0\), for every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding \(f:X \rightarrow V\) satisfying
$$\begin{aligned} {f \restriction X_0 = e} \qquad \text {and} \qquad {P \circ f = T}. \end{aligned}$$
Proof
Obviously, (b) is stronger than (\(\ddagger \)).
Fix \(\varepsilon >0\) and fix a vector basis A of X such that \(A_0 = X_0 \cap A\) is a basis of \(X_0\). We may assume that \(\Vert a\Vert =1\) for every \(a \in A\). Fix \(\delta >0\) and apply the left-Gurariĭ property for \(\delta \) instead of \(\varepsilon \). We obtain a \(\delta \)-embedding \(f:X \rightarrow V\) such that \(\Vert f\restriction X_0 - e\Vert \le \delta \) and \(\Vert P \circ f - T\Vert \le \delta \). Define \(f':X \rightarrow V\) by the conditions \(f'(a) = e(a)\) for \(a \in A_0\) and \(f'(a) = f(a)\) for \(a \in A \setminus A_0\). Note that \(\Vert f'(a)-f(a)\Vert \le \delta \) for every \(a \in A\). Thus, if \(\delta \) is small enough, then by Lemma 2.1, we can obtain that \(f'\) is an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding. Furthermore, \(\Vert P \circ f' - P \circ f\Vert \le \varepsilon \) (recall that \(\delta \) depends on \(\varepsilon \) and the norm of X only), therefore \(\Vert P \circ f' - T\Vert \le \varepsilon + \delta \).
The arguments above show that for every \(\varepsilon >0\) there exists an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding \(f':X \rightarrow V\) extending e and satisfying \(\Vert P \circ f' - T\Vert \le \varepsilon \).
Let us apply this property for \(\delta \) instead of \(\varepsilon \), where \(\delta \) is taken from Lemma 2.1. We obtain a \(\delta \)-embedding \(f:X \rightarrow V\) extending e and satisfying \(\Vert P \circ f - T\Vert \le \delta \).
Now recall that P is left-universal (Theorem 1.6), therefore there is an isometric embedding \(J:{{\mathbb {S}}} \rightarrow V\) such that \(P \circ J\) is the identity (take the identity of \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) in the definition of left-universality). Given \(a \in A \setminus A_0\), the vector
has norm \(\le \delta \). Define \(f':X \rightarrow V\) by the conditions \(f'\restriction X_0 = e\) and
for \(a \in A \setminus A_0\). Lemma 2.1 implies that \(f'\) is an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding, because \(\Vert f'(a) - f(a)\Vert = \Vert w_a\Vert \le \delta \) for \(a \in A \setminus A_0\). Finally, given \(a \in A \setminus A_0\), we have
and the same obviously holds for \(a \in A_0\). Thus \(P \circ f' = T\). \(\square \)
The proof of the next result is just a suitable adaptation of the arguments above, therefore we skip it.
Proposition 2.3
Let \(\Omega :V \rightarrow W\) be a linear operator. The following conditions are equivalent.
-
(a)
\(\Omega \) has the Gurariĭ property (G).
-
(b)
Given \(\varepsilon >0\), given a non-expansive operator \(T:X \rightarrow Y\) between finite-dimensional spaces, given \(X_0 \subseteq X\), \(Y_0 \subseteq Y\) and isometric embeddings \(i_0:X_0 \rightarrow V\), \(j_0:Y_0 \rightarrow W\) such that \(\Omega \circ i_0 = j_0 \circ (T\restriction X_0)\), there exist \(\varepsilon \)-embeddings \(i:X \rightarrow V\), \(j:Y \rightarrow W\) satisfying
$$\begin{aligned} i\restriction X_0 = i_0, \quad j\restriction Y_0 = j_0, \qquad \text {and}\qquad \Omega \circ i = j \circ T. \end{aligned}$$
The last result of this section is the key step towards identifying \({\Omega }\) with \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {G}}}}\).
Theorem 2.4
The operator \({\Omega }\) has the left-Gurariĭ property (i.e., it satisfies condition \((\ddagger )\) of Theorem 1.6 with \({{\mathbb {S}}}= {{\mathbb {G}}}\)). In particular, it is left-universal.
