Skip to main content
Log in

Cogwheel load: a new forced vibration test for bridges?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A moving impulse load generated by a rolling heavy polygonal wheel with a constant velocity, called here the cogwheel (CW), could be used as a testing excitation for bridges. This type of dynamic load, already proposed in an earlier article, acts along the entire driving path, its intensity is adjustable, and it can be very efficient in the case of resonance. It is a combination of static and dynamic loading tests, which requires only one or a few transducers mounted on the bridge, and traffic interruption of only a few minutes. The dynamic response contains higher harmonic components, and the moving mass alters the dynamic properties continuously during the passage, which should be considered while assessing the condition of the tested structure. The high capability of indication of frequency changes is explained and demonstrated in a new scaled laboratory test. Suggestions for damage localisation are also made. It is foreseen for testing of short- and medium-sized bridges on the occasion of commissioning and periodical checks after further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

On request.

Code availability

None.

References

  1. Cunha A, Caetano E, Magalhães F et al (2013) Recent perspectives in dynamic testing and monitoring of bridges. Struct Control Health Monit 20(6):853–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farrar CR, Duffey TA, Cornwell PJ, et al. (1999) Excitation methods for bridge structures, IMAC XVII, February, Kissimmee, Florida

  3. Cantieni R (1984) Dynamic load testing of highway bridges, In: IABSE Proceedings 3/1984, ISSN-0377-7278

  4. Commander B (2019) Evolution of bridge diagnostic load testing in the USA. Front Built Environ 5:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olson LD (2005) Dynamic bridge substructure evaluation and monitoring. In: Report FHWA-RD-03-089 (Federal Highway Administration)

  6. Moughty JJ, Casas JR (2017) A state of the art review of modal-based damage detection in bridges: development, challenges, and solutions. Appl Sci 7:510. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7050510

  7. Magalhães F (2010) Operational modal analysis for testing and monitoring of bridges and special structures. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto

  8. Law S, Zhu X (2004) Dynamic behavior of damaged concrete bridge structures under moving vehicular loads. Eng Struct 26:1279–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaksic V, Connor AO’, Pakrashi V (2014) Damage detection and calibration from beam–moving oscillator interaction employing surface roughness. J Sound Vib 333:3917–3930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang YB, Lin CW, Yau JD (2004) Extracting bridge frequencies from the dynamic response of a passing vehicle. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00378-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang YB, Lin CW (2005) Vehicle–bridge interaction dynamics and potential applications. J Sound Vib 284:205–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bayer J, Urushadze S, Yau JD, Yang YB (2020) Cogwheel loading as a moving test load for bridges—analysis and laboratory experiments. MATEC Web Conf 310:00030. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031000030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salgado R, Cruz PJS, Ayala G, et al. (2014) Performance of damage detection methods used in bridge structures through dynamic tests in steel beams. Am J Civil Eng 2(2):18–26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20140202.12

  14. Sinou JJ (2009) A review of damage detection and health monitoring of mechanical systems from changes in the measurement of linear and non-linear vibrations. In: Robert CS (ed) Mechanical vibrations: measurement effects and control. Nova Science Publishers, pp.643–702. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00779322. Accessed 1 Jan 2020

  15. Fang SE, Perera R (2009) Power mode shapes for early damage detection in linear structures. J Sound Vib 324:40–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sampaio RPC, Maia NMM, Silva JMM et al (2003) Damage detection in structures from mode shape to frequency response function methods. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(3):489–498. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nozarian MM, Esfandiari A (2009) Structural damage identification using frequency response function. Mater Forum 33:443–449

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bayer J (2020) Damage detection using a cogwheel load—numerical case study. In: Proceedings of conference of Engineering Mechanics, October, Svratka, pp.74–77

  19. Luo CJ, Guo Y (2013) Vibro-Impact Dynamics. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISBN: 9781118359457

  20. Harris HG, Sabnis GM (1999) Structural modeling and experimental techniques, 2nd edition. CRC Press LLC, ISBN: 0-8493-2469-6

  21. Chen Z-W, Zhu S, Xu Y-L et al (2015) Damage detection in long suspension bridges using stress influence lines. J Br Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Obrien E, Brownjohn JMW, Hester D et al (2020) Bridge damage detection using rotation measurements—experimental validation. Mech Syst Signal Process 135:106380

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The sponsorship from Grant GACR 21-32122J of the Czech Science Foundation and of the joint research project 109WFD0410468 of the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology is greatly appreciated.

Funding

Grant of the Czech Science Foundation GACR 21-32122 J, Czech Republic & joint research Project 109WFD0410468 of the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both the authors conceived of the presented idea and contributed to the final manuscript. The corresponding author performed the experiments and the computations.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Bayer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Other tested tools for the evaluation of spectral changes

Appendix: Other tested tools for the evaluation of spectral changes

Following concepts are aimed at numerical evaluation of spectral changes.

The amplitudes (spectral lines) can either increase or decrease in the case of a damage, depending on the relative position of the traced frequency line towards the natural frequencies (before or after, respectively). The following expression can be used to estimate the amplitude changes in a chosen frequency band around a natural frequency:

$$di=\frac{{\sum }_{j=lf}^{uf}{PSD}_{j,d} -{PSD}_{j,0}}{{\sum }_{j=lf}^{uf}{PSD}_{j,0}}\left[\mathrm{\%}\right],$$
(3)

where lf and uf represent the lower or upper limit of the frequency band of interest, respectively. Zero indicates the intact (reference) condition and d the damaged condition. Equation (3) can also be used for discrete frequency lines (lf = uf). An a priori knowledge of the position of the natural frequencies is the necessary condition for application of the Eq. (3) and the evaluation of the increase or decrease is left to an engineering judgement.

The frequencies of the spectrum shift to lower frequencies in the case of a damage. Shifts of the magnitude of at least the resolution of the spectra can be detected in the measured PSD at the location of natural frequencies. A smaller change can be detected as a change of PSD momentum in a moving window w according to Eq. (4):

$$df=\sum_{{\acute{i} }=lf}^{uf}\left(\frac{{\sum }_{j=x-w/2}^{i+w/2}{F}_{j,d}\bullet {PSD}_{j,d}}{{\sum }_{j=i-w/2}^{i+w/2}{PSD}_{j,d}}-\frac{{\sum }_{j=i-w/2}^{i+w/2}{F}_{j,0}\bullet {PSD}_{j,0}}{{\sum }_{j=i-w/2}^{i+w/2}{PSD}_{j,0}}\right)[\mathrm{Hz}].$$
(4)

Fj indicates a frequency here. However, data under the noise level can cause a considerable bias of the estimation according to Eq. (4).

1.1 Experimental results

Application of Eq. (3) supplied reliable estimations beginning with the damage case + 150 g, because at the frequency of 27.7 Hz would not estimate the damage correctly (see Fig. 8) for the case + 100 g, for example.

Application of Eq. (4) worked well from the damage case + 100 g. It seems to be suitable for automatic applications.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayer, J., Urushadze, S. Cogwheel load: a new forced vibration test for bridges?. J Civil Struct Health Monit 12, 71–80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00527-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00527-3

Keywords

Navigation