Proof
Fix a non-expansive linear operator \(T:X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) with X finite-dimensional, and fix an isometric embedding \(e:X_0 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), where \(X_0\) is a linear subspace of X and \(T\restriction X_0 = {\Omega }\circ e\). Let \(Y_0 = Y = T[X] \subseteq {{\mathbb {G}}}\) and consider T as an operator from X to Y. Applying the Gurariĭ property with \(i = e\) and j the inclusion \(Y_0 \subseteq {{\mathbb {G}}}\), we obtain an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding \(e':X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) which is \(\varepsilon \)-close to e and satisfies \(\Vert {\Omega }\circ e' - T\Vert \le \varepsilon \). This is precisely condition (\(\ddagger \)) from Theorem 1.6. \(\square \)
In order to conclude that \({\Omega }= {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {G}}}}\), it remains to show that (\(\ddagger \)) determines the operator uniquely. This is done in the next section.
3 Uniqueness of \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\)
Before proving that the left-Gurariĭ property determines the operator uniquely, we quote the following crucial lemma from [3].
Lemma 3.1
Let \(\varepsilon >0\) and let \(f:X \rightarrow Y\) be an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding, where X, Y are Banach spaces. Let \(\pi :X \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\), \(\varrho :Y \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) be non-expansive linear operators such that \(\Vert \varrho \circ f - \pi \Vert \le \varepsilon \). Then there exists a norm on \(Z = X \oplus Y\) such that the canonical embeddings \(i:X \rightarrow Z\), \(j:Y \rightarrow Z\) are isometric, \(\Vert j \circ f - i\Vert \le \varepsilon \) and the operator \(t:Z \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) defined by \(t(x,y) = \pi (x) + \varrho (y)\) is non-expansive.
Note that the operator t satisfies \(t \circ i = \pi \) and \(t \circ j = \varrho \). Actually, the norm mentioned in the lemma above does not depend on the operators \(\pi \), \(\varrho \). It is defined by the following formula:
where \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _X\), \(\Vert \cdot \Vert _Y\) denote the norm of X and Y, respectively. An easy exercise shows that (\(*\)) is the required norm, proving Lemma 3.1.
Theorem 3.2
Let \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) be a separable Banach space and let \(\pi :E \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\), \(\pi ':E' \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) be non-expansive linear operators, both with the left-Gurariĭ property. If E, \(E'\) are separable Banach spaces, then there exists a linear isometry \(i:E \rightarrow E'\) such that \(\pi = \pi ' \circ i\). In particular, \(\pi \) and \(\pi '\) are linearly isometric to \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\).
Proof
It suffices to prove the following
Claim 3.3
Let \(E_0 \subseteq E\) be a finite-dimensional space, \(0<\varepsilon <1\), let \(i_0:E_0 \rightarrow E'\) be an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding such that \(\pi ' \circ i_0 = \pi \restriction E_0\). Then for every \(v \in E\), \(v' \in E'\), for every \(\eta >0\) there exists an \(\eta \)-embedding \(i_1:E_1 \rightarrow E'\) such that \(E_1\) is finite-dimensional, \(E_0 \subseteq E_1 \subseteq E\) and the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
\(v \in E_1\) and \({\text {dist}}(v',i_1[E_1]) < \eta \);
-
(2)
\(\Vert i_0 - i_1 \restriction E_0\Vert < \varepsilon + \eta \) and \(\pi ' \circ i_1 = \pi \).
Using Claim 3.3 together with the separability of E and \(E'\), we can construct a sequence \(i_n:E_n \rightarrow E'\) of linear operators such that \(i_n\) is a \(2^{-n}\)-embedding, \(\bigcup _{n\in \omega }E_n\) is dense in E, \(\bigcup _{n\in \omega }i_n[E_n]\) is dense in \(E'\) and
for every \({n\in \omega }\). It is evident that \({\{{i}_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}}\) converges pointwise to a linear isometry whose completion i is the required bijection from E onto \(E'\) satisfying \(\pi ' \circ i = \pi \). Thus, it remains to prove Claim 3.3.
This will be carried out by making two applications of Lemma 3.1.
Fix \(0<\delta <1\); more precise estimations for \(\delta \) will be given later. Let \(E_0' \subseteq E'\) be a finite-dimensional space containing \(v'\) and such that \(i_0[E_0] \subseteq E_0'\). Applying Lemma 3.1, we obtain linear isometric embeddings \(e_1:E_0 \rightarrow W_0\), \(f_1:E_0' \rightarrow W_0\) and a non-expansive operator \(t_0:W_0 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) such that \(t_0 \circ e_1 = \pi \restriction E_0\), \(t_0 \circ f_1 = \pi ' \restriction E_0'\), and \(\Vert e_1 - f_1 \circ i_0\Vert \le \varepsilon \). Knowing that \(\pi \) has the left-Gurariĭ property, by Theorem 2.2 applied to the isometric embedding \(e_1\), we obtain a \(\delta \)-embedding \(g_1:W_0 \rightarrow E\) such that \(g_1 \circ e_1\) is the identity on \(E_0\) and \(\pi \circ g_1 = t_0\).
Now note that \(g_1 \circ f_1\) is a \(\delta \)-embedding of \(E_0'\) into a finite-dimensional subspace \(E_1\) of E. Without loss of generality, we may assume that \(v \in E_1\). Applying Lemma 3.1 again to \(g_1 \circ f_1\), we obtain linear isometric embeddings \(e_2:E_1 \rightarrow W_1\), \(f_2:E_0' \rightarrow W_1\) and a non-expansive linear operator \(t_1:W_1 \rightarrow {{\mathbb {S}}}\) such that \(t_1 \circ e_2 = \pi \restriction E_1\), \(t_1 \circ f_2 = \pi ' \restriction E_0'\), and \(\Vert e_2 \circ g_1 \circ f_1 - f_2\Vert \le \delta \). Knowing that \(\pi '\) has the left-Gurariĭ property and using Theorem 2.2 for the isometric embedding \(f_2\), we obtain a \(\delta \)-embedding \(g_2:W_1 \rightarrow E'\) such that \(g_2 \circ f_2\) is the identity on \(E_0'\) and \(\pi ' \circ g_2 = t_1\). The configuration is described in the following diagram, where the horizontal arrows are inclusions, the triangle \(E_0 E_0' W_0\) is \(\varepsilon \)-commutative, and the triangle \(E_0' E_1 W_1\) is \(\delta \)-commutative.
It remains to check that \(i_1 := g_2 \circ e_2\) is the required \(\delta \)-embedding.
First, recall that \(v \in E_1\), \(v' \in E_0'\) and \(v' = g_2(f_2(v'))\). Thus, using the fact that \(\Vert g_2\Vert \le 1+\delta \), we get
Now if \((1+\delta )\delta \Vert v'\Vert <\eta \), then we conclude that \({\text {dist}}(v',i_1[E_1]) < \eta \), therefore condition (1) is satisfied.
Given \(x \in E_1\), note that
Here we have used the fact that \(\pi ' \circ g_2 = t_1\) and \(t_1 \circ e_2 = \pi \restriction E_1\).
Furthermore, given \(x \in E_0\), we have
because \(\Vert g_2\Vert \le 1+\delta \). On the other hand,
Here we have used the following facts: \(e_2\) is an isometric embedding, \(g_1\) is a \(\delta \)-embedding, \(i_0\) is an \(\varepsilon \)-embedding, \(\Vert e_2 g_1 f_1 - f_2\Vert \le \delta \), \(\Vert e_1 - f_1 i_0\Vert \le \varepsilon \) and \(\varepsilon <1\).
Finally, \(\Vert i_1(x) - i_0(x)\Vert \le (1+\delta ) (\varepsilon + 3\delta ) \Vert x\Vert \le (\varepsilon + 7\delta ) \Vert x\Vert \). Summarizing, if \((1+\delta )\delta \Vert v'\Vert <\eta \) and \(7\delta < \eta \) then conditions (1), (2) are satisfied. This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Note that if \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) is the trivial space, the proof above reduces to the well known uniqueness of the Gurariĭ space, shown by this way in [8]. Furthermore, the arguments above can be applied to \(\pi = \pi ' = {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) and \(i_0 = h\), thus proving Theorem 1.7. Theorems 2.4 and 3.2 yield the following result, announced before.
Corollary 3.4
\({\Omega }= {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {G}}}}\).
In particular, \(V_{{\mathbb {G}}}= {{\mathbb {G}}}\). It has been shown in [2] that \(V_{{\mathbb {S}}}= {{\mathbb {G}}}\) as long as \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) is a (separable) Lindenstrauss space, namely, an isometric \(L_1\) predual or (equivalently) a locally almost 1-injective space. Instead of going into details, let us just say that Lindenstrauss spaces are those (separable) Banach spaces that are linearly isometric to a 1-complemented subspace of the Gurariĭ space. The non-trivial direction was proved by Wojtaszczyk [10]. Thus, since \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) is a projection, if \(V_{{\mathbb {S}}}\) is linearly isometric to \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) then \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) is necessarily a Lindenstrauss space.
4 Generic operators
Inspired by the result of [7], let us consider the following infinite game for two players Eve and Adam. Namely, Eve starts by choosing a non-expansive linear operator \(T_0:E_0 \rightarrow F_0\), where \(E_0\), \(F_0\) are finite-dimensional normed spaces. Adam responds by a non-expansive linear operator \(T_1:E_1 \rightarrow F_1\), such that \(E_1 \supseteq E_0\), \(F_1 \supseteq F_0\) are again finite-dimensional and \(T_1\) extends \(T_0\). Eve responds by a further non-expansive linear extension \(T_2:E_2 \rightarrow F_2\), and so on. So at each stage of the game we have a linear operator between finite-dimensional normed spaces. After infinitely many steps we obtain a chain of non-expansive operators \(\{T_n:E_n \rightarrow F_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}\). Let \(T_\infty :E_\infty \rightarrow F_\infty \) denote the completion of its union, namely, \(E_\infty \) is the completion of \(\{E_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}\), \(F_\infty \) is the completion of \(\{F_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}\) and \(T_\infty \restriction E_n = T_n\) for every \({n\in \omega }\). So far, we cannot say who wins the game.
Let us say that a (necessarily non-expansive) linear operator \(U:X \rightarrow Y\) is generic if Adam has a strategy making the operator \(T_\infty \) isometric to U. Recall that operators U, V are isometric if there are bijective linear isometries i, j such that \(U \circ j = i \circ V\).
Theorem 4.1
The operator \({\Omega }\) is generic.
Proof
Let us fix a non-expansive linear operator \(U:{{\mathbb {G}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) between separable Banach spaces satisfying (G). Adam’s strategy can be described as follows.
Fix a countable set \(\{v_n: a_n\rightarrow b_n\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\) linearly dense in \(U:{{\mathbb {G}}}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\). Let \(T_0:E_0 \rightarrow F_0\) be the first move of Eve. Adam finds isometric embeddings \(i_0:E_0\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j_0:F_0\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) and finite-dimensional spaces \(E_0\subset E_1\), \(F_0 \subset F_1\) together with isometric embeddings \(i_1:E_1\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) , \(j_1:F_1\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) and non-expansive linear operators \(T_1:E_1 \rightarrow F_1\) such that \(T_1\) extends \(T_0\), \(a_0\in i_1[E_1]\), \(b_0\in j_1[F_1]\).
Suppose now that \(n = 2k > 0\) and \(T_n:E_n \rightarrow F_n\) was the last move of Eve. We assume that linear isometric embeddings \(i_{n-1} : E_{n-1}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j_{n-1} : F_{n-1}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) have already been fixed. Using (G) from Theorem 1.4 we choose linear isometric embeddings \(i_{n} : E_{n}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j_{n} : F_{n}\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) such that \(i_n\restriction E_{n-1}\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to \(i_{n-1}\), \(j_n\restriction F_{n-1}\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to \(j_{n-1}\) and \(U\circ i_n\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to \(j_n\circ T_n\).
Let \(\{T_n:E_n\rightarrow F_n \}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\) be the chain of non-expansive operators between finite-dimensional normed spaces resulting from a fixed play, when Adam was using his strategy. In particular, Adam has recorded sequences \(\{T_n:E_n\rightarrow F_n\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\), \(\{i_n:E_n\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\), \(\{j_n:F_n\rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\) of linear isometric embeddings such that \(i_{2n+1}\restriction E_{2n-1}\) is \(2^{-n}\)-close to \(i_{2n-1}\) and \(j_{2n+1}\restriction F_{2n-1}\) is \(2^{-n}\)-close to \(j_{2n-1}\) for each \(n \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\).
Let \(T_\infty :E_\infty \rightarrow F_\infty \) denote the completion of those unions, namely, \(E_\infty \) is the completion of \(\{E_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}\), \(F_\infty \) is the completion of \(\{F_n\}_{{n\in \omega }}\) and \(T_\infty \restriction E_n = T_n\) for every \({n\in \omega }\). The assumptions that \(i_{2n+1}[E_{2n+1}]\) contains all the vectors \(a_0, \dots , a_n\) and \(j_{2n+1}[F_{2n+1}]\) contains all the vectors \(b_0, \dots , b_n\) ensures that both \(i_\infty [E_\infty ]\), \(j_\infty [F_\infty ]\) are dense in \({{\mathbb {G}}}\), where \(i_\infty :E_\infty \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\), \(j_\infty :F_\infty \rightarrow {{\mathbb {G}}}\) are pointwise limits of \(\{i_n\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\) and \(\{j_n\}_{n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}}\), respectively. More precisely, \(i_\infty \restriction E_k\) is the pointwise limit of \(\{i_n \restriction E_k\}_{n \ge k}\) and \(j_\infty \restriction F_k\) is the pointwise limit of \(\{j_n \restriction F_k\}_{n \ge k}\) for every \(k \in n\in {{\mathbb {N}}}\). In particular, both \(i_\infty \) and \(j_\infty \) are surjective linear isometries.
Finally, \(U \circ i_\infty = j_\infty \circ T_\infty \), because \(U \circ i_{2k}\) is \(2^{-k}\)-close to \(j_{2k} \circ T_{2k}\) for every \(k \in {{\mathbb {N}}}\). This completes the proof. \(\square \)
Question 1
Is \({\Omega }\) generic in the space of all non-expansive operators on the Gurariĭ space? In this case, being “generic” means that the set
is residual in the space of all non-expansive operators on \({{\mathbb {G}}}\). Here, it is natural to consider the pointwise convergence (i.e., strong operator) topology.
One could also consider a “parametrized” variant of the game above, where the two players build a chain of non-expansive operators from finite-dimensional normed spaces into a fixed Banach space \({{\mathbb {S}}}\). If \({{\mathbb {S}}}\) is separable then similar arguments as in the proof of Theorem 4.1 show that the second player has a strategy leading to \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\). Thus, a variant of Question 1 makes sense: Is it true that isometric copies of \({\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {S}}}}\) form a residual set in a suitable space of operators?
After concluding that \({\Omega }= {\mathbf {P}}_{{{\mathbb {G}}}}\), it seems that the “parametrized” construction of universal projections is better in the sense that it “captures” both the Gurariĭ space \({{\mathbb {G}}}\) (when the range is the trivial space \(\{0\}\)) and the universal operator \({\Omega }\) (when the range equals \({{\mathbb {G}}}\)), but also other examples, including projections from the Gurariĭ space onto any separable Lindenstrauss space (see [10] and [2]).
References
Bargetz, C., Ka̧kol, J., Kubiś, W.: A separable Fréchet space of almost universal disposition. J. Funct. Anal. 272, 1876–1891 (2017)
Cabello Sánchez, F., Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn, J., Kubiś, W.: Quasi-Banach spaces of almost universal disposition. J. Funct. Anal. 267, 744–771 (2014)
Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn, J.: Isometric uniqueness of a complementably universal Banach space for Schauder decompositions. Banach J. Math. Anal. 8, 211–220 (2014)
Garbulińska, J., Kubiś, W.: Remarks on Gurariĭ spaces. Extracta Math. 26, 235–269 (2011)
Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn, J., Kubiś, W.: A universal operator on the Gurarii space. J. Oper. Theory 73, 143–158 (2015)
Gurariĭ, V.I.: Space of universal disposition, isotropic spaces and the Mazur problem on rotations of Banach spaces. Sib. Math. J. 7, 799–807 (1966)
Kubiś, W.: Game-theoretic characterization of the Gurarii space. Archiv der Mathematik 110, 53–59 (2018)
Kubiś, W., Solecki, S.: A proof of uniqueness of the Gurariĭ space. Isr. J. Math. 195, 449–456 (2013)
Lusky, W.: The Gurarij spaces are unique. Arch. Math. (Basel) 27, 627–635 (1976)
Wojtaszczyk, P.: Some remarks on the Gurarij space. Stud. Math. 41, 207–210 (1972)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Przemysław Wojtaszczyk for pointing out Example 1.2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Joanna Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn: Research of the first author is partially suppored by NCN Grant DEC-2013/11/N/ST1/02963. Wiesław Kubiś: Research of the second author is supported by GA ČR Grant 20-22230L and RVO: 67985840.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn, J., Kubiś, W. A note on universal operators between separable Banach spaces. RACSAM 114, 148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-020-00878-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-020-00878-4